• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Case About Consideration

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Case About Consideration This is a question involving technicalities in contract law, consideration, human rights and property law. It is axiomatic to recognize the fact that Peter has a legal obligation not to follow Mary deliberately (and she would almost be sure of invoking such a defence), but her request for him not to stay in the same city could be viewed as way above that obligation and thus if Peter does go to the extent of moving away from the city, he could very well have given to her a practical benefit sufficient enough to effect consideration. This however, would only be recognized by the courts as consideration if his acts fulfill the requirement of economic value. ...read more.

Middle

Similar case quoted is Thomas v. Thomas (1842). For the relevance of property law in the arbitrary exclusion rule, read on the case of CIN Properties Ltd v. Rawlins, where a group of youths accused of misbehavior were prevented from entering upon a large part of their home centre via a court order for injunction. If an agreement is illegal, neither party can sue the other for breach of contract nor recover for any performance rendered. If the parties are found in equal fault, the court will leave them where it found them, providing a remedy to neither. As Lord Mansfield wrote in a 1775 decision, "No Court will lend its aid to a man who founds his cause of action upon an immoral or an illegal act." ...read more.

Conclusion

Conclusion The case described certainly does not radically change the common law position in relation to illegal contract. It remains the case that the courts will not enforce a contract if it was entered into for an illegal purpose, was prohibited by statute or was subsequently performed in an illegal way. As it is an illegal contract from the very beginning that the entire agreement is void and unenforceable. It is not reasonable from Peter to sue Mary for it. Reference Materials: Goldman, Arnold J. (1996). Business law, principles and practices / Arnold J. Goldman, William D. Sigismond. 4th ed., Boston : Houghton Mifflin Co Beatty, Jeffrey F. (2001). Business Law for a New Century / Jeffrey F. Beatty, Susan S. Samuelson, 2nd ed., Autralis; Cincinnati, Ohio : West Legal Studies in Business / Thomson Learning. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Law of Contract section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Law of Contract essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    "The requirement of consideration is an unnecessary complication in the formation of contracts."

    4 star(s)

    The act of forbearance, especially when giving up the right to pursuing a bona fide cause of action given in exchange for the promise provided by the promisor is good consideration. Often the consideration is provided by the promise should be at the request of promisor.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Contract Law - Offer And Acceptance

    3 star(s)

    MRC sent a draft agreement to B who filled in the name of an arbitrator, signed it and returned it to MRC's agent who put it in his desk. Coal was ordered and supplied in accordance with the agreement but after a dispute arose B said there was no binding agreement.

  1. Four ways in which a contract may be discharged.

    A very experienced ship valuer had said that he knew of only one other comparable ship but that may now have been sold. The plaintiff wants the ship for immediate use and I do not think damages would be an adequate compensation."

  2. I have been asked to advise a client on considering contracting with a building ...

    A year after this, he repudiated the agreement." (Taken from Common Law1 BPP) The outcome of the case was that the repudiation was too late and was ineffective. The diagram below shows the effect of having a contract regarding the capacity.

  1. In advising Bennys position of the interest over the said property (the flat), it ...

    to his detriment in reliance upon that he will enjoy some right or benefit over the property. In facts, if Benny wishes to establish a proprietary estoppel in his favour, the following must be proved :- (a) there must have been a representation or promise, (b)

  2. Undue influence in the case of Barclays Bank v. O''Brian [1994] Lord Browne-Wilkinson was ...

    Ildar doesn't seem to have taken legal advice, which might be even justified given the short time during which the dispute occurred and there is nothing to suggest when Ildar wants to sue for his money, but the sooner he takes action the more likely he is to win.

  1. Legal Studies Assess Two

    That's all I have to say'. Even though the amount of evidence against him convinced the jury that he was guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, if it ever did come to light that he was not guilty, this would not have been a just outcome for him.

  2. LAW OF CONTRACT. LAW 103. THE CONTENT OF THE CONTRACT.

    The purchaser ignored this advice and bought the boat. When it proved to be unseaworthy, he sued. 3. THE RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF CONTRACTUAL TERMS. This material in this section is designed for self-study. When you have answered a question yourself turn to the suggested answer.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work