• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Contract Law - Acceptance.

Extracts from this document...


Acceptance Acceptance of an offer means unconditional agreement to all the terms of that offer. Acceptance will often be oral or in writing, but in some cases an offeree may accept an offer by doing something, such as delivering goods in response to an offer to buy. The Courts will only interpret conduct as indicating acceptance if it seems reasonable to infer that the offeree acted with the intention of accepting the offer. CASE: Brogden v Metropolian Rail Co (1877) Remaining silent cannot amount to acceptance, unless it is absolutely clear that acceptance was intended. CASE: Felthouse v Bindley (1862) Re Selectmove Ltd (1995) - The Court of Appeal pointed out that an acceptance by silence could be sufficient if it was the offeree who suggested that their silence would be sufficient. Thus in Felthouse, if the nephew had been the one to say that if his uncle heard nothing more he could treat the offer as accepted, there would have been a contract. Unilateral contracts are usually accepted by conduct. ...read more.


will be seen as acceptance by conduct of the offer in the last form. CASE: British Road Services v Crutchley (Arthur v) Ltd (1968) - The plaintiffs delivered some wiskey to the defendants for storage. The BRS driver handed the defendants employee a delivery note, which listed his company's 'conditions of carriage'. Crutchley's employee stamped the note 'received under our conditions' and handed it back to the driver. The Court held that stamping the delivery note in this way amounted to the counter offer, which BRS accepted by handing over the goods. The contract therefore incorporated Cruthcley's conditions, rather than those of the BRS However, a more recent case shows that the 'last shot' will not always succeed. CASE: Butler Machine Tool Ltd v Ex-Cell-O Corp (1979) Acceptance of unilateral contracts It has generally been assumed that there is no acceptance until the act has been completely performed - e.g. If John says to Steve, that he will give Steve �5 if Steve washes his car, Steve would not be entitled to the money until the job is finished, and Steve could not wash half the car and ask for �2.50. ...read more.


The Court of Appeal held that it was too late to do this. The part-performance by the son and daughter-in-law constituted an acceptance of the contract and the father (his representatives) was bound by the resulting contract unless the son and daughter-in-law ceased to make the payments, in which case the offer was no longer binding. Requests for information A request for information about an offer (such as whether delivery could be earlier than suggested) does not amount to a counter offer, so the original offer remains open. CASE: Stevenson v McLean (1880) - The defendant made an offer on a Saturday to sell iron to the plantiffs at a cash on delivery price of 40 shillings, and stated that the offer would remain available until the following Monday. The plaintiffs replied by asking if they could buy the goods on credit. They received no answer. On Monday afternoon they contacted the defendant to accept the offer, but the iron had already been sold to someone else. When the Plaintiffs sued for breach of contract, it was held that their reply to the offer had been merely a request for information, not a counter offer, so the original offer still stood and there was a binding contract. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Law of Contract section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

4 star(s)

4 Stars.

Overall, a detailed examination of the key authorities. Reference to acceptance of the offer of a unilateral contract (counter offers, auctions, tenders); certainty of agreement (Scammel v Ousten); and acceptance in the context of machines (Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking) could all be made to achieve better marks.

Marked by teacher Edward Smith 09/07/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Law of Contract essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    "The requirement of consideration is an unnecessary complication in the formation of contracts."

    4 star(s)

    This is to show that consideration should be prospective, inter alia, of the present or future and not of the past as a promise given for a deed already done in the past will not be regarded as good consideration as it lacks the element of trade and/or reciprocity.

  2. Postal Acceptance Rule

    In this case, clause 1 of an option agreement provided that " This option may be exercised by you by notice in writing addressed to me at any time on or before 20th December 1972. The plantiff posted a notice of exercise of the option addressed to the defendant on

  1. Entores ltd V. Miles Far East Corperation [1955] 2 QB 327(CA)

    In re Imperial Land Co. of Marseilles3, British and American Telegraph Co v. Colson4,do them In Household Fire Insurance Co. v. Grant5 was held that acceptance was complete when the letter of allotment was posted and it was irrelevant that it never arrived. Lord Herchell L.C in Henthorn v.

  2. Law of Contract - Question and answer.

    What Michelle may have perceived to be an offer may have, in fact, been on the part of David, a mere invitation to treat. An Invitation to Treat is an expression of intent to negotiate; it is not in itself an offer and cannot bind the parties into legal relations.

  1. Contract Law - offer and acceptance.

    for stock, the plaintiff's tender was the highest but the defendant refused to sell the stock. It was held by the court that the leaflets were not an offer to sell the stock to the highest bidder but an invitation for offers to purchase the stock.

  2. Critically evaluate what in law will amount to an offer

    He was found to be innocent, as the judge deemed it to be invitation to treat, as if 100 people accepted his 'offer' in the paper he wouldn't have enough and would be sued for breach of contract An inquiry can also be confused with an offer as in the case of Harvey V.

  1. Generally, silence of the offeree does not constitute an acceptance of the offer. ...

    It was obvious that the nephew had accepted and communicated to the auctioneer by telling him that the horse had been sold, even though he had not communicated the acceptance to his uncle.

  2. Evaluate the law of formation of contract in the context of modern methods of ...

    could reasonably have expected it to be real. This implies that the courts appear to be reluctant to extend the postal rule to modern methods of communication. The case of Mondial Shipping & Chartering BV v Astarte Shipping Ltd (1995)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work