• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Barristers and Solicitors

Extracts from this document...


(a) Outline the work undertaken by barristers and solicitors. For more than a hundred years the legal profession in England and Wales has been divided into barristers and solicitors, and each branch has until recently had its own role to play. Solicitors are traditionally seen as the general practitioners of the legal profession, providing advice to the public across a wide legal spectrum, while barristers are seen primarily as advocates. Neither of these pictures is completely true. Many solicitors do still work in "High Street" offices and offer general legal advice and other legal services to the public at large. Most "High Street" firms give advice and assistance in the drafting and execution of wills, in conveyancing, in family disputes, in personal injuries claims, and in criminal matters, and many deal with other areas such as employment law, immigration law and housing law. In these fields they can give initial advice, can try to negotiate a settlement, can draft contracts and other documents, and can sometimes represent their clients in court if necessary. ...read more.


In the past fifteen years, a number of changes in law and practice have broken down the barriers between barristers and solicitors (and those between solicitors and other law workers), so that the former rigid distinctions have been blurred. There are very few legal jobs that are now the monopoly of one or other branch of the profession, though individual lawyers have unsurprisingly been slow to change the working habits of a lifetime. The most obvious example of this is in relation to rights of audience - the right to represent a client in court. Solicitors have always had a right of audience in the lower courts, but since 1990 they have been able to apply for rights of audience in higher courts such as the Crown Court and the High Court. They can thus obtain the rights barristers have always enjoyed, though so far only about 1000 solicitors (out of 80 000 or so) have taken advantage of the opportunity. As an extension of this, solicitors are now eligible for appointment as Queen's Counsel and as High Court judges, though only very few have actually been appointed. ...read more.


Again, it used formerly to be the case that solicitors were spread fairly evenly across the country while barristers worked mainly in London. That distinction too is blurring to some extent: although barristers are more numerous in London than elsewhere, they can be found in all provincial Crown Court centres. On the other hand, the growth of the very large City firms has led to an increasing concentration of solicitors in the capital. The differences that remain on paper are almost trivial. Barristers (but not solicitors) are theoretically bound by the "cab-rank rule", though in practice any barrister who wanted to refuse a case could almost certainly do so. Barristers wear wigs in court, while solicitors do not. And barristers are paid an agreed fee for the case, rather than an hourly rate like solicitors. All these things could very easily change. Which leaves only the question why barristers and solicitors are still regarded as members of two separate professions with different qualification and training requirements. The distinctions are now so blurred that it is surely time to establish a single profession with a single membership qualification, whose members might still specialise to a greater or lesser extent as they chose. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Law of Tort section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Law of Tort essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Taking selected areas of the civil and or criminal law, evaluate whether sportsmen and ...

    4 star(s)

    The reasonable man test is an objective test, chosen because a subjective test would be impossible. The classic statement was given by Alderson B in Blyth v Birmingham waterworks Co (1856) 11 Ex 781 'negligence is the omission to do something which a reasonable man, guided upon those considerations which

  2. What is the meaning of intention in English criminal law? Is it always possible ...

    appreciates the risk but goes ahead anyhow and entails the conscious running of an unjustifiable risk and as such is foresight. E0E Visit coursework ea in ea fo ea for ea more hypothesis ea Do ea not ea redistribute E0E In R.

  1. I am the company solicitor for Everlasting Estates Ltd., and have been required to ...

    report for the Board of Directors of Everlasting Estates, explaining the company's liability and any defenses which the company may rely on. To: The Board of Directors of Everlasting Estates Ltd. From: Farah Butt Date: 30th May 2002 Report Findings - Problem 1 One of the Heavy Goods Vehicle drivers,

  2. Intoxication – The Legal Viewpoint.

    defend himself; in doing so, he actually killed V by cramming eight inches of sheet down her throat. He was acquitted of murder because the jury were not sure that he had the necessary intention, being intoxicated, but convicted of manslaughter.

  1. Jenny had an argument with her boyfriend, David, which resulted in David throwing Jenny ...

    Similarly the courts are reluctant to convict a person if he has only the mens rea of an offence and does not commit the actus reus at the same time. However in cases such as Thabo Meli v R and Fagan v Metropolitan Police Commissioner the courts are prepared to


    Causation is both a question of fact and law. It has to be first established that there is a factual link between Tom's act (of steering the car into the ditch) and Sara's death. This is resolved by applying the 'but-for' test - 'but for' the act of Tom would Sara have died?

  1. In the scenario for this report the parties have committed certain crimes - give ...

    While the MR is 'dishonesty with the intention to permanently deprive'. Elizabeth clearly appropriated the can of polish and coffee and 'assumed the rights of owner'5. The leading case in this area is Gomez (92)6 the case mainly centred on where there were no stolen goods but also it was

  2. In this report, the differences between contractual liability and tortuous liability are explained. In ...

    v Kingston and Saint Andrew Corp. 1989. To claim for damage, plaintiff have to show that the tortfeasor was actually in the employment relationship with that employer and the negligence act occurred in the course of his employment (Honeywill v Larkin 1934).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work