• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

contact law

Extracts from this document...


By reference to case law authority, distinguish between offers and invitations to treat. A contract can be defined as an agreement between two or more competent parties in which an offer is made and accepted, and each party benefits. Some contracts are required to be in writing in order to be enforced. Therefore by using reference to case law authority I wish to distinguish between offers and invitations to treat. An offer is a statement of willingness from one part to enter into a contract that contains certain terms. The offer must be completed and capable of being accepted. The written terms can be used in evidence in the event of a disagreement. A contract does not always need to be written. There are some situations where an oral contract will be legally enforceable. The offer must be accepted without new terms entering the contract. If the offer is not accepted or new terms are introduced then this is a counter - offer. A counter offer can refuse the original offer. If the counter offer terms are accepted then these terms become the terms of the contract. Acceptance does not take place until communication to the person making the offer. Communication of acceptance is the moment when the contract is formed. There are two main rules leading communication of acceptance. These being the reception rule - the contract are formed when acceptance is received by the person making the offer which usually applies to instant communications such as phone calls. ...read more.


In the earlier case of Storer v Manchester city council [1979] 1 WLR 294 the plaintiff had received a reply to his formal application to purchase. The reply was a letter from the town clerk forwarding a formal agreement for sale for the tenant to sign, and stating on receipt of that agreement that town clerk would send a copy of it, signed on behalf of the council in exchanged. It contained all the essential terms for the sale of the house. It was signed by the tenant and sent to the council but they failed to sign it and return their copy In exchange. It was held that there was a binding contract. The clerk's letter forwarding the formal "agreement for sale" was a clear offer, containing all the essential terms and the tenant had accepted this offer by signing the agreement and sending it. Therefore an offer is a statement which objectively indicates that the offeror is prepared to contract on specified terms An offer may be revoked or terminated if a reasonable period of time has elapsed - to avoid uncertainty as to what might constitute a 'reasonable period of time' time limits should be specified on any offers made or the offer is withdrawn or revoked at any time prior to acceptance provided that such withdrawal or revocation has been communicated to the person or persons to whom the offer was originally made or the person to whom the offer was made rejects the offer. ...read more.


The Court of Appeal rejected this argument. The defendant's advert did amount to an offer to the whole world but it only matured into a contract when someone performed the condition required in the offer. Consequently, although the offer was made to the whole world, the contact is made with that limited section of the public who come forward and perform the condition requested. The plaintiff who had performed the condition by accepting the offer and providing the necessary consideration could enforce the unilateral contract constituted by the advert and won her case and the �100 claimed. The principle from carllil also applies to advertisements offering rewards. There are traditionally treat as offers rather than invitations to treat. Since there is an intention for the offeror to be bound as soon as the information is given. The distinction between an offer and invitation to treat is often hard to draw as it depends on the elusive criteria of intention. But there are certain stereotyped situations that the distinction is determined by rules of law. An offer is made when a person shoes a willingness to enter into a legally binding contract. An invitation to treat is a supply of information to tempt a person into making an offer. However the distinction between the two can be misleading and misinterpreted. When misinterpretations and complications happen then it is down to the courts to decide and to distinguish between the two terms so a person is not led into a binding contract of which he does not want to be apart of. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Law of Contract section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Law of Contract essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    "The requirement of consideration is an unnecessary complication in the formation of contracts."

    4 star(s)

    where it was held that the respective promisee had actually done more than they were actually legally compelled to do and so were entitled to more than was previously stipulated. It could be said that there had been a variation in the original contract and fresh promises were being supported by fresh consideration.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Contract Law - Offer And Acceptance

    3 star(s)

    The owner,Mr Henderson bid 61 guineas. The plaintiff was informed the last bidder was the owner and declined to bid further. The defendant knocked the mare down to Mr.Henderson and enter his his name on the sale book as purchaser.

  1. unit3 law of tort

    The test is objective (i.e. what a reasonable person would consider a nuisance rather than what the claimant himself considered a nuisance), and the court takes many factors into consideration, including the purpose or motive of the defendant (Ken) and the following: The court will consider whether it was practicable


    It may be missing life jackets, it may have only one anchor, it may not have sufficient medical supplies, the sails may be threadbare, the boards may be so rotten that they are likely to be holed as soon as the ship encounters rough water etc.


    Relevant case Faccenda Chicken ltd v Fowler (1986) - Fowler was employed in a position of sales manager with Faccenda chicken ltd. He worked for the company for 7 years and played a prominent role in the creation and expansion of the company refrigerated poultry selling operations. The company operated a fleet of refrigerated vans which travelled around

  2. "There are occasions where terms are implied into contracts which have never been discussed ...

    Arguably the most important of the acts is the Sale of Goods Act 1979, which has six noteworthy sections on this matter. The first is S12 the implied condition as to title, it is assumed that the seller has the right to sell the goods.

  1. Invitation To Treat

    The law of contract requires that, in order for a binding contract to exist, there must be such intention, together with offer, acceptance and consideration. The existence of intention is tested by using two established presumptions. First, if the agreement is commercial in nature, there is a presumption that they intended to be legally bound.

  2. The theory of tenure requires that all land that is held for any estate ...

    continue indefinitely or may be determined by either party at any time. LEASE TODAY A lease is an estate or interest in land of defined duration. It is sometimes called a term of years or demise. A lease has both a contract and in most cases an estate.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work