• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Consider Dennis' liability for the deaths of Sarah and Mary.

Extracts from this document...


Consider Dennis' liability for the deaths of Sarah and Mary. In this situation, the prosecution will not be able to bring the case for murder but they can have involuntary manslaughter on Dennis for the act he played which resulted in the deaths. Involuntary manslaughter is the unlawful act of manslaughter, which is also known as constructive manslaughter or gross negligence manslaughter. In this situation, Sarah and Mary died as a consequence of Dennis' act, which was an unlawful act of criminal damage, which will result in the charge of unlawful act manslaughter. This is when the crime hasn't got its own Mens Rea but adopts it from another for example using the Mens Rea of theft and whilst in the process of theft, a person is killed, the accused will be charged with unlawful act manslaughter. ...read more.


In order to establish factual causation the prosecution must pass the but for test which is would Sarah and Mary have died but for Dennis' actions? Which the answer will be no because if Denis wasn't throwing the stones, Angela wouldn't have swerved off the road and hit Sarah and Mary wouldn't have has a heart attack either. An example of the but for test can be seen in the case of R v White (1910) where the defendant gave his mother poison but before the poison could take effect, the mother died of a heart attack and White was charged with murder because either way, his mother would have died. The jury must also take into consideration, legal causation, this can establish that the original injury was an operative and significant cause of death and an example of this can be found in R v Smith (1959) ...read more.


Therefore, Dennis will be charged with unlawful act manslaughter were his Mens Rea will come from the throwing of the stones which is criminal damage. An example of a similar case is R v Church (1965) where the accused and a women went back to his car for sex, the accused couldn't satisfy her so she slapped him and he retaliated and knocked her unconscious. Thinking she was dead, he threw her in the river where in fact, she was still alive but later died due to drowning. In this case, the judge stated that for such a verdict to inexorably to follow, the unlawful act must be such as all sober and reasonable people would recognise risk of some harm may result in from their actions and in Dennis' case, any reasonable or sober person could see the risk so he will be liable for the deaths of Sarah and Mary. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Law of Tort section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Law of Tort essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Taking selected areas of the civil and or criminal law, evaluate whether sportsmen and ...

    4 star(s)

    voluntarily assumed to take the risk involved, although knowledge of the danger does not necessarily imply consent. Volenti succeeded in the case of Morris v Murray 1990 3 All ER 801 after the plaintiff accepted a lift with a drunk driver.

  2. Examine the arguments for and against strict liability illustrating your answer with example of ...

    However the landlady had no knowledge of what her lodgers were doing and did not live on the premise. This conviction was quashed by the House of Lords who said that it was essential for the defendant to have knowledge of what her premises was being used for, and since

  1. Discuss the meaning of fault on the basis for criminal liability. Explain and evaluate ...

    However, it turned out he did, as a punishment, he was given 5 years imprisonment. Was he really at fault her to deserve the same sentence as section 20 of the OAPA? In relation to mens rea, if it is hard to prove the mens rea then conviction may be impossible (e.g.

  2. Involuntary Manslaughter

    MR * D must have foreseen a risk of serious injury or death occurring. This is subjective recklessness. * D must have assessed that risk as at least highly probable to occur. Before the case of Adomako, it was held that manslaughter could be committed by recklessness on an objective test.

  1. Discussing Homicide - muder - actus reus.

    refusal to have the transfusion, assuming that it would have saved her life - and still leave the actus reus operating. Interestingly, as Professor Williams said (Textbook of Criminal Law 1983), 'The decision means that if the death penalty for murder were restored, the attacker might be hanged purely as

  2. Jenny had an argument with her boyfriend, David, which resulted in David throwing Jenny ...

    construe the requirement broadly so that in Fagan's case his driving onto a policeman's foot and subsequent failure to remove the car as instructed was considered to be a continuing act. 502 Words (b) (i) Outline the range of offences David could be charged with.

  1. I am the company solicitor for Everlasting Estates Ltd., and have been required to ...

    Charles is employed on the site and amongst his job functions he is required to carry out some welding work. Charles has suffered an eye injury whilst using protective goggles which were defective. I am the company solicitor for Everlasting Estates Ltd., and have been required to draft a

  2. In this report, the differences between contractual liability and tortuous liability are explained. In ...

    Under the law of negligence there are several special types of liability and some groups are held to a higher standard of care than the average person. For example, consumers can sue a manufacturer of a product if the product is faulty or does not meet a required standard.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work