• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10

British Law in Health and Social Care

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

British Law in Health and Social Care Victoria Smith 01/11/2010 Table of Contents Introduction 3 British Legal System 3 Statute Law 3 European Law 3 Common Law 3 Duty of Care 4 Negligence 5 Tort Law 5 Trespass 5 Trespass to the person 6 Consent 6 Legislation 6 Word Count 8 Bibliography 8 Introduction The purpose of this report is to explain the basis of Common or Judge-made Law. To explain duty of care, negligence, trespass, and consent and the last three as legal responsibilities. And to explain how specific legislation such as The Children Act and Mental Health Acts instruct health care practitioners as to their legal responsibilities. British Legal System There are three parts of the British legal system these are; Statute Law, European Law, and Common Law. Legislation includes statutes and Acts of Parliament. British Law falls into two categories: criminal law, and civil law. Criminal laws are offences relating to persons or property that affects the whole community. Civil law is wrong relating to conflicts between individuals within the community. I will write a little about Statute and European Law but I will concentrate on Common Law. ...read more.

Middle

B is that the actions of the health care practitioner fell short of the duty of care identified in A. And C is that this action leads to damages occurring. Negligence is a part of Tort law. Tort Law Tort law exists to protect rights; it defines rights and obligations when an individual commits a wrong or injury against another person. There are six classifications of tort law these are; "Wrongs to the person, wrongs to reputation, wrongs to property, wrongs to persons or property, wrongs of interference, and abuse of legal procedure." (Curzon, 2002) The law uses one standard to judge all people not on the individual. Trespass Trespass is an area of tort law broadly divided into three groups; trespass to the person, trespass to chattels and trespass to land. Trespass to chattels is a tort whereby the infringing party has intentionally interfered with another person's lawful possession of the chattel. Trespass to land is a common law tort that is committed when an individual or the object of an individual intentionally enters the land of another without lawful excuse. (Fleming, 1998) Trespass to the person Trespass to the person may be by assault, battery, or false imprisonment. ...read more.

Conclusion

This can be the rights of the client (and relatives etc) or the rights of the worker (which at times may be in conflict). In everyday practice professionals may not always refer to legislation directly - agencies that employ health and care workers, such as the NHS and Social Services Departments, will usually have produced documents that detail policy and procedure, designed to help them act in accordance with the law. Regulations, guidance and procedures along with various codes of practice produced by the relevant professional bodies: the Nursing & Midwifery Council (NMC) for Nurses and Midwifes and the British Association of Social Workers (BASW) for Social Workers) recommend what is considered to be good practice on a day-to-day basis for professionals. In other words what is considered to be the professional's 'duty of care', in given work-related situations. This means in effect that the professional has a defence against claims of malpractice or negligence if s/he has followed the authorised guidance and regulations. However the converse also applies. If a professional has not followed accepted guidance or procedure and a client or patient has suffered harm as a result of the professional's actions, the professional may be personally found guilty of negligence. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Law of Tort section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Law of Tort essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Discuss the extent to which discrimination is prohibited under English and Welsh law (25 ...

    5 star(s)

    There is also the Sex discrimination act 1975 it covers discrimination on the grounds of sex in the areas of employment, education, housing and the provision of services. While this act didn't come into force until 1975 more recently it has been extended to cover transsexuals by the Gender Recognition

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Questions related to the tort of negligence.

    3 star(s)

    They, in turn, will probably raise their premiums, meaning that the burden of the debt is spread much more thinly and widely. Of course, this is based on the assumption that the plaintiff doesn't take both the employer and employee to court - in which case, this isn't really an advantage.

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Critically evaluate the principles governing the law on Intoxication.

    3 star(s)

    The defendant pleaded his defence that he did not know what he was doing and therefore he did not have the required mens rea. The jury were directed that self induced intoxication as a defence was not available to his basic intent crimes.

  2. Law- Negligence

    More recently, the courts have additionally to the requirement of reliance, emphasised the notion of assumption of responsibility by the defendant. In Henderson v Merrett Syndicates Ltd [1994], the House of Lords held that the doctrine of assumption of responsibility could apply to anyone rendering a professional service.

  1. Gross negligence and recklessness.

    liability, we need to draw the following distinctions: Strict liability offences where the prosecution does not have to prove mens rea in regard to one or more elements of the offence.

  2. UNIT3 ASSIGNMENT4 LAW OF TORT

    for the Ken to prevent the interference or avoid it, as Ken was aware that toxiclear lorries had been present on his land. And if it could be shown that a Ken was operating a plant which constitutes as a nuisance, and with the expenditure of a reasonable sum avoid

  1. In this report, the differences between contractual liability and tortuous liability are explained. In ...

    Chemicals from Chemi-Kaze?s containers killed many of Flower Power?s stock of plants. Analysis: By statue (Occupier?s liability Act 1957 and 1984), a premises occupier takes responsibility for ensuring the Premises reasonably safe for all those who attend on it (Ward vs.

  2. Tort law assignment. Brian fell against the standard of care a reasonable man would ...

    would rely on that skill. The claimant receiving the advice must have acted in reliance on it as longs as it was reasonable to rely on the advice. To establish whether there was a special relationship between Brian and John the meaning of a special relationship must be looked at.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work