• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

As law assignment 2.2

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Assignment 2.2 Judicial Precedent The doctrine of judicial precedent, also known as Case Law, is a system often used within case law, is of relatively recent origin. It means that a judge deciding a case must follow earlier decisions of a higher court, or equal court in order to reach a decision (decisions in case law are known as judgements). Judicial precedent really started to gain full flow in the 19th century In 1833, as previous cases were already frequently referred to, Baron Parke (an important judge at the time) said that precedents must be regarded and referred to in all future cases, and that the courts could now not reject them. The case that Parke made his decision regarding precedent on was Mirehouse v Rennell 1833. That rule is still in effect today. The way that the system of judicial precedent works regarding the hierarchy of the courts is rather complex. Each court, when precedent is required, must use previous decisions of a superior or equal court. ...read more.

Middle

Obiter Dicta encompasses all parts of judgement not taken in with the ration decidendi. Judicial Precedent is well reputed as a good system, for many reasons are: * Certainty - Judges will not make their own random decisions, and litigants can plan their affairs, as they know that cases will be treated alike. * Detailed practical rules - Many statutes are often based on theory and logic, whereas judicial precedent is always based on real situations. * Free Market in Legal Ideas - A good example of this is the statement of the right wing philosopher Hayek, who believes that legislation should be almost non-existent, and that case law should become predominant. Therefore, Hayeks ideas see that law can develop in response to demand. * Flexibility - The law has to be flexible, and able to change quickly just as society does. With the system of judicial precedent, changes can be made in the law far quicker than if parliament were to make those changes. Of course, the system of judicial precedent is not without it's faults. ...read more.

Conclusion

The 1966 practice direction plays a major role in this aspect of law. The 1966 practice direction was a statement by the judicial section of the House of Lords. They said that they would modify their present practice, and that they would no longer be bound by it's own decisions. In my opinion, the entire English legal system should be able to use the 1966 practice direction, to make the system more simple. Another factor that plays a major role in this aspect of law is William Blackstone's declaratory theory. This theory states that judges do not make law, but merely, by the rules of precedent, discover and declare the law that has always been. Blackstone's declaratory theory. This theory is probably true, and I agree with it. Blackstone was a clever man, and this theory still makes sense today. Judges can be creative through case law as theyhave to act upon their best judgement to create new law. Alex Lyons 12SFBU 1 23/01/08 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Law of Tort section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Law of Tort essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Discuss the extent to which discrimination is prohibited under English and Welsh law (25 ...

    5 star(s)

    While indirect include cases such as Mandla v Dowell Lee where a Sikh boy was excluded from a school because he insisted on wearing his turban instead of the school cap. Allowing his claim that he was a victim of discrimination, the HOL said that although he could comply with

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Taking selected areas of the civil and or criminal law, evaluate whether sportsmen and ...

    4 star(s)

    2003 EWCA Civ 318 a referee of an adult amateur rugby match owed a duty of care to the players to take reasonable care for their safety when carrying out his refereeing duties and were his breach of that duty caused the claimants injuries.

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Critically evaluate the principles governing the law on Intoxication.

    3 star(s)

    He appealed and the Court of Appeal held it did not amount to involuntary intoxication and he was charged as though he had been voluntarily intoxicated. If the defendant had the required mens rea of the offence and the only effect of the alcohol was to make the defendant more

  2. What is the meaning of intention in English criminal law? Is it always possible ...

    Currently the specific rule about drunkenness is if you are so drunk so that you do not form the intent necessary, then you are permitted to be acquitted. However, the rule in D.P.P.

  1. UNIT3 ASSIGNMENT4 LAW OF TORT

    They refused to follow Miller -v- Jackson, feeling that it was wrong to allow a nuisance to continue merely because the wrongdoer is willing and able to pay for any injury he may inflict. * That the defendant's conduct would not have amounted to a nuisance had it not been for the contributory acts of others.

  2. Three liability cases - Claim 1-- Auto Emergency Breakdown Service Claim 2- Santa ...

    reference to vicarious liability and health and safety implications of his employees. 3d Advise Santa Rosa Institution related to general tortuous liability. Answer: An employer has a duty in law to see that reasonable care is taken to ensure the safety of employees; the duty is essentially the same as the usual duty of care in negligence.

  1. In this report, the differences between contractual liability and tortuous liability are explained. In ...

    Duty of care The first is the duty of care that must exist in the first instance. A duty of care is the obligation to avoid careless actions that could cause harm to one or more persons. It was established in Donoghue v.

  2. Tort law assignment. Brian fell against the standard of care a reasonable man would ...

    Is it fair just and reasonable to impose a duty of care? It was not held fair just and reasonable to impose a duty of care on the police as there was not a relationship of proximity in Hill v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work