• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Case study law

Extracts from this document...


Q Basil, aged 21, has been found guilty of robbery in Granchester Crown Court. He threatened a passer-by and demanded that he give him his bicycle. Basil said he only wanted to borrow it to get home. He wishes to appeal. To which court does the appeal lie from the crown court and on what ground can an appeal be brought? Consider the present appeal system in criminal cases and assess whether it sufficiently protects the defendant from miscarriages of justice. (25 Marks) The Court of Appeal hears appeals from the Crown Court against conviction and sentence. Appeals against sentence may only be made with leave. Appeals against conviction on matters of law may be made as of right, but leave of the court is needed for other reasons e.g. in the question on a question of fact or on a mixed question of law and fact, leave of the Court of Appeal is required unless the trial judge certify that the case is fit for appeal. About three-quarters of appeals are against sentence only. The Court of Appeal may hear evidence that was not available at the original trial but it does not happen frequently and the court mainly relies on transcripts and legal arguments. ...read more.


appeal against the judge's ruling on a point of law at a preparatory hearing before the jury is empanelled. Under the Criminal Justice Act 2003 the prosecution can also appeal against a "terminating ruling" made by the judge during the course of the trial, or against any other ruling (such as the exclusion of important evidence) that significantly weakens the prosecution's case, before the case is finally entrusted to the jury. Such an appeal must be lodged almost immediately, and the trial is adjourned while the Court of Appeal considers the matter. The prosecution cannot formally appeal against the sentence, but the Attorney-General can refer an "excessively lenient" sentence to the Court of Appeal. The Court studies the transcript and hears legal argument; it may then increase (or reduce) the sentence. The Attorney-General can also refer a point of law to the Court of Appeal: the Court hears legal argument and rules on the point of law. This sets a precedent for future cases, but does not affect the instant case. Either side can then appeal (with leave) to the House of Lords on a point of law of general public importance. ...read more.


This was not particularly successful, because the Home Secretary as a politician didn't want to be seen as soft on crime, and the Court of Appeal were still reluctant to overturn a jury's verdict unless there was powerful new evidence. In April 1997, a Criminal Cases Review Commission took over the Home Secretary's responsibility for investigating alleged miscarriages of justice and referring them back to the Court of Appeal where it thinks it appropriate. (It may also refer a conviction in the magistrates' court to the Crown Court, as if it were an appeal there.) The Commission has a staff of about 60 - three times as many as dealt with appeals in the Home Office under the old system - but detailed investigative work is still done by the police. The Birmingham Six case is a clear example of a miscarriage of justice, but it is not easy to see how the judicial process could have prevented its occurring. It emerged fifteen years after the conviction that the scientific evidence of recent contact with nitroglycerine might have come from traces of ordinary soap, and (more significantly) that police officers had deliberately lied on oath and/or falsified interview records, these having been "absolutely critical" evidence at the trial. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Machinery of Justice section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Machinery of Justice essays

  1. What justification was there for Socrates' trial, verdict and death sentence?

    He infuriated the jury so intensely, by saying he would refuse to stop prophesying, and owed a greater obedience to his god than to them. Therefore, Socrates I believe had the right to be brought to trial in this light, and even if it was because of prejudice against him,

  2. A critical evaluation of labelling theory.

    Secondary deviance however results from the attitudes of those around the offender to his or her actions. If they label the offender a deviant and stereotype them then this often serves to make the offender accept themselves as a deviant and go on to form a new life around this label.

  1. Explain the ranges of sentences available to the judge or magistrate.

    The term used in the Criminal Justice Act 1991 to decide proportionality is that the 'sentence should be commensurate with the seriousness of the offence'. 'Just desserts' reflects the aim of the Act than an offender is punished properly for his offence.

  2. Microsoft Antitrust Case Microsoft is a large diversified computer software manufacturer. Microsoft produces ...

    Second, Microsoft argued that it was just competing against Netscape, that such competition was welfare enhancing, and that it did not commit and anti-competitive acts. Third, Microsoft argued that it did not have monopoly power in the operating system market.

  1. Penal Studies for Professional Practice

    The majority of women in prison are non-violent offenders, serving short sentences mostly for property and drug offences. Whilst the numbers of women in prison are growing women still constitute a very small proportion of the total prison population, therefore they rarely attract public attention and hence are easily overlooked.

  2. Judical Creativity in Law

    They have the flexibility to refuse to follow an earlier case "when it appears right to do so", thus extending the power of the Law Lords (at least in theory) to create law. Though it is not used often it can have a major effect throughout the legal system e.g.

  1. Expert Testimony and Its Value In the Justice System

    This will help to prevent situations where sound techniques are applied incorrectly to the actual case. This would also help to avoid any incorrect decisions being made in the courts based upon totally unreliable and incorrect evidence. Another problem with the use of expert witnesses is the ?Prosecutors Fallacy?.

  2. Explain the role of the CCRC (Criminal Cases Review Commission)

    The commission is more commonly known as the Runciman Commission. It was established under the Criminal Appeal Act 1995. The CCRC are an independent body and does not represent the police. The CCRC is NOT a Court of Appeal but it is a means of bringing possible miscarriages of justice

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work