• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Briefly Explain The Meaning Of These Terms: Actus Reus And Mens Rea

Extracts from this document...


Briefly Explain The Meaning Of These Terms: Actus Reus And Mens Rea Actus Reus means the 'guilty act' this must be voluntary. For example if a swarm of bees enter a car window and the drivers swerves, injuring someone, then he will not be liable because it wasn't voluntary. The Actus Reus may be an act, a failure to act or a state of affairs. The act may be direct or indirect action. Examples of a direct act could be battery or rape where the defendant makes contact with the claimant. An example of an indirect act could be where somebody shoots another, for this they would need to establish a chain of causation; to decide that pulling the trigger led to the claimant's injury. ...read more.


For example if you see someone drowning, failing to rescue them will not result in you being liable, however, if you are a lifeguard it is your contractual responsibility to act and save them. A state of affairs is being in a particular state or place, which makes you automatically liable for the offence. For example being drunk on a public highway makes you automatically liable for the offence. Mens Rea is the guilty state of mind and refers to the intention element of a crime. The level of blameworthiness varies from crime to crime; there is intention, recklessness, and negligence. Mens Rea can mean on purpose or deliberately, although it is much broader than the layperson realises because it can also mean the person knowingly or maliciously caused the event. ...read more.


Recklessness is another type of Mens Rea needed to prove a defendant to be guilty of certain crimes. The defendant is aware of an unjustifiable risk occurring as a result of their actions yet still carry on. There are two types of recklessness, Caldwell and Cunningham. Cunningham (or subjective) recklessness can be defined in the case of R v Cunningham where the defendant broke into a house to steal money from the gas meter and was charged with "maliciously administering a noxious thing as so to endanger life." The defendant realised there was a risk of harming someone yet still carried on. The third type of Mens Rea is negligence; this is where the defendant has acted carelessly resulting in damage or injury occurring. There are only a few examples of this but they included driving offences and manslaughter. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Law of Tort section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Law of Tort essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Taking selected areas of the civil and or criminal law, evaluate whether sportsmen and ...

    4 star(s)

    This is shown in the cases above where similar leg and feet injuries which occurred at work were awarded damages for negligence, just as with the football players. This is in contrast to criminal proceedings which it seems lesser sentences are given to the offending party and it may be said special allowance is given to the sports player.

  2. What is the meaning of intention in English criminal law? Is it always possible ...

    GD0P Visit coursework ae in ae fo ae for ae more dissertation ae Do ae not ae redistribute GD0P This suggests that a jury must decide as a fact whether the defendant possessed the necessary intent, but that they may use evidence that a reasonable person would have intended the result as a guide.

  1. Using actual situations, describe the elements of actus reus and mens rea in criminal ...

    Expressed intention (the same as expressed malice aforethought) is where the defendant's actions were intended to lead to the death of the victim whilst implied intention is where the defendant went with the intention of committing grievous bodily harm, but went to far in his actions and killed the victim.

  2. Criminal liability is generally based on fault with the prosecution having to prove both ...

    There are 5 ways in English law in which a person will commit the actus reus of a crime if he fails to act: 1.

  1. Gross negligence and recklessness.

    In Caldwell (1981) the accused had done some work for the owner of as hotel but had then quarrelled with him. He got drunk and then had set fire to the hotel in revenge. He was charged with two offences - the first under s.1 (1)

  2. Any crime in law is made up of two elements, the actus reus which ...

    A serious breach which is sufficient to justify criminal liability would find the defendant guilty of gross negligence as shown in R v. Adamako (1994). Transferred malice is when the mens rea is transferred from the intended victim to the actual victim. This is shown in R v. Mitchell (1983).

  1. Explain in detail what actus reus and the chain of causation actually means.

    This decides 'but for' the action of the defendant, would the consequence still have happened. In this case, the answer is no as the victim wouldn't have had to be taken to hospital 'but for' the actions of the defendant so he is still guilty.

  2. In this report, the differences between contractual liability and tortuous liability are explained. In ...

    This regulation can also be applied in this case. As Anthony and Maria are doing their own business that is self-employment, they owed a duty to persons other than employees, which is stated in the Act that they are responsible to ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, their undertaking

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work