• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the impact of the European Convention on Human Rights on UK law.

Extracts from this document...


Assess the impact of the European Convention on Human Rights on UK law In democratic societies, it is usually felt that there are certain basic rights which should be available to everyone. These rights tend to vary in different legal systems but they generally include such freedoms as the right to say, think and believe what you like (freedom of expression, thought and conscience), and to form groups with others (freedom of assembly). Most democratic countries have a written Bill of Rights, which lays down the rights which, by law, can be enjoyed by citizens of that country. These rights have to be respected by the courts, parliament, the police and private citizens, unless the Bill of Rights allows otherwise. Such a Bill may form part of a written constitution or sit along side such a constitution: either way, it will usually have a status which is superior to that of ordinary law, in that it can only be changed by special procedure i.e. a referendum. Legislation, which is protected by special procedures, is said to be entrenched. Britain is unusual among democratic countries in having neither a Bill of Rights nor a written constitution. ...read more.


The main disadvantage of this idea of residual rights is that although the principle that a person is considered free to do anything not specifically prohibited by law which is fundamental to the idea of civil liberties, this principle also applies to the state, so that the government may violate individual freedom even though it is not formally empowered to do so, on the grounds that it is doing nothing which is prohibited. This was the main premise behind the case of Malone v Metropolitan Police Commissioner (1979). A significant change in the British position was made by the introduction of the Human Rights Act 1998 (discussed below). The Act will make the European Convention on Human Rights (also discussed below) part of the law of the UK. While the Convention is currently part of the international law that is recognised by the UK, it had never been integrated into our domestic law. The European Convention on Human Rights was drawn up by the Council of Europe, which was established after the Second World War when countries tried to unite to prevent such horrors ever happening again. Signed in Rome in 1950, the Convention was ratified by the UK in 1951 and became binding on the UK in 1953. ...read more.


As the Convention rights are very loosely drafted and through their interpretation the judges could easily dilute them and render them ineffective. In conclusion, the lack of a Bill of Rights, as discussed above, leaves British citizens in a very uncomfortable position. By incorporating the European Convention on Human Rights into domestic law through the Human Rights Act and not entrenching the Convention with a proper Bill of Rights, has enabled the executive to maintain the concept of parliamentary sovereignty. By doing so the executive has provided itself with several 'get-out-clauses' so that citizens rights may not be properly protected as the executive can itself remove certain rights as it sees fit. A good example of this is the situation at present where the government wishes to remove suspected terrorists right not to be detained without a fair trial. By entrenching the Convention UK citizens would have their rights protected and only through special procedures could parliament change such rights. Until this happens I do not believe that there will be a satisfactory situation within the UK, with regard to civil liberties. This essay comprehensively covers the factual areas of the implementation of the European Convention on Human Rights and also covers various opinions regarding the possible impact of the implementation of the European Convention on Human Rights on UK law and UK citizens. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sources of Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sources of Law essays

  1. Jury Essay

    This means that the jury may have reached their decision for the wrong reasons so the defendant has had an unfair trial. It was stated earlier that the fairness used in law is a good thing as it helps to keep equality in the case.

  2. Free essay

    How effective are domestic and international legal measures in dealing with human trafficking?

    It can be highlighted that many challenges can arise in prosecuting a matter of this nature. It seems that the central problems in identifying and effectively confronting human trafficking in Australia's experience are: the illegal and clandestine nature of the activity, bridging cultural and linguistic barriers to trust between prosecuting

  1. Free essay

    heirachy of civil courts

    Judges and advocate general are chosen from among persons of indisputable independence who fulfil the conditions required fro the holding of the highest judicial office in their respective countries or who are jurists of recognised competence. Alternatives to the ordinary civil courts As we have seen, criminal problems are dealt with by the state through criminal courts.

  2. The Land Registration Act 2002 heralds major changes to the law and procedures regarding ...

    The true owner was given priority to take action accordingly and the successfulness of the squatter will depending on how he reacts upon the notice that had been given to him. If the true owner fails to act decisively to oppose the squatter's application within the specified time, then only the squatter will has the chance to possess the land.

  1. "In form, the Human Rights Act (HRA) is compatible with parliamentary sovereignty. In practice, ...

    However, Bradley (2004) argued that the Act has "enabled there to be judicial review of legislation in all but name" by providing courts with a dual function to apply the rule of interpretation and, failing that, to make a declaration of incompatibility.

  2. 'The Human Rights Act 1998 has a significant impact on

    this 'vagueness' of the term "public authority" by defining it as "any person concerned with the provision to the public (whether payment or otherwise) of any goods, facilities or services." This would have made every window cleaner, newsagent and striptease artiste a public authority so this was happily withdrawn.7 Public

  1. Unmarried fathers and their children - has the law got it right?

    The Current law in relation to unmarried fathers and their children does not only appear unjust in various places, but it is also quite confusing. Men are considered fathers when it comes to responsibilities such as paying child support, but not when it comes to legal rights.

  2. Extradition of terrorists

    'whether the prosecution evidence, taken at its highest, is such that no jury properly directed could properly convict upon it.' Important case law surrounding liability for extradition and relevant to this area of law can be found in the case of Re Ismail3 where it was held that extradition is

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work