• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the amount of protection which the law gives to a minor who enters a contract with an adult

Extracts from this document...


Assess the amount of protection which the law gives to a minor who enters a contract with an adult The basic principle of the present law is that a minor must be protected against his immaturity in his dealings with other persons. At the same time the policy of the law is to mitigate some of the hardships that might be imposed on persons dealing with a minor, so as to encourage them to enter into contracts that are for the minor's benefit. The contracts of a minor may be dealing with under the following three headings: contracts that are binding on the minor; contracts that are deemed void by the Infants Relief Act 1874; contracts that are binding on a minor unless and until he repudiates them. Where a minor enter into a contract with another person, whereby that person sells or supplies him with a necessary or necessaries, the contract will bind the minor. The courts have considered it in the minor's interest ( as well as that of the other party ) ...read more.


One exception to the rule is if the subject matter of the contract, with the minor, is considered necessaries. The Sale of Goods Act 1979 S.3 defines necessaries as goods that are suitable to the condition in life of the minor and to his actual requirement at the time of sale and delivery. Also, that the minor need only pay a reasonable price for the necessaries; which may not be the same as the contract price. Necessaries can include services such as education. In the English case of Nash v Inman the defendant, a tailor, supplied eleven fancy waistcoats and other items of clothing to a Cambridge undergraduate at a cost of �123. It was held that the tailor could not recover the money as the clothes were not "necessaries", the minor had a sufficient amount of his own clothes. Another exception to the rule is where a minor is bound by a service contract which is for their benefit. This does not mean that a minor is bound by any contract which is beneficial but only those which relate to an employment or similar contract. ...read more.


These have received special treatment, although (as Treitel points out) there is no logical reason why this should be so. However, the case law establishes that contracts concerning land, company shares, partnerships, family settlements and insurance are all voidable by the minor only if he denies the contract. Where a minor agrees to buy shares in a company then the contract is voidable at the minor's option. In Steinberg v Scala (Leeds) Ltd. a minor applied and partly paid for shares in the defendant company. However 18 months after the defendant company had allotted the minor the shares she decided to rescind the contract and also sued to recover the money she had initially paid to the defendant company. The court held that the plaintiff was entitled to rescind the contract and would not be liable to make any further payments. However she was not entitled to recover the money she had initially paid the defendant company because there was a sufficient amount of consideration as she had been allotted the shares. This area of contract law may need to be rethought and areas within it cleared up as there is no need for a lot of the confusion that it can lead to. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Law of Contract section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Law of Contract essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    "The requirement of consideration is an unnecessary complication in the formation of contracts."

    4 star(s)

    Scarman in laying down the three conditions which are, the act constituting consideration must be done at the promisor's request, the parties must have understood that the work was to be paid at a later date and lastly, the promise would be legally enforceable should it has been made prior

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Contract Law - Offer And Acceptance

    3 star(s)

    JM Leigh's executors (Morgan) refused to pay, arguing that they were not liable as the debts were contracted and incurred after the death of JM Leigh and not in his lifetime. Judgment was given for the plaintiffs, Bradbury. Death Of Offeree * Can not be accepted after the offeree's death15 & 16 15Warrington LJ said that ' ...

  1. Void and voidable Contracts.

    Therefore the contract of the sale of the sofa is valid. 2. In this situation Sid, the owner of Scrumptious Sofas, has misinformed Karen when telling her the dimensions of the sofa. It must be noted though that he did not do this knowingly.


    to the other (the representee) which, while not forming a term of the contract, is yet one of the reasons that induces the representee to enter into the contract." (Cheshire) It is necessary to make a distinction between a term and other statements which may be made in the course of negotiations - representations.

  1. Advising a Client : Contract Law

    it is unlikely that a further use for them may be found. It may be that B would seek to rely on Tsakiroglou & Co. v. Noblee Thorl GmbH (1962) AC 93 where the court decided that circumstances such as reduced profitability, increased logistical hardship and inconvenience are not in themselves sufficient to frustrate the contract.


    A case relevant to this is Robertson v Anderson (2002) in the Mecca bingo hall in Drum chapel where in bilateral obligations are that the parties owe duties to each other. Case study 2 Morag would not get the furniture as the auctioneer hammer had not fallen so the sale

  1. Outline the basic rule of the law of contract regarding the effective revocation of ...

    is a reasonable way to accept an offer the acceptance is effective on posting The Household Fire v Grant. Thus Jane is in breach of contract. The situation could also be argued on a detrimental reliance part. It would be unfair if Jane was not in breach, since Louise did

  2. Contract Law

    Invitation to Treat An invitation to treat is an indicator of a parties willingness to negotiate entry into a contract. It is a technique used by a party who desire another party to make an offer and cannot be construed or the terms be accepted as if it were a valid legal offer in itself.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work