• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Briefly explain what is meant by the doctrine of judicial precedent.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Briefly explain what is meant by the doctrine of judicial precedent. (10 Marks) Judicial precedent refers to the sources of law where past decisions made by judges create law for future judges to follow. The English system of precedent is based on stare decisis, which translated from Latin loosely means "To stand by what has been decided". Stare decisis provides fairness and certainty in the law. It is divided into two parts: ratio decidendi and obiter dicta. Ratio decidendi are the principles of law that a judge has used to come to the decision at the end of a case, which is outlined in his speech. Ratio decidendi loosely means "Any rule expressed or implied by the judge as a necessary step in reaching his conclusion". Obiter dicta refers to "the other things said" by the judges and does not have to be followed by future judges. An example of this may include what the judge's decision would have been if the facts were different but does not have to followed as it is not binding precedent. ...read more.

Middle

The highest court affecting our legal system is the European Court of Justice (ECJ). A decision made by this court is binding on all other courts. Below the ECJ, is the House of Lords and its decisions bind all other courts in the English Legal system. Below the House of Lords is the Court of Appeal (civil and criminal division), Divisional Courts (Queen's Bench, Chancery and Family), the High Court, the Crown Court, the County Court and the Magistrate's Court. County Court and Magistrate's Court do not create precedent and are bound by all higher courts. It was decided that the House of Lords should have more flexibility. Since 1966, the Practice Statement has allowed the House of Lords to change the law if it believes that an earlier case was wrongly decided. The first major use of the Practice Statement was in Herrington v British Railways Board (1972), which involved the law on the duty of care owed to a child trespasser. ...read more.

Conclusion

The law becomes very precise as it gradually builds up through the different variations of facts in the cases which come before the courts. Another advantage is that there is room for the law to change as the House of Lords can use the Practice Statement to overrule cases (a decision which states that a legal rule in an earlier case is wrong). Judicial precedent can also be time-saving. The disadvantage to precedent is that the law can become too rigid seeing as the lower courts are bound by the higher courts and the Court of Appeal has to follow its own past decisions. Also, the process is quite complex seeing as there are thousands of reported cases and it is often quite difficult to extract the ratio decidendi from a case. Furthermore, the differences between some cases may be very small and appear illogical. The growth of precedent is slow and some areas of the law are unclear or in need of reform however, judges cannot make a decision unless there is a case before the courts to be decided. ?? ?? ?? ?? Uzmah Rashid November 10, 2008 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sources of Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

This is a generally accurate answer, which at times contains some case authority and examples in support of the basic description. It is important to just answer the set question - not to include irrelevant material such as advantages and disadvantages.
Rating ***

Marked by teacher Nick Price 14/03/2012

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sources of Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Common Law and Equity

    5 star(s)

    From that time on the common law and equity worked together, side by side. The disputes between the two systems continued for a long time, but gradually faded away as equity developed case law and recognisable principles and was no less rigid than the common law.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Common Law and Equity - its history and development

    3 star(s)

    In the end the King choose equity, so this means whenever the two systems clash, equity will always be victorious. Explain the effect of the Judicature Acts 1873-1875 The Judicature Acts 1873-1875 established the basis of the court structure we have today Judicature Acts combined the two laws together so

  1. Common Law and Equity Essay

    The other maxim is that "he who comes to equity must come with clean hands", this illustrates that whoever uses equitable remedy must have acted equitably them selves as well. This maxim was used in the case of D&C Builders v Rees, in this case the couple were not allowed

  2. Look Back In Anger - Form and Structure

    This makes it easier to read and you can follow it more. This maintains the realism of the play and focuses the audience's attention on the outcome. Osborne repeatedly uses monologues throughout the play. He doesn't use other dramatic techniques such as choruses, tableaux or epilogues because these techniques would

  1. Free essay

    How effective are domestic and international legal measures in dealing with human trafficking?

    Act 1999. This act established legislation to formally criminalise trafficking and related crimes, and increase penalties for trafficking related offenses. It was this very legislation that was to serve the purpose of providing the Australian Government with the precision and authority to pursue an aggressive criminal justice response.

  2. Why was the Apprenticeship system brought to an end in 1838 in the British ...

    The Imperial Abolition Act had stated that no compensation would be paid to the planters of the colonies unless the legislature had made satisfactory provision for outing into effect the imperial act with their adjustments. The final details of the act had to be worked out by the legislature, thus

  1. explain judicial precedent

    The case does not normally contest the validity of the law it just looks at the facts of the argument. If when the decision comes the loosing party does not the result or disputes the fairness of the law it can go to appeal.

  2. Explain what is meant by the doctrine of parliamentary supremacy and briefly explain one ...

    The parliament is limited as all legislation passed by them must meet the terms of the HRA. The Act states that a Minister must declare that the bill is compatible with the HRA before the second reading; if it is unsuitable it may be cancelled or refused application for subordinate

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work