• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Argue for and against the incorporation of the Human Right Act into British law

Extracts from this document...


Politics essay Argue for and against the incorporation of the Human Right Act into British law. The Human Rights Act came in force in 2000 and has been successful in UK. This is because after a year Michael Beloff QC pointed out in The Times that 15% of the cases brought in the high court with Human Rights Act implication had been successful. The Act has the effect of in cooperating the European convention on Human Rights into British law. The home secretary Jack Straw said "these are the new rights for the new millennium. The Human Rights Act is the most important peace of constitutional legislation the UK has ever seen". A citizen is a member of state who expects the state to protect them but also has duties towards it. Being a good citizen means contributing to society and follows the law. Jack Straw described this as "Rights flow from duties-not the other way around. One person's freedom is another person's responsibility". The main reason for the new Human Rights bill is to protect citizens and their civil liberties under three categories-: fundamental rights such as to life, procedural rights such as the right to trail and qualified rights such as the freedom of expression. ...read more.


All these matters can now be protected in British courts. It is also true the political bodies must protect the rights or risk having to charge a decision or pay compensation. Parliament will legally stay sovereign. A determined-enough government, which feels that it has a mandate to set aside one of the rights contained in the convention, can do this if it can persuade parliament to back it. In such circumstances, there is nothing that the Judiciary can do about except to draw public attentions to the facts. There is basically going to be a balance of power between parliamentary sovereignty and the law. This is exactly what Professor Peele said that not only will there be a balance of power between the judiciary and Parliament but also the Act will put checks on parliament - "the human rights act is a dynamic piece of legislation with the potential to alter the balance between the government and the governed in a political system where hitherto there have been a few checks on the power of the state". The French philosopher Montesquieu introduced the area of the separation of power as an important part of representative government. ...read more.


In conclusion, the overall picture is mixed. Judges do have great powers, especially under the Human Rights Act, but they cannot overrule parliament and many of our rights remain rather vague. The judiciary cannot enforce rights against the will of a determined parliament. The independences of the judiciary mean that the political cannot interfere with judges. This means that the judges will take a neutral position in cases about the relations between the people and the government. Judges also must not be members of a political party or express political views. They should not just be independent; they must be seen to be independent. The importance of the act is that it might prevent government from abusing our rights. Ministers and civil servants will have to be careful in case a decision or a proposed law offends the act. This way the cause of human rights will be much advanced in Britain. We don't have a bill of rights like the US or France but we do have a set of rights - we need protection from the government minds (e.g. Blair went to war when the electorate was against it). ?? ?? ?? ?? 1 Zainab Hassanali ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sources of Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sources of Law essays

  1. Explain the distinction between the law and morals and consider the importance of the ...

    In the law on homicide contradictions between law and morality are rife. Some theorists believe that the two defences to murder (diminished responsibility and provocation) seem to suggest that people who use these defences successfully are less guilty than those who are convicted of murder because they receive a more

  2. "In form, the Human Rights Act (HRA) is compatible with parliamentary sovereignty. In practice, ...

    Kingland (2000) was concerned that under the Act, UK judges aren't affected by the jurisprudence of the ECtHR, but rather they need only have regard to it. He suggested that it might have been better if the government had simply produced a domestic Bill of Rights.

  1. Examine the relationship between law and morals and consider whether the law should support ...

    Problems arise, however, in defining who these others are (do they include embryos for example) and what is defined as harm (does it have to be direct interference)? An extension of this idea can be seen in the 'victimless crimes' debated by Edwin Schur in Crimes Without Victims.

  2. Unmarried fathers and their children - has the law got it right?

    It is reasonable to suggest that the use of the word 'responsibility' is more or less a deliberate shift in emphasis away from the focus of 'rights', which is intended to reinforce the view that parents should exercise their powers for the benefit of their children.

  1. AS LAW - Judicial Precedent

    1932 - 1978: little attempt was made by the courts to extend the scope of negligence. Courts were careful to find precedents. Then in 1978 came the decision in Anns v Merton Borough Council. This made local authorities liable for damages arising from negligent use (or non-use)

  2. Discuss whether incorporation of the European Convention on Human Rights into the domestic legislation ...

    The basis of the human rights has said to come from nine documents created after the Second World War. These are the United Nations Charter 1945, the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights 1948, the American Declaration of the Rights and Duties of Man 1948, the ECHR 1950, the European

  1. How has the European Court of Human Rights contributed to the protection of children's ...

    girl in the latter case against her parents, hence decision in her favour. Consequently, the strength of child's own private life as against parents and states' Art. 8(1), (2) right seems uncertain. A similar pair of contrasting cases is Koniarska v.

  2. Outcome (3): Analyse the provisions relating to the police powers of arrest, search, seizure, ...

    Once on the premises a constable has the power to seize or preserve such evidence. Section 60 of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 gives any police constable the power to search someone upon arrest. They have the power to do so if they have reasonable grounds for

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work