• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess New Labour's constitutional reforms since 1997. Have they been successful?

Extracts from this document...


Assess New Labour's constitutional reforms since 1997. Have they been successful? Since 1997, New Labour have attempted to change the United Kingdoms partially codified constitution. Some of their reforms have been successful, whereas others, such as the Lords, have not yet been finalised. The Conservatives and the liberal Democrats have criticised these reforms, for a variety of reasons. The centrepiece of Labours 1997 manifesto was devolution to Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, which ensured a high percentage of votes in these area, contributing to Labours overwhelming majority in the House of Commons. Devolution is the transfer of powers from central government, in this case, Whitehall, to sub national institutions. The devolution gave the Scottish Parliament and the Northern Ireland assembly legislative and tax power, whereas the Welsh Assembly received only secondary legislative and executive powers, in 1998. This reform means that the United Kingdom is not a classic unitary state any more, rather a quasi-federal state, a move criticised by the opposition as an attempt to become 'Little America' (Michael Howard, 2001). ...read more.


Under the Human Rights Act, the UK's courts of law now have the power to hear cases on these rights, whereas before the Act, citizen had to go to Strasbourg. However, should a court find a piece of EU legislation not compatible with the Human Rights Act, they cannot overturn it, only suggest to Parliament to amend it as fast as possible.. In general, the opposition approve of this reform, although they feel it was not radical enough, by not restricting the executives power, and that the judges are not accountable for their judicial decisions. Labour had also pledged to introduce a Freedom of Information Act, and a white Paper was drafted in 1997. It requires public bodies to publish all information, excluding that which can be held on the basis of national security and public safety. However, citizens do not have an automatic right to see this information; it is only granted at the government's discretion. Another reform of Blair's was the House of Lords Act, in which he removed all bar 92 of the hereditary peers, replaced by elected officials. ...read more.


This reform has now been progressed to multiple other cities, including Hartlepool, Middlesbrough and Watford. After an independent body revealed that 93% of the UK believed that the British government was corrupt as a whole, after the Tories took a �450,000 donation from a fraudster, and the Labour party exempted Formula 1 from the ban on tobacco advertising after a �1 million bribe, Blair decided that there was a need for state funding of parties in order to bring a halt to the corruption of the political world. However, at the present time, nothing has been made in this direction. In conclusion, the reforms under Blair have been mixed in their success. Whilst devolution, the Human Rights Act, and the Freedom of Information Act have proved widely popular, the House of Lords and the Regional Assembly proposal are still to be completed. Others, such as the reform of the voting system, and party funding have yet to get under way, if, indeed, they ever will. ?? ?? ?? ?? Beccy McClure 3/2/2006 Government and Politics Essay Due Date: 7/2/2006 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sources of Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sources of Law essays

  1. Jury Essay

    This occurred in the case R v West (1996) where the defendant was convicted for killing ten young girls. This meant that the media were constantly trying to get stories and could have an effect of the jury. After found guilty the defendant appealed against the verdict stating that it was impossible to have a fair case due to

  2. How effective were the Liberal Reforms between 1906 and 1914?

    Inflation was reducing the real value of wages. The fact that no minimum wages were set in certain trades makes the government's attempt to improve the poverty situation even worse. A failure to introduce a set amount of working hours adds to this.

  1. Liberal reform 1906-1914

    Once the issue of Old Age Pensions was addressed, how ever limitedly, the government moved onto the problem of loss of earning due to unemployment or sickness. The general economic situation was becoming difficult for the lower income groups. Unemployment was rising and wages were falling, which made this a pressing issue.

  2. How successful were the Liberal Reforms of 1906-1914?

    Poverty was high as they had no successful financial backing from the government and could not make enough money working. The Old Age Pensions Act was introduced in 1908. The Act provided for pensions of 5s per week to be paid to those aged 70 or over who had annual incomes of �21 or less.

  1. Assess the constitutional significance of the decision of the House of Lords

    through a special derogation Order. It did so because it felt that there were foreigners living in the UK who were dangerous terrorists but who could not be deported because they would be in danger of suffering inhuman or degrading treatment, torture or even death if they were returned to their home country, something that would be in breach of the European Convention(art 3).

  2. Explain Why the Liberal Government Introduced a Series of Reforms Between 1906-1914. What Reforms ...

    given free school meals by local authorities, but this act was not made permanent till 1914, after being introduced in 1906, and only half the authorities introduced them. Compulsory medical checks were also given in 1907. These were done at schools and free medical treatment was to be provided by local education authorities.

  1. Who was the more successful president: JFK or LBJ?

    made further high level black appointments, such as the first black Americans to be part of the White House cabinet, and the first black Supreme Court judge. However, he was unable to prevent the bloody riots that took place in LA and Detroit as a result of growing racial tension,

  2. Judicial Reform and Bill of Rights.

    up, and it may lessen the chances of making a top judge as there would be more competition. To draw up league tables would be a short term advantage to make judges perform well, but it might turn into the same situation as we have with schools; the competition and

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work