• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Are all Supreme Court Appointments controversial and what is the significance of Bush's two most recent nominations

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Are all Supreme Court Appointments controversial and what is the significance of Bush's two most recent nominations? The Justices which make up the Supreme Court are appointed as opposed to elected and therefore they are called into question as a democratic body. "An unelected body of judges possesses the power to declare unconstitutional those legislative acts passed by the people's elected representatives." - Bob McKeever. The fact that they are not politically accountable to the people or their representatives and yet hold extensive powers makes them controversial in a country, which prides itself on being a democratic state. However, the Supreme Court provides an alternative to elected representatives who may work in their best interests, as opposed to those they represent and only hold office for a matter of years. The Justices work independently of this system and therefore it could be suggested that they make the American political system more varied. ...read more.

Middle

The President is most likely to choose somebody who is of a similar political nature and somebody he personally feels will uphold his own beliefs. Presidents hope that their nomination will back their causes for a long time to come and make life difficult for opposing parties in the future. At the same time, the President must choose a carefully, as he must have the backing of the Senate - although only 28 of the 148 nominations before 1999 have been voted against. The appointments made to the Supreme Court are more often than not Caucasian, rich, male Christians. Therefore it can not be suggested at any time that the Supreme Court is representative of the American People. This political body is made up in order to interpretate the constitution on behalf and in the best interest of America's population 295,734,134 and yet do not share the same life experiences as the majority of these people. ...read more.

Conclusion

He claims "My faith and religious beliefs do not play a role". Miers, however, is more controversial. Firstly, Miers, although possessing much experience in the legal world, has never been a judge before and it has been suggested that she will be too inexperienced on the Supreme Court. Conservative activist Manuel Miranda has described Supreme Court nominee Harriet Miers as "possibly the most unqualified choice since Abe Fortas". However, supporters of Miers have pointed out that Chief Justice Rehnquist had no experience as a judge either. Secondly, Miers, as you may have guessed, is female and the Presidents choice has been questioned; was she chosen because it is unlikely that the Senate will vote against her, fearing they will be deemed as sexist? Or perhaps she was nominated due to the fact she is a 'close, personal' friend of Bush's and was his personal attorney in Texas? The President may live to regret his decision, however, - as she is known to be liberal in her beliefs and will perhaps become a 'Swing Justice'. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Machinery of Justice section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Machinery of Justice essays

  1. POLICE POWERS

    Act 1991, the Public Order Act 1986, Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994, the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 and the Crime and Disorder Act 1998. This power of arrest may be carried out by anyone - either a police officer or any other person - a citizen's arrest

  2. George Bush – Analysis of a political speech.

    He emphasizes the need for justice in the 7th paragraph where ye says the word justice three times. "Whether we bring our enemies to justice or bring justice our enemies, justice will be done". The topicality then shifts towards the casualties.

  1. Mandatory Minimums: A National Injustice

    Children are also often traumatized by seeing their parents getting arrested. They may witness their houses being broke into by police and their parents and property being seized by police. These disturbing scenes are occurring more and more often, demonstrating, once again, that the children are the victims.

  2. The Canadian Justice system towards aboriginal offenders

    There are no statutory requirements that the court must follow".23 The case law has only incrementally begun to formulate criteria for the implementation of sentencing circles. Chief Justice Bayda, in the case of R. v. Morin, states that the two mandatory criteria relating to sentencing circles are the willingness of

  1. Examine recent trends in the use of custody in respect of juveniles over the ...

    of good practice; and purchases and commissions places in secure and custodial institutions (www.youth-justice-board.gov.uk/who/why.html). In April 2000, under sections 65 & 66 of the 1998 Crime and Disorder Act changes were introduced to the system of reprimands and final warnings.

  2. Trident Booklet - Work Experience.

    A private placement is a company or person who is not under the Trident scheme but is willing to allow you to spend you work experience time with them. Sometimes you might have to pay for this. You should phone or write to companies or people that you would be interested in doing work experience with.

  1. "If the Constitution is the source of governmental power, and the judiciary interprets the ...

    there are also what Dworkin refers to as "abstract moral principles" (Dworkin Freedom's Law p7) such as the provision in the fourteenth amendment for "equal protection of the law" or "due process" in the fifth amendment. These clauses have to be 'converted' into practice, and this is the remit of the Supreme Court.

  2. Expert Testimony and Its Value In the Justice System

    For example there are concerns that if one expert is a better and more persuasive speaker then they may come out on top in the debate even if the evidence they are providing is not as reliable as the others.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work