• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10

As a way for the English government to ensure that it attempted to certify UK nationals of their fundamental rights, the Human Rights Act was put into force on the 2nd of October of 2000

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

'The Human Rights Act in its present form, besides failing to properly incorporate the European Convention on Human Rights, gives the United Kingdom a defective law which puts it at the bottom of any international league table of bills of rights. The Act talks of rights, but keeps them at arms length and has as a consequence been hesitantly applied by the courts.' Discuss. Since 1966, Strasbourg was the final resort for British citizens to claim their rights. It was frequently criticised for its "long and expensive process [...] [which sometimes appeared] to be "Europe" imposing its will on the UK."1 As a way for the English government to ensure that it attempted to certify UK nationals of their fundamental rights, the Human Rights Act was put into force on the 2nd of October of 2000. However, the question is: How effective is the Human Rights Act of 19982 in delivering rights to British civilians? In its regard, the role of parliamentary supremacy and the courts in relation to the deficiencies of the Act in question, mainly sections 3, 4, 6 and 8 will be discussed in the following essay. Parliamentary sovereignty is the most crucial concern in the protection of human rights in UK. According to AV Dicey, the doctrine of parliamentary supremacy ruled the limits of its power by stating that it obtains "the right to make or unmake any law; and, [...] that no other person or body is recognized by the law of England as having the right to override or set aside [its] legislation". However, at this time, citizens had what its called 'liberties' which would allow them to do anything that law would not forbid. ...read more.

Middle

Furthermore, there is no express obligation upon courts to provide effective remedies which can occasionally leave applicants without one. Nonetheless, it is seen that at present, litigants are being granted successful remedies, which would be due to the court's attitude on "interpret[ing the act] in a broad and generous way to give effect to fundamental rights."18 As a result, although the act does not provide good clauses on remedies, the outcome of it is fairly successfully with the intention of protecting "an important constitutional instrument"19. With the principle of providing 'just satisfaction', damages can also be seen as deficient under the Act. Damages are not granted by all courts, they are very rare indeed and limited according to other remedies allowed. Besides, section 9 of the Act restricts the judiciary to award damages in criminal proceedings. However, if the judiciary provides damages, it comprises the possibility to award them on pecuniary (e.g. financial loss) and non-pecuniary loss (psychological distress). Moreover, if a litigant took his/her case to all courts and has not yet found an effective remedy, there is a possibility to apply to the European Court of Human Rights, which again is showing that the Act is inefficient. The role of British courts in this topic is incorporated in the traditional structure of the supremacy of parliament, in which its "sole power [...] is to decide and enforce what is the law and not what it should be"20 Furthermore, it is also seen how section 3 invites the courts to interpret statute in a best convention-compatible way that it could lead courts to interpret the meaning that Parliament wanted to give the ruling, which would revise it and not just interpret it as Lord Nicholls says in In Re S21. ...read more.

Conclusion

UKHRR 693 14 Aston Cantlow and Wilmcote with Billesley Parochial Church Council v Wallbank (2003) 15 Section 6 (3) states "In this section "public authority" includes (a) a court or tribunal" 16 In Re S (Minors) (Care Order: Implementation of Care Plan) [2002] 2 AC 291 17 "except to the extent they constitute infringements of the right of access to the court" - "Delivering Rights - How the Human Rights Act is working" Chapter: "Remedies for Breach of Human Rights: Does the Human Rights Act Guarantee Effective Remedies?" by Richard Clayton QC 18 Lord Hope in R. v DPP ex p Kebilene [2000] AC 326 19 Lord Bingham in Brown v Scott (Procurator Fiscal, Dunfermline) and another [2003] 1 AC 681 20 Lord Salmon in case of Blackburn v Attorney-General [1971] 2 All ER 1380 21 In Re S (Minors) (Care Order: Implementation of Care Plan) [2002] 2 AC 291 22 Lord Diplock in Human Rights Act at work" -Chapter 8: Human Rights Act at work: possibilities and problems. Article: "The Human Rights Act: uncertainly and unpredictability" p 220 Institute of Employment Rights London 2000 23 "Human Rights Act: A success Story?" Chapter: Resources, Rights and Environmental Regulation by Robert G. Lee p 116 24 "Human Rights Act at work" -Chapter 8: Human Rights Act at work: possibilities and problems. Article: "The Human Rights Act: uncertainly and unpredictability" p 218 Institute of Employment Rights London 2000 25 R. (Daly) v Secretariat of State for the Home Department [2001] 2 AC 532 26 David Lock in "Speech on Human Rights Act", 5th October 2000, http://www.dca.gov.uk/speeches/2000/dlcol051000.htm 27 Lord Irvine in "The Human Rights Act - So Far So Good", 14 February 2001, http://www.dca.gov.uk/speeches/2001/lc140201.htm ?? ?? ?? ?? 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sources of Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sources of Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    the english legal system unit1 assignment4

    4 star(s)

    a judicial system that relies heavily on oral trials, judges need clear argument and guidance to lead them to the correct decision. Such a service can only be provided by a select group of professional advocates. (b) Q: What are the advantages and disadvantages of there being a Ministry of Justice in the UK?

  2. Jury Essay

    view rather than the view of just one member of the judiciary system. The trial by jury is very old and people have confidence in the impartially and fairness of a jury trial. It is said that the public and the defendant would see the decision as a fairer as

  1. "In form, the Human Rights Act (HRA) is compatible with parliamentary sovereignty. In practice, ...

    Regarding the extent of incorporation, there is no question of the Convention rights in themselves "becoming part of our substantive domestic law" (HL Deb, 1997); rather, certain defined provisions of the Convention enjoy a defined legal status. The HRA does not incorporate the ECHR into domestic law in the way that the ECA 1972 incorporates the EC Treaty.

  2. 'The Human Rights Act 1998 has a significant impact on

    that meets the UK's ECHR obligations.8 Although, the Act does not enable courts to strike down legislation which is incompatible with the Convention, clause 3 requires the courts to read legislation in a way that 'so far as possible' gives effect to the Convention rights.9 Using the test on what

  1. To what extent do you think these aims have been (or will be) facilitated ...

    Land Law, Diane Chappelle, Pitman Publishing, p. 158 22 s. 3 (xvi) LRA 1925 "....all the incumbrances, interests, rights and powers not entered on the register, but subject to which registered dispositions are to take effect." 23 S. 70 (1)

  2. Parliamentary supremacy

    If it found that UK law is inconsistent with the treaties then this would automatically annul the law, since the European Communities Act 1972 in Section 2(4) states: '...any enactment passed or to be passed, other than one contained

  1. Discuss whether incorporation of the European Convention on Human Rights into the domestic legislation ...

    resulted in the UK changing its own domestic legislation on several occasions5 including the law relating to homosexuality in Northern Ireland being brought into line with the rest of the UK and dropping the policy stopping homosexuals joining the armed forces; This from the case of Saunders v UK6.

  2. Statutory Interpretation

    be incompatible, and certainly does not go that far as to allow judges to declare an Act of Parliament invalid. The declaration of incompatibility does not in any way, make the law invalid, bind the parties, or halt the continuation of the operations of the Act.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work