• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess theeffectiveness of the Law in Achieving Justice for Indigenous People.

Extracts from this document...


Assess the effectiveness of the Law in Achieving Justice for Indigenous People. In relation to Australia, the term 'Indigenous peoples' refers to two distinct cultures of people who inhabited the land prior to European settlement - The Aboriginals and the Torres Strait Islanders. This population declined dramatically over the 19th and early 20th century due to the introduction of new diseases from European settlement, Government policies of dispersal and dispossession, the era of protection, assimilation and integration causing a cultural disruption and disintegration of the Indigenous peoples. In the 20th century the recognition and protection of Indigenous peoples land rights and human rights have been at the forefront of Global Issues where the International community has sought to address the issues and ratify Human Rights and Land Rights for Indigenous People as a legitimate subject to be implemented into international law and the domestic law of member states such as Australia. To evaluate the effectiveness of the law in achieving justice for Indigenous Australians we must look at the Australian Legal System, and the extent to which it addresses it's obligations to International Law in relation to Australia's Indigenous People. In evaluating the Legal System's response to Indigenous People and it's achieving of justice, an outline of the history of Indigenous Australians - before and during settlement - as well as their status in Australian society today must be made. The dispossession of their land and culture has deprived Indigenous People of economic revenue that the land would have provided if not colonised, as well as their tradition, culture, language and spirituality - of which they were almost entirely robbed. Prior to the colonisation of Australia in 1788, the indigenous peoples lived in harmony with the land - hunting what they required to survive and preserving the environment through calculated methods of harvesting. They extracted only what was necessary and provided the land with enough time to regenerate. ...read more.


With the removal of Section 127, Aboriginal people could be included in the national census, which meant they were given the same citizen rights as other Australians. It changed the Constitution, meaning that the Commonwealth, as well as the States, had the rights to make laws on Aboriginal issues. The policy of integration, which was adopted in the early 1970s, took a less arrogant stance than the assimilation policy. Integration refers to those policies that do not suggest the necessary loss of any individual's original language and customs but nevertheless, see their principal value in their utility as a means to full participation in an integrated culture. Australia's integration policy recognised the rights of Aboriginal people to maintain their traditions, culture and language, as well as choose to live in their own communities. Australia ratified the Convention on the Elimination of all forms of Racial Discrimination (CERD) on 30 September 1975 and implemented the Convention primarily through the Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (Cth). This was an important standard set in accordance of the International Community eliminating racial discrimination which entered force in 1969. CERD obligates states to take strict measures in certain circumstances including cultural, economic and social fields, to ensure development of racial groups such as Indigenous Australians enjoy human rights and fundamental freedoms in their circumstances. The recent development over the past few years was the introduction of the Racial Hatred Act on 1 October 1995. It declares civil prohibition on offensive, insulting, humiliating or intimidating behaviour based on sex. Also allowing a way in which complaints may be lodged with the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission for people affected by racially offensive conduct showing the Australian Government ratified international law to achieve justice for Indigenous Australians. However, the ratification of the convention and implementation of the Racial Discrimination Act does not mean that injustice is no longer felt by Indigenous Australians. ...read more.


This means that it may be inadequate in addressing the issue of dispossession for Indigenous People making it ineffective to the international obligations set out by Convention 61 of the International Legal Organisation. In August 1993 after the case of Mabo - the Wik people lodged proceedings under the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) and in January 1996 the Federal court ruled that in the Wik case pastoral leases extinguished native title. This was taken to the high court and on the 23 December 1996, ruled Native title could survive on pastoral leases. This was considered to be a major victory to Indigenous People though the official government response to this ruling was the 10 point Wik plan, and resulting legislation, the Native Title Amendment Bill 1997 (Cth), which currently endangers Indigenous Peoples Land Rights where it's claimed by Indigenous Peoples organisations to introduce a means for the extinguishment of Native Title on pastoral leases and continuing the doctrine of Terra Nullius. This government response has attracted international criticism at a UN Geneva forum in July 1997. It was said the NativeTitle Act amendments "have the potential to seriously derogate from Australia's international obligations". This once again shows the ineffectiveness of the Australian Legal System achieving justice for Indigenous Australians by not clarifying it's stance on it's international obligations to Indigenous Australians or reflecting it's international rhetoric and signature on UN conventions by implementing some in domestic law. This inadequacy in the development of Indigenous Peoples Land Rights in Australia has been declared by the Working Group on Indigenous Populations in July 1997, and highlights the Australian government policy regarding Indigenous Peoples Land Rights and may be argued as a denial of justice for Indigenous People by the Australian legal system. Australia can be said to be ineffective in achieving justice for Indigenous People due to it's failure to recognise Indigenous Australians rights to land domestically by failing the Human Rights standards contained in international initiatives to which it is a signatory. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sources of Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sources of Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Critically discuss different possible meanings of justice and explore the relationship between law and ...

    3 star(s)

    The main proponents of this theory are; John Stuart Mill and Jeremy Bentham. They believe that a law is just if it benefits the majority of the people even if it results with injustice for the minority. Proponents do not only have a look at the law, but also take

  2. "The main aims of the Land Registration Acts were to give certainty to title ...

    because it is just, any claim must fall clearly within one of the eight statutory grounds set out in S.82. The rectification must be sought from the state and the circumstances in which an indemnity may be awarded are narrow, this is shown in cases regarding overriding interests.

  1. Free essay

    How effective are domestic and international legal measures in dealing with human trafficking?

    These recent changes to the Australian law show a growing commitment within the government and legal community to manage human trafficking and sex slavery. These steps have been significant, but there is still much work in the field that needs to be accomplished.

  2. Commercial law discussion - 'Transfer of Title by a Non-Owner'.

    delivery or transfer by that person...of the goods or documents of title, under any sale pledge or other disposition thereof, to any person receiving...in good faith and without notice of any lien or other right of the original seller... has the same effect as if the person making the delivery

  1. Understanding Young People, Law and Order

    However you will not be compelled to give your name in order for the call to be acted upon and for help to arrive. Non-emergency situations In non-emergency situations you should usually contact the local police in the area where the crime has taken place.

  2. Unmarried fathers and their children - has the law got it right?

    must either obtain it from the court, have a formal agreement with the mother or if the child is adopted it can be gained by registering the child's birth jointly with the mother.16 It is apparent that several of the arguments in favour of improving the position of unmarried fathers

  1. To what extent do you think these aims have been (or will be) facilitated ...

    On the 26th February 2002, the Land Registration Act 2002 received Royal Assent and is due to be brought into force on the 13th October 2003, is going to replace the existing statutory framework for land registration; we have in our midst what some might say a 'revolution'37.

  2. The Nature of Law in Society

    Where Parliament fears to tread it is not for the courts to rush in." However Viscount Simonds stated that"In the sphere of criminal law I entertain no doubt that there remains in the Courts of Law a residual power to enforce the supreme and fundamental purpose of the law, to

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work