• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the amount of protection which the law gives to a minor who enters a contract with an adult

Extracts from this document...


Assess the amount of protection which the law gives to a minor who enters a contract with an adult The basic principle of the present law is that a minor must be protected against his immaturity in his dealings with other persons. At the same time the policy of the law is to mitigate some of the hardships that might be imposed on persons dealing with a minor, so as to encourage them to enter into contracts that are for the minor's benefit. The contracts of a minor may be dealing with under the following three headings: contracts that are binding on the minor; contracts that are deemed void by the Infants Relief Act 1874; contracts that are binding on a minor unless and until he repudiates them. Where a minor enter into a contract with another person, whereby that person sells or supplies him with a necessary or necessaries, the contract will bind the minor. The courts have considered it in the minor's interest ( as well as that of the other party ) ...read more.


One exception to the rule is if the subject matter of the contract, with the minor, is considered necessaries. The Sale of Goods Act 1979 S.3 defines necessaries as goods that are suitable to the condition in life of the minor and to his actual requirement at the time of sale and delivery. Also, that the minor need only pay a reasonable price for the necessaries; which may not be the same as the contract price. Necessaries can include services such as education. In the English case of Nash v Inman the defendant, a tailor, supplied eleven fancy waistcoats and other items of clothing to a Cambridge undergraduate at a cost of �123. It was held that the tailor could not recover the money as the clothes were not "necessaries", the minor had a sufficient amount of his own clothes. Another exception to the rule is where a minor is bound by a service contract which is for their benefit. This does not mean that a minor is bound by any contract which is beneficial but only those which relate to an employment or similar contract. ...read more.


These have received special treatment, although (as Treitel points out) there is no logical reason why this should be so. However, the case law establishes that contracts concerning land, company shares, partnerships, family settlements and insurance are all voidable by the minor only if he denies the contract. Where a minor agrees to buy shares in a company then the contract is voidable at the minor's option. In Steinberg v Scala (Leeds) Ltd. a minor applied and partly paid for shares in the defendant company. However 18 months after the defendant company had allotted the minor the shares she decided to rescind the contract and also sued to recover the money she had initially paid to the defendant company. The court held that the plaintiff was entitled to rescind the contract and would not be liable to make any further payments. However she was not entitled to recover the money she had initially paid the defendant company because there was a sufficient amount of consideration as she had been allotted the shares. This area of contract law may need to be rethought and areas within it cleared up as there is no need for a lot of the confusion that it can lead to. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Law of Contract section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Law of Contract essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    "The requirement of consideration is an unnecessary complication in the formation of contracts."

    4 star(s)

    Casey Patents: Stewart v Casey where the court had tried to argue that there was an implied promise. Being so, there would be sufficient consideration and the relevant contract would be regarded as binding. The case of Pao On v Lau Yiu Long had subsequently provided some certainty by Lord

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Contract Law - Offer And Acceptance

    3 star(s)

    once the offeror is death the offer is invalid * But if the offer made to world at large then the issue of the offeror's death doesn't play any roles * However, acceptance made by offeree without knowledge of the death is not termination of offer but the offer should

  1. Four ways in which a contract may be discharged.

    THE REMEDY OF DAMAGES. "Unliquidated" - assessed by the courts. "Liquidated" - determined by the parties in a contractual term. The sum stated as liquidated damages must be a genuine pre-estimate of the actual loss likely to be suffered in the event of a breach.

  2. What is the importance of implied terms to the contract of employment

    698 17 Johnstone v Bloomsbury HA; [1992] Q.B. 333 Ottoman Bank v Chakarian [1930] A.C. 277; 18 Morrish v Henlys (Folkestone) [1973] 2 All E.R. 137; Gregory v Ford [1951] 1 All E.R. 121 19 This includes working in competition with him, disclosing confidential information to outside parties etc.

  1. Void and voidable Contracts.

    In that case Blackburn J stated: '...on the sale of a specific article, unless there be a warranty making it part of the bargain that it possesses some particular quality, the purchaser must take the article he has bought, though it does not possess that quality.'

  2. Contract Practice for Alpha construction LTD.

    which are required but is not part of the building itself i.e. preambles. Identified that specification and bills of quantities can be categorised under ?Written documentation? which purpose is to accompany the drawings and provide information which cannot be expressed in the form of illustrations.

  1. Aspects of the law affecting construction projects.

    If there is more than one defendant [tortfeasors] whose separate wrongs combined produce the same harm to the plaintiff they are both jointly and severally liable for the whole loss. If however one of the tortfeasors has to pay the whole amount or more than his fair share of such

  2. Aspects of Contract and Business Law Case Studies

    This meant that it was an invitation for the bidders to make an offer and it is up to the auctioneer to accept or reject the offers Therefore when the gavel falls it does not necessarily mean that. The bid of £19000 made by Tracy did not meet the reserve

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work