• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Advise the parties of their contractual liabilities.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

On Sunday, Andrew saw in his local paper, the Daily Bungle, that Basil was offering to sell a set of 1 penny black stamps for �850. The advertisement stated that, "Will sell to the first person to come forward with the money." On Monday, Andrew telephoned Basil and after leaving his contact details left a message on Basil's answering machine saying, "Would you accept �800 for the stamps?" On Tuesday, Andrew who was afraid that Basil might sell the stamps elsewhere posted a letter to Basil in which Andrew stated, "I agree to buy the stamps which you offered for sale in the Daily Bungle for �850." This letter was delayed in the post and was not delivered till Friday. On Wednesday, Basil returned from a business trip and played back the message on the answering machine. He then posted a letter to Andrew stating, "I agree that the stamps are yours for �800." However, this letter was delayed in the post and did not arrive until the following Saturday. On Friday, when Andrew's letter arrived, Basil sent an e-mail to Andrew saying that the stamps were his for �850. ...read more.

Middle

Andrews phone call to Basil stating 'Would you accept �800 for the stamps?" would seem to be or merely a request to supply further information regarding the stamps. Alternatively, if Andrew's statement was indeed a counter offer then taking into account the judgment in Hyde v Wrench would apply. The facts of the case were that Mr. Wrench had offered to sell a plot of land �1000 to Mr. Hyde, he in turn offered to purchase it for �900, to which Mr. Wrench refused. Later on Mr. Hyde then accepted his earlier offer of �1000. Mr Wrench refused to sell and was taken to court on a breach of contract. It was held that as Mr Hyde had countered Mr Wrench's earlier offer, that offer was now invalid and not binding on Mr. Wrench to accept. Therefore in the above scenario if Andrew tries to accept Basil's earlier offer he might not be able to do so. The 'postal rule' as laid down in the judgment in Adams v Lindsell states that any acceptance sent by post will deemed to been have accepted the moment it is put into post. ...read more.

Conclusion

Only then will an acceptance be valid. The facts of the case were that The plaintiffs in London made an offer by Telex to the defendants in Holland. The defendant's acceptance was received on the plaintiffs' Telex machine in London. The plaintiffs sought leave to serve notice of a writ on the defendants claiming damages for breach of contract. Service out of the jurisdiction is allowed to enforce a contract made within the jurisdiction. It was held that the contract is only complete when the acceptance is received by the offeror: and the contract is made at the place where the acceptance is received. Furthermore, Lord Denning stated that "If a man shouts an offer to a man across a river but the reply is not heard because of a plane flying overhead, there is no contract. The offeree must wait and then shout back his acceptance so that the offeror can hear it." Accordingly, as soon as Andrew reads the email sent by Basil accepting Andrew's offer of �850 the contract is formed. In accordance with the above judgments and according to the facts, Andrew and Basil have entered into a valid contract for the sale of a set of penny black stamps for �850. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Law of Contract section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Law of Contract essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Contract Law - Offer And Acceptance

    3 star(s)

    * And it is different from asking mere information. It depends on the intention, objectively ascertained Stevenson v McLean (1880) On Saturday, the defendant offered to sell iron to the plaintiff at 40 shillings a ton, open until Monday. On Monday at 10am, the plaintiff sent a telegram asking if he could have credit terms.

  2. Four ways in which a contract may be discharged.

    over the next day of a 'sold note' which had on the back an exclusion clause. This same procedure was followed on the occasion in question. McCutcheon v David MacBrayne [1964] 1 WLR 125. A ferry service from the Scottish mainland to the islands sank with the claimant's care on board as a result of the defendant's negligence.

  1. Invitation To Treat

    Conclusion In this case, the agreement from John to migrate to Australia is a social agreement which is unenforceable. There is no consideration from John's sister even selling off her house in England as she and her husband got the money back.

  2. Contract law - Advise Sarah - The first thing to ascertain is whether the ...

    In contrast, advertisements may sometimes be construed as being an offer if they are of the unilateral type, where one party promises something in return for the specified act of another. The general rule in Contract Law is that acceptance must be communicated to the offeror, but in unilateral offers, performance of the specified act constitutes acceptance 4.

  1. I have been asked to advise a client on considering contracting with a building ...

    The case is shown below; "In September 1939, the claimants let a block of flats to the defendants at an annual rent of �2,500 p.a. it was difficult to let the individual flats in wartime, so in January 1940, the claimants agreed in writing to accept a reduced rent of �1,250 p.a.

  2. Offer and Acceptance

    It is then up to the farmer to make a new offer. Sheena may decline the counter offer of � 35, but unless she decides to make a new offer, the offer at the moment would be � 35. It must be made clear whether it is a counter offer

  1. LAW OF CONTRACT. LAW 103. THE CONTENT OF THE CONTRACT.

    Question 3. Would you classify this term as a condition or a warranty? "The ship, a wooden sailing vessel, must be seaworthy." (Think of the ways in which the ship may not be seaworthy.) Answer 3. There are a number of reasons why the ship may not be seaworthy.

  2. Outline the basic rule of the law of contract regarding the effective revocation of ...

    In response, the plaintiff's agent immediately called on the defendant and made an offer of �950 for which the defendant wished to have a few days to consider. On June 27, the defendant wrote to say that he could not accept this offer.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work