• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Case study law

Extracts from this document...


Q Basil, aged 21, has been found guilty of robbery in Granchester Crown Court. He threatened a passer-by and demanded that he give him his bicycle. Basil said he only wanted to borrow it to get home. He wishes to appeal. To which court does the appeal lie from the crown court and on what ground can an appeal be brought? Consider the present appeal system in criminal cases and assess whether it sufficiently protects the defendant from miscarriages of justice. (25 Marks) The Court of Appeal hears appeals from the Crown Court against conviction and sentence. Appeals against sentence may only be made with leave. Appeals against conviction on matters of law may be made as of right, but leave of the court is needed for other reasons e.g. in the question on a question of fact or on a mixed question of law and fact, leave of the Court of Appeal is required unless the trial judge certify that the case is fit for appeal. About three-quarters of appeals are against sentence only. The Court of Appeal may hear evidence that was not available at the original trial but it does not happen frequently and the court mainly relies on transcripts and legal arguments. ...read more.


appeal against the judge's ruling on a point of law at a preparatory hearing before the jury is empanelled. Under the Criminal Justice Act 2003 the prosecution can also appeal against a "terminating ruling" made by the judge during the course of the trial, or against any other ruling (such as the exclusion of important evidence) that significantly weakens the prosecution's case, before the case is finally entrusted to the jury. Such an appeal must be lodged almost immediately, and the trial is adjourned while the Court of Appeal considers the matter. The prosecution cannot formally appeal against the sentence, but the Attorney-General can refer an "excessively lenient" sentence to the Court of Appeal. The Court studies the transcript and hears legal argument; it may then increase (or reduce) the sentence. The Attorney-General can also refer a point of law to the Court of Appeal: the Court hears legal argument and rules on the point of law. This sets a precedent for future cases, but does not affect the instant case. Either side can then appeal (with leave) to the House of Lords on a point of law of general public importance. ...read more.


This was not particularly successful, because the Home Secretary as a politician didn't want to be seen as soft on crime, and the Court of Appeal were still reluctant to overturn a jury's verdict unless there was powerful new evidence. In April 1997, a Criminal Cases Review Commission took over the Home Secretary's responsibility for investigating alleged miscarriages of justice and referring them back to the Court of Appeal where it thinks it appropriate. (It may also refer a conviction in the magistrates' court to the Crown Court, as if it were an appeal there.) The Commission has a staff of about 60 - three times as many as dealt with appeals in the Home Office under the old system - but detailed investigative work is still done by the police. The Birmingham Six case is a clear example of a miscarriage of justice, but it is not easy to see how the judicial process could have prevented its occurring. It emerged fifteen years after the conviction that the scientific evidence of recent contact with nitroglycerine might have come from traces of ordinary soap, and (more significantly) that police officers had deliberately lied on oath and/or falsified interview records, these having been "absolutely critical" evidence at the trial. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Machinery of Justice section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Machinery of Justice essays

  1. A critical evaluation of labelling theory.

    Lemert went on to identify two distinct forms of deviant behaviour, primary and secondary deviance. The first arises from various social and psychological factors, however the individual in question often sees the behaviour as temporary and transient, and does not see himself or herself as an offender.

  2. What justification was there for Socrates' trial, verdict and death sentence?

    It is suspicious that these feelings were suddenly brought against him, when the feelings of abhorrence towards him were already implanted several years before. This makes me believe there was a hidden agenda in the minds of the jury, and the three accusers.

  1. Explain the ranges of sentences available to the judge or magistrate.

    It is wrong to say that nothing works, what is more accurate is to state, as did Robert Martinson that "with few and isolated exceptions, the rehabilitative efforts have been reported so far have had no appreciable effect on recidivism."

  2. The Canadian Justice system towards aboriginal offenders

    nature that the non- aboriginal community will inevitable bring to the process. In light of the cultural irrelevancy of the sentencing circle in the non- aboriginal context, it is recommended that this process by confined to aboriginal offenders. The above analysis on the utility of sentencing circles in the aboriginal

  1. English legal system

    If not, in accordance with article 8 of the Human Rights Act10, the respondents should then plea all matters before the court again in order to establish what should be done. Respondents' argument The respondents maintained that the original judge had made no error in his approach and that the

  2. Penal Studies for Professional Practice

    the current climate and a system designed with, and for, male offenders. Therefore actions need to be taken to redesign resettlement provisions so that better and more effective assistance is made available for women offenders. It is acknowledged that the female prison population is currently rising at a hugely disproportionate rate.

  1. Expert Testimony and Its Value In the Justice System

    The first of these is ?Exclusionary discretion without guidance?. This would see expert testimony being treated in the same way as any other evidence. As a result evidence could possibly be refused if its value is overwhelmed by the fact it could possibly ?mislead, distract or confuse the jury?.[17] The

  2. Explain the role of the CCRC (Criminal Cases Review Commission)

    This story started off the development of the CCRC. When the Court of Appeal quashed the convictions of the 'Birmingham six' the Home Secretary then decided to set up a RCCJ (Royal Commission on Criminal Justice) to into the miscarriage of justice from when the police arrested the suspects to the final appeal.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work