• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Case for a Bill of Rights

Extracts from this document...


Case for A Bill of Rights Currently within British politics there is controversy over the Issue of whether or not the UK Government should introduce a Bill of Rights. There are members or both the Tory and Labour parities that are for and against the Introduction of this document, David Cameron in particular is In favour of the introduction, claiming that 'current legislation is inadequate and hinders the fight against crime and terrorism.' (BBC NEWS) It is said that he believes the current Human Rights Act, which was established in 2000 has strong weaknesses which need to be addressed. However, others believe that those in favour of the Bill or Rights and against the Human Rights Act are simply so due to the fact that the Human Rights Act 'seem inconvenient' according to the Lord Chancellor. The most important reason why the Bill or Rights should be introduced is because with an entrenched document within the law with exact rules and regulations, the Government would not at any one point take away the civil liberties of UK Citizens. ...read more.


Recently, there have been cases in which criminals, such as terrorists and murderers, have claimed that the Human Rights Act protects them again deportation. In one case, a criminal claimed that his family that he was close to lived in England, and he would be psychologically affected had he been forced to move back to Italy to stay with his other family. The fourth and final reason of importance as to why the Bill of Rights should be introduced is that 'the rule of law' demands a clear statement of citizens rights and duties, which Britain is yet to gain. The population of England, Scotland and Wales do not have anywhere they can go to find their rights if they wish to, as the Americans can. There are no rules or rights given to UK Citizens that are set in stone, which is crucial for a population to have full faith In their Government. The most important reason why the Bill of Rights should not be introduced is because the law within Britain is contradictive of itself and in many cases loopholes are found in the Governments favour, if a Bill of Rights was written, it would be entrenched, concise and precise. ...read more.


The UK is known across the world for being a state where freedom is a priority. However, if a Bill of Rights was ensued, these freedoms would be largely restrained as the rights of the population were regulated and defined. Overall, the argument for a Bill of Rights is far stronger than that against, however the case against a Bill of Rights also has a number of highly valid points which are to be considered. For example, the fact that the rights to be entrenched would be decided by someone currently unknown to the public. Would the Government decide as a whole which rights to embed within the legal system? There would be major disagreements within Government if this were to be the case as the final outcome of these decisions would affect the UK for the rest of the country's existence. The Bill of Rights does seem to be, however, currently a resolution to many problems being faced by the Government and the state. If the safety of the people really is coming to be less important than the rights of an individual as written in the Human Rights Act, the UK are well on their way to self-destruction. Lucy Dark 6L0 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sources of Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sources of Law essays

  1. How has the European Court of Human Rights contributed to the protection of children's ...

    Greece120 where a girl's religious convictions were not considered, thereby disabling her to succeed claiming state infringement of her right by compulsory nature of military parade, for non-attendance of which she was punished. It may be arguable whether this is consistent with Art.

  2. The rights of cohabitees- time for a change?

    The answer is not legal, but political17, and not the focus of this essay. Nonetheless the need for such legislation is compounded by the recent increase in cohabitation. Cohabiting couples accounted for 8.4% of all family units in 2002 compared with 3.9 % in 199618.

  1. Human Rights

    prostitution industry in Indonesia, and the useless nature of the unratified protocol. Therefore, it is clearly evidenced that international legal measure of the protocol is ineffectual in addressing the human rights issue of child prostitution unless the protocol is ratified into domestic law.

  2. Law case study

    properly the circumstances and social factors having a bearing upon all service users, irrespective of sex, ethnicity, religion or disability". The Children (Scotland) Act 1995 was a major piece of legislation underpinning many areas of the law concerning children. The Children (Scotland)

  1. Extradition of terrorists

    The list of conduct contains terrorism as an offence; however there is no mention of the conduct of a 'suspected' terrorist. However the Extradition Act 2003 has a policy that simplifies and removes evidential requirements where possible so the requesting country may not have to provide much evidence that the person may have committed terrorism.


    they were equal to. However, few coins were issued, as the British authorities were unwilling to allow the colonies to mint their own coins. Various different bank tokens were issued in denominations of 1/2 and 1 penny. In the French speaking parts of Canada (Lower Canada, formerly New France, later


    The most important reason for this is that there is yet much controversy as to the definition of culture itself. This was first discussed in a meeting on cultural rights as human rights held by UNESCO Headquarters.6 Culture has been referred to in both a wide anthropological sense and a restrictive sense; and so difficult to find one universal definition.

  2. Should people have a right to privacy?

    However, the scandal really blew up when it was revealed that the police had a possible 4000 targets of a variety of people who had been hacked by News of the World including sport stars, celebrities, victims of crime and politicians.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work