• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Business Law - contract law

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

BA 333 Gil Erez 0523-000576 Business Law November 23, 2003 Table of Contents: 1) Essentials of a contract ....... Page 2 2) Case ............................ Page 5 1) What are the essentials of a valid contract A contract, by definition, is an agreement by two or more parties, which is intended to be legally binding and supported by consideration. All contracts must have these three elements present for it to qualify as a proper contract in the eyes of the law: offer and acceptance, consideration, and intent to create legal relations. First, we will examine the first part of what constitutes a contract, the offer and acceptance. An offer is a statement said from the offeror to the offeree stating that he would like to formulate a contract between the two parties. The offer must include something specific, and which has value, either monetary or otherwise between the parties. An offer must also state the time period for its validity. If one were not stated, it would be up to the courts to decide what would be the proper length of validity of the offer. Once the validity period of the offer has lapsed, an acceptance of the offer cannot be made, unless the offeror agrees to repeat the offer. ...read more.

Middle

The company then deposited 1,000 � in a bank to show their seriousness. Carlill used the product and was not cured, then sued the company. The company's argument was that the advertisement was just for promotions, and they did not intend to create legal relations. The courts upheld that because of the deposit in the bank, the company showed sufficient intent to create legal relations. Only a fool would argue that when he goes into a shop to buy an item, he didn't really mean to. With these two brought to light, we can clearly see what constitutes intent within a contract. It is one of the vital elements of a contract, and without it a contract cannot exist. "The cause which moves a contracting party to enter into an agreement; the material cause of a contract; the price of a stipulation; compensation; equivalent" --Bouvier. Finally, we will discuss the last essential of a valid contract, consideration. Consideration is defined as something promised, given, or done that has the effect of making the agreement a legally enforceable contract. For consideration to be valid, it must have four elements present. First, consideration should not be past. One cannot give consideration for an act that has already been done, or a deal that has already been transacted. ...read more.

Conclusion

In the practice of law one can never argue facts on the assumption that they happened. The fisherman, for some strange reason, might have declined the 1,000$. The presence of acceptance is not clear; this would have to be subject to further investigation. The presence of intent to create legal relations is clearly visible, with the offer of 1,000$ stated. This is one element of the contract that is not shrouded in mystery, so therefore we may now continue onto the last element of a contract. Consideration must not be past, must be sufficient, must move from the promisee and must not be illegal. The evidence here is clear, the consideration was past and therefore not valid. Having saved his life earlier without George making an express agreement to pay him 1,000$, the fisherman is legally entitled to nothing from George. It is out of the kindness of George's heart, and maybe gratification, that he is paying the fisherman 1,000$. Therefore we can properly advice the fisherman not to pursue legal action if George refuses to pay. By helping George in his time of need, the fisherman would have been protected from any liability of death due to the Good Samaritan Act (Chapter 32-03.1). The fisherman therefore is in a good situation as it is. If George doesn't want to pay the 1,000$ which he promised that would be on his conscience not the fisherman's. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Law of Contract section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Law of Contract essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    "The requirement of consideration is an unnecessary complication in the formation of contracts."

    4 star(s)

    As long as the consideration has some economic value to it, it can be regarded as good consideration. This principle is further illustrated in the case of Chappell v Nestle [1960] where Lord Somervell stated that the courts are unwilling to challenge the adequentcy of consideration due to the fact that contracting parties should have the freedom to trade.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Contract Law - Offer And Acceptance

    3 star(s)

    than the reserve, but the auction hold no liable if he by mistake accepts the lower price as the is no contract between he and the owner - without reserved12 : no contract between the highest bidder and the owner if the auctioneer refuses to accept highest bid but the

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Billy Joel Business Ethics and Law Case Study. In the above case ...

    3 star(s)

    Case Solution In the above case scenario, the oral contract that was made between the seller and the buyer are not binding in the court of law in accordance to the contract law.

  2. Four ways in which a contract may be discharged.

    Otherwise the remedy is damages. REPUDIATION. A breach of condition or a serious breach of an innominate term allows the innocent party to repudiate. The innocent party has a choice. They may elect to affirm the contract. If the innocent party repudiates: > they are no longer bound to accept

  1. Contract Law

    Further, unless the parties agree to the contrary, there is no obligation of the offeree to order goods only through the offeror, ie the offeree may choose not to accept the standing offer (Great Northern Railway Co v. Witham). Options If the offeree provides consideration (eg paying money)

  2. Advising a Client : Contract Law

    This general rule would mean that A could demand the return of the �5000 he paid in advance. Like all general rules though, the Act provides exceptions, where advance money cannot always be claimed back in part or in whole.

  1. What is the importance of implied terms to the contract of employment

    See Hivac Ltd v Park Royal Scientific Instruments Ltd [1946] Ch. 169 20 [1987] Ch. 117 21 http://www.kfc.com/about/secret.htm 22 These are called restrained of trade clauses. 23 Marshall v Industrial Systems & Control [1992] I.R.L.R. 294 24 [1972] 2 Q.B.

  2. Outline the basic rule of the law of contract regarding the effective revocation of ...

    Under Byrne & Co v Leon Van Tienhoven & Co Jane would be in a vulnerable position since it was held that withdrawal of an offer must be communicated to the offeree to be effective, in this case it was done by telephone after the acceptance had taken place.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work