• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Advice to Jury Members.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

By Rickardo Mckenzie JURYS DO?S AND DON?T?S CRITERIA CHECKLIST: DO?S DON?T?S REASONS EVALUATION 1. Base your decisions on facts only. 1. discuss case work outside the courts and be influenced by negativity. 1. Because what is said in the Jury room has to stay in the jury room. 1. This helps the decision to be fair and non-biased giving resulting in a fair trial. however If information on the case leaves the Jury room it could influence a jury?s ability to make a non-biased decision based on the second hand information the Jury wrongly acquire. 1. ...read more.

Middle

1. Because as a Jury you are expected to give verdict on your own facts gathered and from what you have witnessed. Jury make the final decision so don?t let your views become influenced by the Judges personal views. 1. Taking notes during the trail allow the juror to go back and check his facts properly rather than relying on knowledge because if the trail is based over weeks or months it could be hard to remember vital information from memory. ...read more.

Conclusion

1. Being on time is essential for a juror as they need to be there before any court proceedings may continue. A Juror may be fined for contempt of court for being late without good cause. Being late can cause many problems for the courts as a Juror can be the reason for the court to be adjourned. 1. Keep views to yourself and only rely on the facts from the case. 1. research anything about the case online or from any other source 1. Doing personal research on the case using outside information allows a juror to gain a biased view on a case. 1. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Legal personnel section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Legal personnel essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    European law

    4 star(s)

    Where there is a legislative act in question is a regulation the court has continued to apply the Plaumann test. 39 Once the applicant has demonstrated 'individual concern, he must then prove that the act was of 'direct concern'. Direct concern can be defined as measures of effects on an applicant.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    LAW REPORT on Macgregor(TM)s case

    4 star(s)

    Proprietors Act 1956, which states that a hotel proprietor is bounded to keep guest's goods safely unless they are lost by the fault of the guest himself. Section 2, subsection 3 & 4 of the Hotel proprietors Act 1956, indicates that: "Where the proprietor of hotel is liable as innkeeper

  1. Free essay

    Legal personnel

    They will be required to serve under a pupil master who is an experienced barrister, all their travel expenses will be met and they will receive a salary of no less than �833.33p a month (www.barstandardboard.rroom.net) or �10,000 a year, (Elliot & Quinn, 2009).

  2. FORENSICS ON TRIAL

    all these evidence are processed in a crime lab. Digital Forensics This is an application of proven scientific methods and techniques used to recover data from electronic/digital media. Digital forensic specialists work in the field as well as in the lab. Forensic anthropology: is an application of physical anthropology in a legal setting.

  1. Explain the work & training of barristers & solicitors

    Access To Justice Act 1999, and that by training graduates, to in fact do both is the next logical step. Many also claim, that many solicitors have the right to audience in the higher courts however, they are not taking advantage of this capability as they feel out casted and

  2. The task of the jury is to weigh up the evidence presented to them ...

    Even though it is just one percent, this can mean up to 30,000 trials and that are usually the most serious offences, such assaulting a police officer or drunk driving are dealt with in the magistrates court while the most absurd theft can be tried in the Crown court.

  1. Family Law

    Relatively mild allegations such as devoting too much time to a career, having no common interest or pursuing a separate social life may well suffice. Using mild allegations may also make it easier to agree the contents of the petition with your spouse before you issue it.

  2. judges and jury's

    The jury then retire to a private room and discuss their verdict. Their decision is normally unanimous, but if after several hours there is no likelihood of their ever reaching a unanimous verdict, the judge may accept a majority verdict agreed by at least ten of them.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work