• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Case study law

Extracts from this document...


Q Basil, aged 21, has been found guilty of robbery in Granchester Crown Court. He threatened a passer-by and demanded that he give him his bicycle. Basil said he only wanted to borrow it to get home. He wishes to appeal. To which court does the appeal lie from the crown court and on what ground can an appeal be brought? Consider the present appeal system in criminal cases and assess whether it sufficiently protects the defendant from miscarriages of justice. (25 Marks) The Court of Appeal hears appeals from the Crown Court against conviction and sentence. Appeals against sentence may only be made with leave. Appeals against conviction on matters of law may be made as of right, but leave of the court is needed for other reasons e.g. in the question on a question of fact or on a mixed question of law and fact, leave of the Court of Appeal is required unless the trial judge certify that the case is fit for appeal. About three-quarters of appeals are against sentence only. The Court of Appeal may hear evidence that was not available at the original trial but it does not happen frequently and the court mainly relies on transcripts and legal arguments. ...read more.


appeal against the judge's ruling on a point of law at a preparatory hearing before the jury is empanelled. Under the Criminal Justice Act 2003 the prosecution can also appeal against a "terminating ruling" made by the judge during the course of the trial, or against any other ruling (such as the exclusion of important evidence) that significantly weakens the prosecution's case, before the case is finally entrusted to the jury. Such an appeal must be lodged almost immediately, and the trial is adjourned while the Court of Appeal considers the matter. The prosecution cannot formally appeal against the sentence, but the Attorney-General can refer an "excessively lenient" sentence to the Court of Appeal. The Court studies the transcript and hears legal argument; it may then increase (or reduce) the sentence. The Attorney-General can also refer a point of law to the Court of Appeal: the Court hears legal argument and rules on the point of law. This sets a precedent for future cases, but does not affect the instant case. Either side can then appeal (with leave) to the House of Lords on a point of law of general public importance. ...read more.


This was not particularly successful, because the Home Secretary as a politician didn't want to be seen as soft on crime, and the Court of Appeal were still reluctant to overturn a jury's verdict unless there was powerful new evidence. In April 1997, a Criminal Cases Review Commission took over the Home Secretary's responsibility for investigating alleged miscarriages of justice and referring them back to the Court of Appeal where it thinks it appropriate. (It may also refer a conviction in the magistrates' court to the Crown Court, as if it were an appeal there.) The Commission has a staff of about 60 - three times as many as dealt with appeals in the Home Office under the old system - but detailed investigative work is still done by the police. The Birmingham Six case is a clear example of a miscarriage of justice, but it is not easy to see how the judicial process could have prevented its occurring. It emerged fifteen years after the conviction that the scientific evidence of recent contact with nitroglycerine might have come from traces of ordinary soap, and (more significantly) that police officers had deliberately lied on oath and/or falsified interview records, these having been "absolutely critical" evidence at the trial. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Machinery of Justice section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Machinery of Justice essays

  1. A critical evaluation of labelling theory.

    When in prison the new offender is forced to associate with 'hardened' criminals, which can be a bad influence, also when the individual is released from prison they will have lost their previous job and will probably find it very difficult to find another as few employers wish to take on 'ex-cons' (another negative label).

  2. What justification was there for Socrates' trial, verdict and death sentence?

    He could have proclaimed 'freedom of speech,' proposed banishment, or a fine. Socrates also had a family, which would be without a father, and would lack provisions. But, it was said that Socrates hardly provided for his family, and left them poor, because of his need to prophesise.

  1. Judical Creativity in Law

    The mischief rule gives a judge much more discretion than the golden rule. When using this rule the judge should look to see what the law was before the act was passed in order to discover what gap or "mischief" the act was intended to cover.

  2. Microsoft Antitrust Case Microsoft is a large diversified computer software manufacturer. Microsoft produces ...

    The U.S. antitrust law implies that monopolization under � 2 of the Sherman at is illegal if the offender took anti-competitive action to acquire, preserve, or enhance its monopoly. To prove monopolization you need to prove the following: 1. Possession of market power; and 2.

  1. Penal Studies for Professional Practice

    The majority of women in prison are non-violent offenders, serving short sentences mostly for property and drug offences. Whilst the numbers of women in prison are growing women still constitute a very small proportion of the total prison population, therefore they rarely attract public attention and hence are easily overlooked.

  2. The Canadian Justice system towards aboriginal offenders

    Numerous considerations must be taken into account by the court when considering whether a sentencing circle would be appropriate in the particular circumstance. The simple fact that a sentencing circle is requested by council does not automatically render the accused an appropriate candidate for the process.

  1. English legal system

    trial judge had made an error even though, prima facie, it had been a model exercise of judicial discretion. To end finally, they placed two options before the court if the judge was to find his ruling in their favour: their preferred choice would be for a possession to be made.

  2. Expert Testimony and Its Value In the Justice System

    The final direction that the court can give is that the expert witnesses be cross-examined and re-examined by putting each question to them in turn. This allows for the experts to comment upon each other and explain why they may disagree.[24] These rules allow for the testimony of two separate

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work