• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Advise the parties of their contractual liabilities.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

On Sunday, Andrew saw in his local paper, the Daily Bungle, that Basil was offering to sell a set of 1 penny black stamps for �850. The advertisement stated that, "Will sell to the first person to come forward with the money." On Monday, Andrew telephoned Basil and after leaving his contact details left a message on Basil's answering machine saying, "Would you accept �800 for the stamps?" On Tuesday, Andrew who was afraid that Basil might sell the stamps elsewhere posted a letter to Basil in which Andrew stated, "I agree to buy the stamps which you offered for sale in the Daily Bungle for �850." This letter was delayed in the post and was not delivered till Friday. On Wednesday, Basil returned from a business trip and played back the message on the answering machine. He then posted a letter to Andrew stating, "I agree that the stamps are yours for �800." However, this letter was delayed in the post and did not arrive until the following Saturday. On Friday, when Andrew's letter arrived, Basil sent an e-mail to Andrew saying that the stamps were his for �850. ...read more.

Middle

Andrews phone call to Basil stating 'Would you accept �800 for the stamps?" would seem to be or merely a request to supply further information regarding the stamps. Alternatively, if Andrew's statement was indeed a counter offer then taking into account the judgment in Hyde v Wrench would apply. The facts of the case were that Mr. Wrench had offered to sell a plot of land �1000 to Mr. Hyde, he in turn offered to purchase it for �900, to which Mr. Wrench refused. Later on Mr. Hyde then accepted his earlier offer of �1000. Mr Wrench refused to sell and was taken to court on a breach of contract. It was held that as Mr Hyde had countered Mr Wrench's earlier offer, that offer was now invalid and not binding on Mr. Wrench to accept. Therefore in the above scenario if Andrew tries to accept Basil's earlier offer he might not be able to do so. The 'postal rule' as laid down in the judgment in Adams v Lindsell states that any acceptance sent by post will deemed to been have accepted the moment it is put into post. ...read more.

Conclusion

Only then will an acceptance be valid. The facts of the case were that The plaintiffs in London made an offer by Telex to the defendants in Holland. The defendant's acceptance was received on the plaintiffs' Telex machine in London. The plaintiffs sought leave to serve notice of a writ on the defendants claiming damages for breach of contract. Service out of the jurisdiction is allowed to enforce a contract made within the jurisdiction. It was held that the contract is only complete when the acceptance is received by the offeror: and the contract is made at the place where the acceptance is received. Furthermore, Lord Denning stated that "If a man shouts an offer to a man across a river but the reply is not heard because of a plane flying overhead, there is no contract. The offeree must wait and then shout back his acceptance so that the offeror can hear it." Accordingly, as soon as Andrew reads the email sent by Basil accepting Andrew's offer of �850 the contract is formed. In accordance with the above judgments and according to the facts, Andrew and Basil have entered into a valid contract for the sale of a set of penny black stamps for �850. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Law of Contract section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Law of Contract essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Contract Law - Offer And Acceptance

    3 star(s)

    D revoked the offer; which arrived on 20 Oct. 11 Oct. P accepted by telegram 15 Oct. P posted a letter confirming acceptance. It was held that the defendant's revocation was not effective until it was received on 20 Oct. This was too late as the contract was made on the 11th when the plaintiff sent a telegram.

  2. Four ways in which a contract may be discharged.

    over the next day of a 'sold note' which had on the back an exclusion clause. This same procedure was followed on the occasion in question. McCutcheon v David MacBrayne [1964] 1 WLR 125. A ferry service from the Scottish mainland to the islands sank with the claimant's care on board as a result of the defendant's negligence.

  1. I have been asked to advise a client on considering contracting with a building ...

    The situation arose because of the war: an unusual set of circumstances. (Taken from Common Law 1 BPP) Specific Contract Terms Terms of a contract can be specified in to categories of express terms, implied terms and innominate terms they are detailed below.

  2. Contract law - Advise Sarah - The first thing to ascertain is whether the ...

    In contrast, advertisements may sometimes be construed as being an offer if they are of the unilateral type, where one party promises something in return for the specified act of another. The general rule in Contract Law is that acceptance must be communicated to the offeror, but in unilateral offers, performance of the specified act constitutes acceptance 4.

  1. Invitation To Treat

    The essential thing to emphasise about an offer is that, once it is accepted by the offeree, a legally binding contract has been entered into, and failure to perform what has been promised will result in breach of contract. An offer may be made to a particular person or to a group of people or to the world at large.

  2. LAW OF CONTRACT. LAW 103. THE CONTENT OF THE CONTRACT.

    This was found to be a breach that did go to the root of the contract. The producers were therefore able to repudiate the contract. However the singer in Bettini had missed only a few days of rehearsals. This was not a breach that went to the root of the

  1. DIFFEERENT AREAS OF CONTRACT LAW

    They may yes be used to protect legitimate business interests such as trade secrets, designs for new products, manufacturing processes; business expansion plans investments and customers or other connections such as - * Employment contracts * Contracts involving the sale of business * Solus ( exclusive supply)

  2. Offer and Acceptance

    Therefore in Sheena's case, her acceptance of the offer was when she queued up and entered the store as the seventh customer, this is accepting the offer via conduct shown as mentioned earlier in the Carlill case and also in Brogden v Metropolitan Railway Co.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work