• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

As law assignment 2.2

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Assignment 2.2 Judicial Precedent The doctrine of judicial precedent, also known as Case Law, is a system often used within case law, is of relatively recent origin. It means that a judge deciding a case must follow earlier decisions of a higher court, or equal court in order to reach a decision (decisions in case law are known as judgements). Judicial precedent really started to gain full flow in the 19th century In 1833, as previous cases were already frequently referred to, Baron Parke (an important judge at the time) said that precedents must be regarded and referred to in all future cases, and that the courts could now not reject them. The case that Parke made his decision regarding precedent on was Mirehouse v Rennell 1833. That rule is still in effect today. The way that the system of judicial precedent works regarding the hierarchy of the courts is rather complex. Each court, when precedent is required, must use previous decisions of a superior or equal court. ...read more.

Middle

Obiter Dicta encompasses all parts of judgement not taken in with the ration decidendi. Judicial Precedent is well reputed as a good system, for many reasons are: * Certainty - Judges will not make their own random decisions, and litigants can plan their affairs, as they know that cases will be treated alike. * Detailed practical rules - Many statutes are often based on theory and logic, whereas judicial precedent is always based on real situations. * Free Market in Legal Ideas - A good example of this is the statement of the right wing philosopher Hayek, who believes that legislation should be almost non-existent, and that case law should become predominant. Therefore, Hayeks ideas see that law can develop in response to demand. * Flexibility - The law has to be flexible, and able to change quickly just as society does. With the system of judicial precedent, changes can be made in the law far quicker than if parliament were to make those changes. Of course, the system of judicial precedent is not without it's faults. ...read more.

Conclusion

The 1966 practice direction plays a major role in this aspect of law. The 1966 practice direction was a statement by the judicial section of the House of Lords. They said that they would modify their present practice, and that they would no longer be bound by it's own decisions. In my opinion, the entire English legal system should be able to use the 1966 practice direction, to make the system more simple. Another factor that plays a major role in this aspect of law is William Blackstone's declaratory theory. This theory states that judges do not make law, but merely, by the rules of precedent, discover and declare the law that has always been. Blackstone's declaratory theory. This theory is probably true, and I agree with it. Blackstone was a clever man, and this theory still makes sense today. Judges can be creative through case law as theyhave to act upon their best judgement to create new law. Alex Lyons 12SFBU 1 23/01/08 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Law of Tort section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Law of Tort essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Discuss the extent to which discrimination is prohibited under English and Welsh law (25 ...

    5 star(s)

    Act 2000 which allows transsexuals who register their new gender to be treated as such e.g. if they are born male and the become female. Another act which aims to prevent sex discrimination is the Civil Partnership Act 2004 which allows same sex partners to register their partnership and receive some of the benefits of marriages e.g.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Taking selected areas of the civil and or criminal law, evaluate whether sportsmen and ...

    4 star(s)

    An example of this would be the Football Association. In the case of Watson v British Boxing Board of Control [2001] QB 1134 a boxer claimed for a breach of duty for not receiving immediate ringside attention on the injuries he received.

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Critically evaluate the principles governing the law on Intoxication.

    3 star(s)

    The judge had concluded that drunkenness can only be used as a defence if the defendant was so drunk that he was incapable of forming specific intent for the offences. In crimes of basic intent the defendant is at fault for being reckless in becoming so drunk.

  2. UNIT3 ASSIGNMENT4 LAW OF TORT

    neighbour disputes - and there is nothing so difficult as neighbour disputes; the usually escalate out of all proportion. It is important that you are fully aware of the factors that will influence the court in deciding whether any particular events constitute a nuisance in the particular circumstances and also

  1. What is the meaning of intention in English criminal law? Is it always possible ...

    Even if a man should kill his terminally wife to end her suffering (his 'motive'), his intention to kill her counts as the mens rea for murder (Cocker [1989]).

  2. Three liability cases - Claim 1-- Auto Emergency Breakdown Service Claim 2- Santa ...

    While the main aim of tort proceedings is to compensate for harm suffered, contract aims primarily to enforce promises. Again, there are areas where these distinctions blur. In some cases liability in tort is clarified by the presence of agreement-for example, the duty owed by an occupier of land to

  1. In this report, the differences between contractual liability and tortuous liability are explained. In ...

    If an injury would have occurred independent of the defendant's conduct, cause in fact has not been established, and no tort has been committed. When multiple factors have led to a particular injury, the plaintiff must demonstrate that the tortfeasor's action played a substantial role in causing the injury.

  2. Tort law assignment. Brian fell against the standard of care a reasonable man would ...

    duty of care have been provided by the Court of Appeal in James McNaughten v Hicks Anderson 1991: The purpose for which the statement was made The purpose for which it was communicated The relationship between the person giving the advice, the person receiving the advice and any relevant third

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work