• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Are all Supreme Court Appointments controversial and what is the significance of Bush's two most recent nominations

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Are all Supreme Court Appointments controversial and what is the significance of Bush's two most recent nominations? The Justices which make up the Supreme Court are appointed as opposed to elected and therefore they are called into question as a democratic body. "An unelected body of judges possesses the power to declare unconstitutional those legislative acts passed by the people's elected representatives." - Bob McKeever. The fact that they are not politically accountable to the people or their representatives and yet hold extensive powers makes them controversial in a country, which prides itself on being a democratic state. However, the Supreme Court provides an alternative to elected representatives who may work in their best interests, as opposed to those they represent and only hold office for a matter of years. The Justices work independently of this system and therefore it could be suggested that they make the American political system more varied. ...read more.

Middle

The President is most likely to choose somebody who is of a similar political nature and somebody he personally feels will uphold his own beliefs. Presidents hope that their nomination will back their causes for a long time to come and make life difficult for opposing parties in the future. At the same time, the President must choose a carefully, as he must have the backing of the Senate - although only 28 of the 148 nominations before 1999 have been voted against. The appointments made to the Supreme Court are more often than not Caucasian, rich, male Christians. Therefore it can not be suggested at any time that the Supreme Court is representative of the American People. This political body is made up in order to interpretate the constitution on behalf and in the best interest of America's population 295,734,134 and yet do not share the same life experiences as the majority of these people. ...read more.

Conclusion

He claims "My faith and religious beliefs do not play a role". Miers, however, is more controversial. Firstly, Miers, although possessing much experience in the legal world, has never been a judge before and it has been suggested that she will be too inexperienced on the Supreme Court. Conservative activist Manuel Miranda has described Supreme Court nominee Harriet Miers as "possibly the most unqualified choice since Abe Fortas". However, supporters of Miers have pointed out that Chief Justice Rehnquist had no experience as a judge either. Secondly, Miers, as you may have guessed, is female and the Presidents choice has been questioned; was she chosen because it is unlikely that the Senate will vote against her, fearing they will be deemed as sexist? Or perhaps she was nominated due to the fact she is a 'close, personal' friend of Bush's and was his personal attorney in Texas? The President may live to regret his decision, however, - as she is known to be liberal in her beliefs and will perhaps become a 'Swing Justice'. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Machinery of Justice section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Machinery of Justice essays

  1. POLICE POWERS

    Act 1991, the Public Order Act 1986, Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994, the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 and the Crime and Disorder Act 1998. This power of arrest may be carried out by anyone - either a police officer or any other person - a citizen's arrest

  2. "If the Constitution is the source of governmental power, and the judiciary interprets the ...

    If a decision is unanimous then it carries a far All Justices appointed to the court have a legal background and as such have been indoctrinated with certain legal principles and in particular principles of the court. It could be posited that these act to constrain the Judiciary in policy ,making.

  1. George Bush – Analysis of a political speech.

    He emphasizes the need for justice in the 7th paragraph where ye says the word justice three times. "Whether we bring our enemies to justice or bring justice our enemies, justice will be done". The topicality then shifts towards the casualties.

  2. The Canadian Justice system towards aboriginal offenders

    Numerous considerations must be taken into account by the court when considering whether a sentencing circle would be appropriate in the particular circumstance. The simple fact that a sentencing circle is requested by council does not automatically render the accused an appropriate candidate for the process.

  1. Mandatory Minimums: A National Injustice

    The children of the prisoners are caught in the middle. The loss of a parent to prison resembles the death of a parent. A parent, who was once always there, is now absent in the child's life and, the child will grieve their parent's absence.

  2. Examine recent trends in the use of custody in respect of juveniles over the ...

    A non-departmental public body, sponsored by the Home Office and accountable to the Home Secretary, its primary aim is to prevent offending by children and young people. More emphasis is placed on youngsters spending less time in custody and more time being supervised in the community.

  1. Should Justice be the Supreme Virtue of Societies

    From this it would be easy to conclude that justice is equality. However, this clearly is not the case as a large majority of states in the world are liberal democracies rather than communist states. The conclusion that may be drawn from this is rather more subtle.

  2. Expert Testimony and Its Value In the Justice System

    This figure correctly shows the chances of two children in one family having the syndrome. What it does not show are the chances of Sally Clark being innocent. By using the same statistic Sir Samuel Roy Meadow could also have taken into account unknown genetic factors and other variables which

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work