• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Consider Dennis' liability for the deaths of Sarah and Mary.

Extracts from this document...


Consider Dennis' liability for the deaths of Sarah and Mary. In this situation, the prosecution will not be able to bring the case for murder but they can have involuntary manslaughter on Dennis for the act he played which resulted in the deaths. Involuntary manslaughter is the unlawful act of manslaughter, which is also known as constructive manslaughter or gross negligence manslaughter. In this situation, Sarah and Mary died as a consequence of Dennis' act, which was an unlawful act of criminal damage, which will result in the charge of unlawful act manslaughter. This is when the crime hasn't got its own Mens Rea but adopts it from another for example using the Mens Rea of theft and whilst in the process of theft, a person is killed, the accused will be charged with unlawful act manslaughter. ...read more.


In order to establish factual causation the prosecution must pass the but for test which is would Sarah and Mary have died but for Dennis' actions? Which the answer will be no because if Denis wasn't throwing the stones, Angela wouldn't have swerved off the road and hit Sarah and Mary wouldn't have has a heart attack either. An example of the but for test can be seen in the case of R v White (1910) where the defendant gave his mother poison but before the poison could take effect, the mother died of a heart attack and White was charged with murder because either way, his mother would have died. The jury must also take into consideration, legal causation, this can establish that the original injury was an operative and significant cause of death and an example of this can be found in R v Smith (1959) ...read more.


Therefore, Dennis will be charged with unlawful act manslaughter were his Mens Rea will come from the throwing of the stones which is criminal damage. An example of a similar case is R v Church (1965) where the accused and a women went back to his car for sex, the accused couldn't satisfy her so she slapped him and he retaliated and knocked her unconscious. Thinking she was dead, he threw her in the river where in fact, she was still alive but later died due to drowning. In this case, the judge stated that for such a verdict to inexorably to follow, the unlawful act must be such as all sober and reasonable people would recognise risk of some harm may result in from their actions and in Dennis' case, any reasonable or sober person could see the risk so he will be liable for the deaths of Sarah and Mary. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Law of Tort section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Law of Tort essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Taking selected areas of the civil and or criminal law, evaluate whether sportsmen and ...

    4 star(s)

    On the balance of probabilities a reasonable professional player would have known that the challenge would have carried significant risk of injury. Huddersfield town were held vicariously liable for the tackle. There was a similar claim in the case of Brian McCord v Swansea AFC and John Cornforth (1996) QBD.

  2. Examine the arguments for and against strict liability illustrating your answer with example of ...

    However the landlady had no knowledge of what her lodgers were doing and did not live on the premise. This conviction was quashed by the House of Lords who said that it was essential for the defendant to have knowledge of what her premises was being used for, and since

  1. The terms Actus Reus and Mens Rea

    Coincidence, once a very strict principle of the temporal coexistence of mens rea and actus reus has changed. Largely owing to causation, what we now have is a wider definition which hallows judge and jury to consider whole series of acts or one prolonged transaction.

  2. Discuss the meaning of fault on the basis for criminal liability. Explain and evaluate ...

    The company couldn't argue that they took reasonable care to prevent this, because the House of Lords said strict liability meant no defence of reasonable care. This is a beneficial for the public in respect that they can claim for the damage they have suffered.

  1. What is the meaning of intention in English criminal law? Is it always possible ...

    Currently the specific rule about drunkenness is if you are so drunk so that you do not form the intent necessary, then you are permitted to be acquitted. However, the rule in D.P.P.

  2. Discuss the criminal liability for an offence against the person of Reena in respect ...

    It is clear from these facts that Reena has committed the Actus Reus for Battery. The mens rea for battery is that the accused intended to apply unlawful force to another or was subjectively reckless as to whether such force might be applied.

  1. Involuntary Manslaughter

    However, if a reasonable person would have known that some physical harm was likely to occur, and it causes death, such as a heart attack for example, then D may be guilty. Gross negligence manslaughter AR * D had a duty of care * There was a breach of this

  2. In this report, the differences between contractual liability and tortuous liability are explained. In ...

    in respect of risks of which the occupier knows or has reasonable grounds to believe that they exist; 2. if he knows or has reasonable grounds to believe that the [trespasser] is in the vicinity of the risks; 3. If the risk is one against which he can be expected to offer some protection in the circumstances.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work