• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Common Law, 1st yr problem based assignment

Extracts from this document...


Q: Advise Jacky if he could sue Samantha for breach of contract. Will you answer be different if Jacky had given Samantha HK$5,000 on 2 October 2009? In order to determine whether Jacky could sue Samantha for breach of contract, we have to examine whether there is a valid contract between them. According to Oxford Dictionary of Law1, a contract is a legally binding agreement arises as a result of an offer and a corresponding acceptance. However, consideration (unless the contract is by deed), the intention to create legal relations and the contract is legal have to co-exist for the contract to be legally binding. There are two major concerns in this question: firstly, whether there is a contract formed on 2nd October; secondly, whether there is a contract formed on 5th October. Hereinafter, I will examine the case with the criteria mentioned and analyse the likelihood of having a valid contract between the parties. Firstly, the offer and the acceptance is too vague to be legally binding. Samantha's advertisement is quite vague as it is not specific enough to be qualified as an offer. ...read more.


Jacky may argue that his consideration came later on 5th October. However, consideration has to be co-extensive with the promise for which it supported, not subsequent11. Consequently, the promise between Jacky and Samantha thereby is highly unlikely to be enforced by law; Samantha has no legal obligation in performing her promise on 5th October. Is there a contract formed on 5th October? The answer is very unlikely, due to the absence of meetings of minds. As Samantha had implicitly "rejected his offer" through her relative, Jacky knew that she was no longer minded to sell the car to him (since he got upset on hearing this). This raises the question of whether Samantha's message from her relative is regarded as authoritative as Samantha saying to Jacky personally. The decision made in the Court of Appeal in Dickinson v Dodds12 recognised that an authoritative agent of one party can communicate on behalf of that party to another. Dickinson, the potential buyer was informed by a Mr. Berry, the seller's agent that the seller (Dodds) had been offering or agreeing to sell the property to one Allen. ...read more.


The money is a benefit to Samantha and a detriment to Jacky. Conversely, the product is a benefit to Jacky and a detriment to Samantha. A legally binding contract is formed because the situation now consists of offer and acceptance, consideration and an intention to create legal relations. 1 Elizabeth A. Martin and E. Susan Singleton (eds), Dictionary of Law (4th edn OUP, Oxford 1997) 105 2 Partridge v Crittenden [1968] 1 WLR 1204 3 Gibson v Manchester City Council [1979] 1 W.L.R. 294 4 Roger Brownsword, "Offer and Acceptance" in Smith and Thomas: A Casebook on Contract (12th edn Sweet & Maxwell, London 2009) 61 5 Roger Brownsword, "Intention to Create Legal Relations" in Smith and Thomas: A Casebook on Contract (12th edn Sweet & Maxwell, London 2009) 201 6 Edwards v Skyways Ltd [1964] 1 W.L.R. 349 7 P. S. Atiyah, "Consideration" in Smith and Thomas: A Casebook on Contract (12th edn Sweet & Maxwell, London 2009) 212 8 Misa v Currie (1874-75) L.R. 10 Ex. 153 9 Thomas v Thomas (1842) 2 Q.B. 851 10 Chappell & Co Ltd v Nestl´┐Ż Co Ltd [1960] A.C. 87 11 Roscorla v Thomas [1842] Q.B. 234 12 Dickinson v Dodds [1876] 2 Ch D 463 13 Sale of Goods Act 1979 (c. 54) s2 (1) 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Law of Contract section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Law of Contract essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Contract Law - Offer And Acceptance

    3 star(s)

    The council's appeal was dismissed by the Court of Appeal. Timetable And Passenger Tickets * Issuing advertisement stating the times at and condition under which trains would run is an offer Railway Act 1998 s.123 13 * And for the bus service there is three different views on the point of contract concluded.

  2. unit3 law of tort

    for the Ken to prevent the interference or avoid it, as Ken was aware that toxiclear lorries had been present on his land. And if it could be shown that a Ken was operating a plant which constitutes as a nuisance, and with the expenditure of a reasonable sum avoid


    Question 3. Would you classify this term as a condition or a warranty? "The ship, a wooden sailing vessel, must be seaworthy." (Think of the ways in which the ship may not be seaworthy.) Answer 3. There are a number of reasons why the ship may not be seaworthy.


    not be able to be redrafted into a clause if this is found so the employer, or business may be left completely unprotected, and in some case of employment a court will not prevent an individual from using their skills or information.

  1. Invitation To Treat

    of the decedent is distributed according to a formula fixed by law. In other words, if you don't make a Will, you don't have any say about how your property will be distributed. Such proceedings could cost a lot of money and could create legal problems that might have been avoided by making a Will.

  2. Contract Law

    treat unless the advertisement is couched in terms which indicate the retailers willingness to be bound if the specified terms are accepted ie there is a promise (Carlill) rather than a mere invitation (Partridge v Crittenden [1968]). c) Advertisements appearing on the internet Application of the same principle as newspapers and magazines.

  1. The legal meaning of 'consideration'.

    However, there are certain exceptions to this rule. If one person owes a sum of money to another and agrees to pay part of this in full settlement, the rule at common law is that part-payment of a debt is not good consideration for a promise to forgo the balance4.

  2. Four ways in which a contract may be discharged.

    Time is of the essence where: > The parties so stipulate. > The nature of the subject matter or surrounding circumstances requires it. > A party subject to unreasonable delay gives notice making it so. 3. DISCHARGE BY FRUSTRATION. After the conclusion of the contract, but before performance, the circumstances so change that there is no longer a workable agreement.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work