• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Advice to Jury Members.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐By Rickardo Mckenzie JURYS DO?S AND DON?T?S CRITERIA CHECKLIST: DO?S DON?T?S REASONS EVALUATION 1. Base your decisions on facts only. 1. discuss case work outside the courts and be influenced by negativity. 1. Because what is said in the Jury room has to stay in the jury room. 1. This helps the decision to be fair and non-biased giving resulting in a fair trial. however If information on the case leaves the Jury room it could influence a jury?s ability to make a non-biased decision based on the second hand information the Jury wrongly acquire. 1. ...read more.

Middle

1. Because as a Jury you are expected to give verdict on your own facts gathered and from what you have witnessed. Jury make the final decision so don?t let your views become influenced by the Judges personal views. 1. Taking notes during the trail allow the juror to go back and check his facts properly rather than relying on knowledge because if the trail is based over weeks or months it could be hard to remember vital information from memory. ...read more.

Conclusion

1. Being on time is essential for a juror as they need to be there before any court proceedings may continue. A Juror may be fined for contempt of court for being late without good cause. Being late can cause many problems for the courts as a Juror can be the reason for the court to be adjourned. 1. Keep views to yourself and only rely on the facts from the case. 1. research anything about the case online or from any other source 1. Doing personal research on the case using outside information allows a juror to gain a biased view on a case. 1. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Legal personnel section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Legal personnel essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    European law

    4 star(s)

    effective for all member states, hence achieving the aim of the ever closer union. The fact that it restricts individual rights does seem to be harsh, such as Plaumann but could be justifiable by the fact that it could possibly open flood gates.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    LAW REPORT on Macgregor(TM)s case

    4 star(s)

    and reasonable foresee ability (The Wagon Mound No.1 (1967)5) are not likely to frustrate Beatrice's case. Given her condition and the situation, it is advised that no defence of volenti non fit injuria (Titchener v British Railways Board (1984)6)

  1. FORENSICS ON TRIAL

    It is usually done to recover and identify skeletonised human remains. Forensic archaeology Is the application of combining archaeological techniques with forensic science mainly in the law enforcement. Forensic entomology Deals with examining insects in, on and around human remains to help determine time or location of death.

  2. The task of the jury is to weigh up the evidence presented to them ...

    Even though it is just one percent, this can mean up to 30,000 trials and that are usually the most serious offences, such assaulting a police officer or drunk driving are dealt with in the magistrates court while the most absurd theft can be tried in the Crown court.

  1. Free essay

    Legal personnel

    The current selection of judges is now based on merit and good manners and candidates are assessed based on their skills and attributes rather than race or gender, (Elliot & Quinn, 2009, p.154). According to Elliot & Quinn, 2009, not all countries share the same method of appointing judges.

  2. Family Law

    Husband petitioned for divorce. Held; divorce granted as she had committed adultery and he found it intolerable to live with her. If the respondent has behaved in such a way that the petitioner cannot reasonably be expected to live with the respondent, this may be used as one of the facts.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work