• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Contract law

Extracts from this document...


BUSINESS LAW On 1 January, Kenny writes to Elaine offering to sell Elaine her car for $50,000. On 5 January, Elaine writes back and offers to pay $40,000. On 8 January, Kenny replies in writing that he will take $45,000. On12 January, Elaine writes to Kenny and asks whether the car radio is included in the price. On 15 January, Kenny writes to Elaine and tells her that the car radio is not included. On 19 January, Kenny writes to Elaine and tells her that he has decided not to sell his car. On the same day, Elaine writes to Kenny accepting the offer of 8 January. Is there a contract between the parties? Assume that all letters were posted on the day they were written and delivered following day. For a valid contract to exist there must be offer and acceptance. An offer is a statement of willingness to be bound by the terms of the offer. Kenny's letter construed as an offer to sell car for $50,000. ...read more.


Furthermore Elaine's letter on 5 January is a new offer and will require acceptance in order to form a contract. On 8 January, Kenny replies in writing that he will take $45,000. Kenny is making a fresh offer for himself. On 12 January, Elaine is making a request for information whether the car radio is included, which is not normally considered as a rejection of offer. In the case of Stevenson Jacques & Co v McLean showed that a request for information does not terminate the original offer. In addition, offer made by Kenny on 8 January is still legally binding. On 15 January, Kenny's letter to Elaine is the provision of information as he informed Elaine that the car radio is not included. Still, Kenny's offer on 8 January is valid. However, on 19 January, Kenny is revoking the offer of 8 January by deciding not to sell his car to Elaine. Revocation is an offer withdrawn or revoked by the offeror at any time before it has been accepted and only effective until communicated to the offeree. ...read more.


On the other hand, Kenny's offer was on 8 January and Elaine accepted the offer on 19 January, which is 11 days later for the acceptance of the offer. There is no deadline for the acceptance of the offer and therefore no acceptance must be within reasonable time. In the case of Ramsgate Victoria Hotel Co v Montefiore held that there was no contract as there was no acceptance of the offer within a reasonable time. If no time limit was specified for acceptance therefore 11 days is a reasonable time for Elaine to accept the offer. Elaine's acceptance will be effective and lead to a form of contract. However, if 11 days are deemed unreasonable as business transaction usually takes 5 to 7 days to proceed and therefore Elaine's acceptance is not valid and no contract is binding according to Ramsgate Victoria Hotel Co v Montefiore case. In conclusion, it is arguable for both parties whether to be bound by contract. There is a contract if the acceptance of Elaine is effective before the revocation of offer from Kenny takes place. However, Kenny can argue that no contract exists as offer can lapse through the lapse of time. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Law of Contract section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Law of Contract essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Contract Law - Offer And Acceptance

    3 star(s)

    or advertising goods for sale is to invites customers to make offer to purchase. General rule ' is an ITT no offer' FISHER V BELL 1961 Display of flick knives not contravening Restriction of Offensive Weapons Act 1959. Held to be an invitation to treat.

  2. Contract Law - offer and acceptance.

    Astonia's failure to read any telex messages could amount to them being culpable for lack of communication of the tender. The tender of �3500 submitted by Mintex would become the binding acceptance, as it would be the highest tender submitted.

  1. Offer and Acceptance

    offer if it is completely inconsistent with the first is Picksford v Celestrica (2003) where Picksford sent a fax but later sent a second fax with more definite details which was seen as a counter offer. Celestrica sent a confirmation with different terms agreeing with the first fax, this being a second counter offer.


    Routledge v McKay [1954] 1 WLR 615. The defendant, when selling his motor bike on October 23rd, told the claimant that it was a 1942 model. A written contract was produced and signed on October 30th, and this made no reference to the date.

  1. Advising a Client : Contract Law

    v Societe Franco-Americaine des Phosphates de Medulla (1923) 92 LJKB 455). In the present case the second clause of the contract is an express provision covering the event that the specifications may be misunderstood. The clause dictates that A should take all 'reasonably practicable' steps to ensure the specifications meet with T's requirements.


    In the Auctioneers catalogue it was said that the cattle were described as offered for unreserved sale. The pursuer in common with other bidders thought that this phrase meant that the owners had not placed a reserve price on the bull.

  1. Outline the basic rule of the law of contract regarding the effective revocation of ...

    While it is clear that the revocation must be acknowledge to the attention of the offeree, it is not entirely clear as to when the revocation is treated as being brought to his attention. In The Brimnes [1975] QB 929, it was held, if a revocation sent by telex during

  2. Aspects of Contract and Business Law Case Studies

    TASK 2 Explain the position of each of the parties, with regard to contract law. Identify the features that are important in deciding whether a contract has been formed and fully explain any principles that are operating in the dealings between the parties.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work