• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the amount of protection which the law gives to a minor who enters a contract with an adult

Extracts from this document...


Assess the amount of protection which the law gives to a minor who enters a contract with an adult The basic principle of the present law is that a minor must be protected against his immaturity in his dealings with other persons. At the same time the policy of the law is to mitigate some of the hardships that might be imposed on persons dealing with a minor, so as to encourage them to enter into contracts that are for the minor's benefit. The contracts of a minor may be dealing with under the following three headings: contracts that are binding on the minor; contracts that are deemed void by the Infants Relief Act 1874; contracts that are binding on a minor unless and until he repudiates them. Where a minor enter into a contract with another person, whereby that person sells or supplies him with a necessary or necessaries, the contract will bind the minor. The courts have considered it in the minor's interest ( as well as that of the other party ) ...read more.


One exception to the rule is if the subject matter of the contract, with the minor, is considered necessaries. The Sale of Goods Act 1979 S.3 defines necessaries as goods that are suitable to the condition in life of the minor and to his actual requirement at the time of sale and delivery. Also, that the minor need only pay a reasonable price for the necessaries; which may not be the same as the contract price. Necessaries can include services such as education. In the English case of Nash v Inman the defendant, a tailor, supplied eleven fancy waistcoats and other items of clothing to a Cambridge undergraduate at a cost of �123. It was held that the tailor could not recover the money as the clothes were not "necessaries", the minor had a sufficient amount of his own clothes. Another exception to the rule is where a minor is bound by a service contract which is for their benefit. This does not mean that a minor is bound by any contract which is beneficial but only those which relate to an employment or similar contract. ...read more.


These have received special treatment, although (as Treitel points out) there is no logical reason why this should be so. However, the case law establishes that contracts concerning land, company shares, partnerships, family settlements and insurance are all voidable by the minor only if he denies the contract. Where a minor agrees to buy shares in a company then the contract is voidable at the minor's option. In Steinberg v Scala (Leeds) Ltd. a minor applied and partly paid for shares in the defendant company. However 18 months after the defendant company had allotted the minor the shares she decided to rescind the contract and also sued to recover the money she had initially paid to the defendant company. The court held that the plaintiff was entitled to rescind the contract and would not be liable to make any further payments. However she was not entitled to recover the money she had initially paid the defendant company because there was a sufficient amount of consideration as she had been allotted the shares. This area of contract law may need to be rethought and areas within it cleared up as there is no need for a lot of the confusion that it can lead to. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Law of Contract section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Law of Contract essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    "The requirement of consideration is an unnecessary complication in the formation of contracts."

    4 star(s)

    such as in the case of Anderson v Glass as the consideration is not provided in response to and in support of the promisor's promise. In the case of Roscarla v Thomas, it was held that the fact of the sale did not imply that that there was a warranty

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Contract Law - Offer And Acceptance

    3 star(s)

    JM Leigh guaranteed his brother's account to the extent of �100. Bradbury thereafter credited HJ Leigh in the usual way of their business. JM Leigh died but Bradbury, having no notice or knowledge of his death, continued to supply HJ Leigh with goods on credit.

  1. Four ways in which a contract may be discharged.

    The plaintiff supplied tyres to the defendant. The contract provided that the defendant would not re-sell them for less than the list price. If they breached this term then had to pay �5 for each tyre sold at less than the list price. Cine v United International Pictures [2003] EWCA Civ 1669.

  2. Contract Law

    Failure of a condition subject to which the offer was made If a condition upon which the offer is made is not fulfilled the offer will lapse (McCaul Pty Ltd v Pitt Club Ltd (1959)). e) Death If the offeror dies and the offeree has not been notified of

  1. Void and voidable Contracts.

    Karen has clearly asked the manager, who is an informed person, for the dimensions of the sofa. He has innocently misinformed her, thus inducing her to enter the contract. Therefore the contract is voidable and gives Karen the right to withdraw from the contract if she so wishes.

  2. Legal Studies Assess Two

    Eight families were robbed of family members and it would have been unfair if the violent offender was not brought to justice. 7. The verdict and whether it was a just outcome for the individual and society. The verdict returned by the jury was that of guilty.

  1. What is the importance of implied terms to the contract of employment

    Sometimes, it would appear that the terms implied into contracts of employment do not cause it to be so dissimilar from other forms of contractual arrangement. 1 Steve Anderman, Chapter 4 p62, Labour Law: Management Decisions & Workers' Rights 4th edition, Butterworths (2000)

  2. "It would be hard to over emphasise either the contribution made by implied terms ...

    licence, courts decided in express terms that he was required to hold a clean driving licence, even though it was not written in a statement. McIntosh did not win his case, as with all contract terms they have equal validity, and express terms will override implied terms.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work