• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Are all Supreme Court Appointments controversial and what is the significance of Bush's two most recent nominations

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Are all Supreme Court Appointments controversial and what is the significance of Bush's two most recent nominations? The Justices which make up the Supreme Court are appointed as opposed to elected and therefore they are called into question as a democratic body. "An unelected body of judges possesses the power to declare unconstitutional those legislative acts passed by the people's elected representatives." - Bob McKeever. The fact that they are not politically accountable to the people or their representatives and yet hold extensive powers makes them controversial in a country, which prides itself on being a democratic state. However, the Supreme Court provides an alternative to elected representatives who may work in their best interests, as opposed to those they represent and only hold office for a matter of years. The Justices work independently of this system and therefore it could be suggested that they make the American political system more varied. ...read more.

Middle

The President is most likely to choose somebody who is of a similar political nature and somebody he personally feels will uphold his own beliefs. Presidents hope that their nomination will back their causes for a long time to come and make life difficult for opposing parties in the future. At the same time, the President must choose a carefully, as he must have the backing of the Senate - although only 28 of the 148 nominations before 1999 have been voted against. The appointments made to the Supreme Court are more often than not Caucasian, rich, male Christians. Therefore it can not be suggested at any time that the Supreme Court is representative of the American People. This political body is made up in order to interpretate the constitution on behalf and in the best interest of America's population 295,734,134 and yet do not share the same life experiences as the majority of these people. ...read more.

Conclusion

He claims "My faith and religious beliefs do not play a role". Miers, however, is more controversial. Firstly, Miers, although possessing much experience in the legal world, has never been a judge before and it has been suggested that she will be too inexperienced on the Supreme Court. Conservative activist Manuel Miranda has described Supreme Court nominee Harriet Miers as "possibly the most unqualified choice since Abe Fortas". However, supporters of Miers have pointed out that Chief Justice Rehnquist had no experience as a judge either. Secondly, Miers, as you may have guessed, is female and the Presidents choice has been questioned; was she chosen because it is unlikely that the Senate will vote against her, fearing they will be deemed as sexist? Or perhaps she was nominated due to the fact she is a 'close, personal' friend of Bush's and was his personal attorney in Texas? The President may live to regret his decision, however, - as she is known to be liberal in her beliefs and will perhaps become a 'Swing Justice'. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Machinery of Justice section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Machinery of Justice essays

  1. POLICE POWERS

    Act 1991, the Public Order Act 1986, Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994, the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 and the Crime and Disorder Act 1998. This power of arrest may be carried out by anyone - either a police officer or any other person - a citizen's arrest

  2. "If the Constitution is the source of governmental power, and the judiciary interprets the ...

    Nixon and Reagan for example both had two consecutive nominations rejected by the senate. Haynsworth and Caswell, and Bork and Ginsburg respectively. This does however lead us onto the important point that the position of Supreme Court Justice is for life "during good behaviour".

  1. George Bush – Analysis of a political speech.

    He emphasizes the need for justice in the 7th paragraph where ye says the word justice three times. "Whether we bring our enemies to justice or bring justice our enemies, justice will be done". The topicality then shifts towards the casualties.

  2. The Canadian Justice system towards aboriginal offenders

    sentences should be used as a guideline for determining the sentence in the present case".37 The persistent failure of such rigid sentencing practices to diminish aboriginal criminality has provided the impetus for a sentencing philosophy which accounts for individual characteristics.

  1. Mandatory Minimums: A National Injustice

    The number of families being affected by this cruel sentencing is growing. The number of parents becoming imprisoned is rapidly increasing. In 1978 the number of parents imprisoned was 21,000. By 1990, just 12 years later, it had already increased to 1 million.

  2. Should Justice be the Supreme Virtue of Societies

    From this it would be easy to conclude that justice is equality. However, this clearly is not the case as a large majority of states in the world are liberal democracies rather than communist states. The conclusion that may be drawn from this is rather more subtle.

  1. Examine recent trends in the use of custody in respect of juveniles over the ...

    Tackling the factors that put young people at risk of offending (e.g. peer group pressure, troubled home life, drug/alcohol abuse etc), and other aspects of offending behaviour requires input from a range of agencies (www.youth-justice-board.gov.uk/who/why.html). In practice however, under-investment in alternatives to prison has meant that teenagers on remand are

  2. Expert Testimony and Its Value In the Justice System

    Concurrent Evidence In New South Wales in Australia the system of concurrent evidence is used when two or more parties wish to call upon experts to testify upon the same or a similar topic. This has is now used as the main approach to giving evidence in the New South

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work