• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Bail. Under S.4 of the Bail Act 1976 there is a presumption that un convicted suspects will be given bail. This ties in with the fact that everyone is innocent until proven guilty

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Assignment 2.11 Bail means a person is allowed to be at liberty, rather than held in custody while awaiting the next stage of the case. The right to bail has been reduced in recent years amid concern that individuals on bail reoffend and fail to turn up at court for their trial. Fourteen percent of those bailed to appear at court fail to do so according to the Criminal Justice Statistics 2003, another statistic says nearly twenty-five percent of defendants commit at least one offence while on bail. The criteria for granting or refusing bail are contained in the Bail ct 1976. There is a general presumption in favour of bail for un convicted defendants but there are some important exceptions. Bail need not be granted where there are substantial grounds for believing that, unless kept in custody, the accused would fail to surrender to bail, or would commit an offence and the probable sentence, along with the character, antecedents, associations and community ties of the defendant. ...read more.

Middle

If the bail is granted then the suspect is released under the duty to attend court or the police station at a given time. In assessing these risks, the court may take account of the nature and seriousness of the offence and the probable sentence, along with the character, antecedents associations and community ties of the defendant. A court considers the question of bail must take into account any drug miss use by the defendant. The courts are governed by the provisions found in the 1976 Bail Act and there is a presumptive right to bail under s.4 and it can only be refused on conditions set out in the Act. But the underlying doctrine is clear- unnecessary report to custody is as legally wrong as it is morally offensive. When it comes to deciding whether grounds exist for refusing bail, the courts take into account. The Courts and police may refuse to give bail if * Bail need not be granted where are substantial grounds for believing that, unless kept in custody ...read more.

Conclusion

The accused will usually be allowed only one further bail application the court does not have to hear further applications unless there has been a change in circumstances. When the remand in custody is on the basis of insufficient information, this is not technically a refusal of bail, so the accused may still make two applications. Bail can be granted subject to conditions, such as that the accused obtain legal advice before their next court appearance. When the defendant is on remand they lose precious time they could be spending with their family before the case. Some people on average are on remand from between six to twelve months. One advantage of criminals being remand for the public are the public feel more safe when the criminal is in prison, for the government when criminals are in remand, the community people live in looks safe. Lastly when criminals are in remand the police also have one less criminal too worry out. 60% of those refused remand are finally acquitted or given non custodial bail. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Machinery of Justice section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

Summary: a basically accurate outline of when bail should be granted in criminal cases. There is some repetition and some comments need further development.
Rating: ***

Marked by teacher Nick Price 01/05/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Machinery of Justice essays

  1. International Institutions and Human Rights. The three international institutions and their impact on ...

    It was formed in 1949, after the end of the Second World War. NATO member countries agree that if any one country is attacked, the other countries will come to help them. It's hoped this will stop military attacks on any NATO country.

  2. Critically analyse the relationship between law and justice.

    Austin's definition is also inexact due to the new system of judicial review and the European courts; which both allow us to challenge laws made by the state, removing the positions of "inferior" and "superior", and in my opinion, creating an equality between state and citizen.

  1. Free essay

    Critically discuss whether the criminal courts of England and Wales require substantial reform. Firstly ...

    Either way offences are indictable offences which can be tried in the Magistrates Court or Crown Court depending on the nature of seriousness of the case. Examples include theft, assault causing actually bodily harm and counterfeiting offences. All criminal cases start in the magistrates' court.

  2. Free essay

    Law and Justice

    This means that as there is no knowledge of people's gender, religion, age or social class, no pre-conceptions will exist. Rawls believes that this ignorance is the only way to reach fair decisions and for justice to be served. Michael Allen also suggests this, as in 'Criminal Law' he states

  1. Demonstrate your understanding of both the UK civil and criminal court systems and their ...

    'In a criminal case the state prosecution must argue that the 'burden of proof' is 'beyond reasonable doubt'. In a civil case the arbitrator must consider that the burden of proof is the 'balance of probabilities'. You cannot be arrested or imprisoned for a civil matter, but you can for a criminal matter.

  2. Law and Justice Essay

    Rawls said that the only way to achieve true justice is if we create an 'original position'. His point being that the people who make the laws have their own agenda, so you can't achieve true justice. Robert Nozick thought that if you get wealthy legally and fairly then it should be yours to keep.

  1. Explain the role of the CCRC (Criminal Cases Review Commission)

    The commission is more commonly known as the Runciman Commission. It was established under the Criminal Appeal Act 1995. The CCRC are an independent body and does not represent the police. The CCRC is NOT a Court of Appeal but it is a means of bringing possible miscarriages of justice

  2. Describe the use of the Practice Statement using the sources and other cases. [15 ...

    In R V Caldwell, it was decided that the test for recklessness was objective since the reasonable man would foresee a risk. However, R V G&R overruled this decision to provide clarity in the law, and decided the test was subjective and whether the defendant themselves would foresee a risk rather than the reasonable man.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work