• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Contract law

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

BUSINESS LAW On 1 January, Kenny writes to Elaine offering to sell Elaine her car for $50,000. On 5 January, Elaine writes back and offers to pay $40,000. On 8 January, Kenny replies in writing that he will take $45,000. On12 January, Elaine writes to Kenny and asks whether the car radio is included in the price. On 15 January, Kenny writes to Elaine and tells her that the car radio is not included. On 19 January, Kenny writes to Elaine and tells her that he has decided not to sell his car. On the same day, Elaine writes to Kenny accepting the offer of 8 January. Is there a contract between the parties? Assume that all letters were posted on the day they were written and delivered following day. For a valid contract to exist there must be offer and acceptance. An offer is a statement of willingness to be bound by the terms of the offer. Kenny's letter construed as an offer to sell car for $50,000. ...read more.

Middle

Furthermore Elaine's letter on 5 January is a new offer and will require acceptance in order to form a contract. On 8 January, Kenny replies in writing that he will take $45,000. Kenny is making a fresh offer for himself. On 12 January, Elaine is making a request for information whether the car radio is included, which is not normally considered as a rejection of offer. In the case of Stevenson Jacques & Co v McLean showed that a request for information does not terminate the original offer. In addition, offer made by Kenny on 8 January is still legally binding. On 15 January, Kenny's letter to Elaine is the provision of information as he informed Elaine that the car radio is not included. Still, Kenny's offer on 8 January is valid. However, on 19 January, Kenny is revoking the offer of 8 January by deciding not to sell his car to Elaine. Revocation is an offer withdrawn or revoked by the offeror at any time before it has been accepted and only effective until communicated to the offeree. ...read more.

Conclusion

On the other hand, Kenny's offer was on 8 January and Elaine accepted the offer on 19 January, which is 11 days later for the acceptance of the offer. There is no deadline for the acceptance of the offer and therefore no acceptance must be within reasonable time. In the case of Ramsgate Victoria Hotel Co v Montefiore held that there was no contract as there was no acceptance of the offer within a reasonable time. If no time limit was specified for acceptance therefore 11 days is a reasonable time for Elaine to accept the offer. Elaine's acceptance will be effective and lead to a form of contract. However, if 11 days are deemed unreasonable as business transaction usually takes 5 to 7 days to proceed and therefore Elaine's acceptance is not valid and no contract is binding according to Ramsgate Victoria Hotel Co v Montefiore case. In conclusion, it is arguable for both parties whether to be bound by contract. There is a contract if the acceptance of Elaine is effective before the revocation of offer from Kenny takes place. However, Kenny can argue that no contract exists as offer can lapse through the lapse of time. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Law of Contract section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Law of Contract essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Contract Law - Offer And Acceptance

    3 star(s)

    �1,000 was deposited with the Alliance Bank, Regent Street, showing our sincerity in the matter. BOWEN LJ, "It is not like cases whish you offer to negotiation, or you issue advertisement that you have got a stock to sale, or house to let, in which case there is no offer to be bound by any contract.

  2. Four ways in which a contract may be discharged.

    The innocent party must take any reasonable steps that are available to mitigate the extent of the damage caused by the breach. Payzu v Saunders [1919] 2 KB 581. The contract was to deliver goods by instalments, payment to be made within one month of delivery.

  1. Contract Law

    Meaning of instantaneous Communication Face to face communication, telephone conversations and telex messages are all considered forms of instantaneous communication. Postal Acceptance Rule a) Statement of the rule An agreement will be formed when the offeree posts the letter, not when the offeror actually receives it (Henthorn v Fraser [1892]).

  2. I have been asked to advise a client on considering contracting with a building ...

    In Carlill V Carbolic Smoke Ball Co 1893 it was sufficient for the claimant to act on the offer with out acceptance of it first. Prescribed mode of communication The offeror may call for acceptance by specified means. But if the offeror stipulates that this is the only method of

  1. Offer and Acceptance

    Sheena decides to purchase these shoes and goes to the cash desk. Tom, the cashier, informs her that they were actually � 35. Sheena believes that she should be allowed to buy the shoes at the labelled price. It is important to distinguish a true offer from what is known as an invitation to treat.

  2. What is the importance of implied terms to the contract of employment

    The individual's bargaining power is usually limited when 'agreeing' his terms of employment hence the terms are often accepted on a 'take it or leave it' basis. Implied terms thus serve as the vehicle through which the courts and Parliament give employees additional rights and protection in the employment relationship.

  1. LAW OF CONTRACT. LAW 103. THE CONTENT OF THE CONTRACT.

    What is important is to ascertain the intention of the parties and the courts have developed two overlapping tests - the officious bystander test and the business efficacy test.

  2. Assess the problems that arise through terminating and offer

    some would say that the offer is now invalid but as long as the action has started and remains then it is ok. A final problem and the biggest problem with revoking an offer, is revoking a unilateral offer because essentially it can be open to the whole country or

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work