• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Advise the parties of their contractual liabilities.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

On Sunday, Andrew saw in his local paper, the Daily Bungle, that Basil was offering to sell a set of 1 penny black stamps for �850. The advertisement stated that, "Will sell to the first person to come forward with the money." On Monday, Andrew telephoned Basil and after leaving his contact details left a message on Basil's answering machine saying, "Would you accept �800 for the stamps?" On Tuesday, Andrew who was afraid that Basil might sell the stamps elsewhere posted a letter to Basil in which Andrew stated, "I agree to buy the stamps which you offered for sale in the Daily Bungle for �850." This letter was delayed in the post and was not delivered till Friday. On Wednesday, Basil returned from a business trip and played back the message on the answering machine. He then posted a letter to Andrew stating, "I agree that the stamps are yours for �800." However, this letter was delayed in the post and did not arrive until the following Saturday. On Friday, when Andrew's letter arrived, Basil sent an e-mail to Andrew saying that the stamps were his for �850. ...read more.

Middle

Andrews phone call to Basil stating 'Would you accept �800 for the stamps?" would seem to be or merely a request to supply further information regarding the stamps. Alternatively, if Andrew's statement was indeed a counter offer then taking into account the judgment in Hyde v Wrench would apply. The facts of the case were that Mr. Wrench had offered to sell a plot of land �1000 to Mr. Hyde, he in turn offered to purchase it for �900, to which Mr. Wrench refused. Later on Mr. Hyde then accepted his earlier offer of �1000. Mr Wrench refused to sell and was taken to court on a breach of contract. It was held that as Mr Hyde had countered Mr Wrench's earlier offer, that offer was now invalid and not binding on Mr. Wrench to accept. Therefore in the above scenario if Andrew tries to accept Basil's earlier offer he might not be able to do so. The 'postal rule' as laid down in the judgment in Adams v Lindsell states that any acceptance sent by post will deemed to been have accepted the moment it is put into post. ...read more.

Conclusion

Only then will an acceptance be valid. The facts of the case were that The plaintiffs in London made an offer by Telex to the defendants in Holland. The defendant's acceptance was received on the plaintiffs' Telex machine in London. The plaintiffs sought leave to serve notice of a writ on the defendants claiming damages for breach of contract. Service out of the jurisdiction is allowed to enforce a contract made within the jurisdiction. It was held that the contract is only complete when the acceptance is received by the offeror: and the contract is made at the place where the acceptance is received. Furthermore, Lord Denning stated that "If a man shouts an offer to a man across a river but the reply is not heard because of a plane flying overhead, there is no contract. The offeree must wait and then shout back his acceptance so that the offeror can hear it." Accordingly, as soon as Andrew reads the email sent by Basil accepting Andrew's offer of �850 the contract is formed. In accordance with the above judgments and according to the facts, Andrew and Basil have entered into a valid contract for the sale of a set of penny black stamps for �850. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Law of Contract section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Law of Contract essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Contract Law - Offer And Acceptance

    3 star(s)

    * The withdrawal must be communicated (postal rule do not apply), and not merely by acting inconsistently. Byrne v Van Tienhoven (1880) Vienna Convention Art 16(1) 1 Oct. D posted a letter offering goods for sale. 8 Oct. D revoked the offer; which arrived on 20 Oct.

  2. Four ways in which a contract may be discharged.

    over the next day of a 'sold note' which had on the back an exclusion clause. This same procedure was followed on the occasion in question. McCutcheon v David MacBrayne [1964] 1 WLR 125. A ferry service from the Scottish mainland to the islands sank with the claimant's care on board as a result of the defendant's negligence.

  1. Contract law - Advise Sarah - The first thing to ascertain is whether the ...

    person would think that the offeror was serious about carrying out his promise, it was held that Mrs Carlill was entitled to her �100. In this case therefore, as in Carlill, the advertisement can be seen as a unilateral offer, or one that is open to 'all the world' to accept.

  2. I have been asked to advise a client on considering contracting with a building ...

    Three elements are required if promissory estoppel is to apply: 1. A waiver of rights by one of the parties 2. Where terms confer benefit to a third party 3. There must be special and unusual circumstances that must apply.

  1. LAW OF CONTRACT. LAW 103. THE CONTENT OF THE CONTRACT.

    The buyers paid the contract price of �100,000 but when the goods were discharged from the ship it was found that part had been damaged by overheating. The buyers rejected the whole shipment. The sellers refused to refund the price.

  2. Offer and Acceptance

    Sheena decides to purchase these shoes and goes to the cash desk. Tom, the cashier, informs her that they were actually � 35. Sheena believes that she should be allowed to buy the shoes at the labelled price. It is important to distinguish a true offer from what is known as an invitation to treat.

  1. Invitation To Treat

    The law of contract requires that, in order for a binding contract to exist, there must be such intention, together with offer, acceptance and consideration. The existence of intention is tested by using two established presumptions. First, if the agreement is commercial in nature, there is a presumption that they intended to be legally bound.

  2. Outline the basic rule of the law of contract regarding the effective revocation of ...

    While it is clear that the revocation must be acknowledge to the attention of the offeree, it is not entirely clear as to when the revocation is treated as being brought to his attention. In The Brimnes [1975] QB 929, it was held, if a revocation sent by telex during

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work