• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Contract law - Advise Sarah - The first thing to ascertain is whether the advertisement constitutes an 'offer' or an 'invitation to treat'.

Extracts from this document...


CONTRACT LAW First Term Unassessed Essay 1. On 2nd January 1999, Sarah reads in a local newspaper, "The Brighton Bugle", that a well known local sports enthusiast, Mick Muscle, was offering �5,000 to the first person to swim from Southsea to the Isle of Wight before 10th January, 1999. Sarah, a keen swimmer, set about her preparations. On 6th January, 1999, a retraction appeared in "The Hove Herald' stating that Mick's original offer was cancelled and, instead, the prize was now to be �500 to the first person to cycle from Brighton to Oxford before 12th January, 1999. Sarah was a regular reader of "The Brighton Bugle" and no other newspaper. She did not see the retraction in "The Hove Herald". On 9th January, Sarah went down to the beach at Southsea to commence her swim to the Isle of Wight. A bystander, who identified himself as Rick Muscle (Mick's brother), told her that the swimming prize had been cancelled and she should "go and get her cycling gear on". Sarah disregarded this statement and proceeded with her swim. Rick Muscle notified his brother, Mick, who promptly hired a boat and caught up with Sarah in the middle of her swim. Mick shouted at her through a megaphone, telling her of the withdrawal of the reward for the swim. Sarah was not deterred and completed her swim to the Isle of Wight. ...read more.


of the Principles of European Contract Law, and as illustrated in the case of Shuey v United States.10 In this case there had been a notice published offering a reward for information which would lead to the capture of a criminal. Seven months later another notice was published revoking the offer. The plaintiff 'discovered the whereabouts of the criminal'11 the following year and notified the authorities with the intention of claiming the reward, as he had been unaware of the revocation of the offer. It was held that he was not entitled to the reward. The fact that he was not aware of the revocation was held to be irrelevant, since 'it was withdrawn through the same channel through which it was made'12 and he 'should have known that it could be revoked in the manner in which it was made'.13 A second attempt was made to revoke the offer, which clearly indicates that 'reasonable steps were taken' as in Shuey, by Mick arriving at the beach and informing Sarah that the swimming competition had been called off. The general rule is that revocation need not be communicated by the offeree, but may be made by a reliable third party, as in the case of Dickinson v Dodds14. In this case the defendant, Mr Dodds, wrote to the plaintiff, Mr Dickinson, agreeing to sell him his house, and added that the offer would be held over for two days. ...read more.


Authority for this can be found in the case of Williams v Cawardine20 where the defendant offered a reward for information leading to the conviction of a murderer. The plaintiff knew of this offer and gave information that it was her husband after he had beaten her, believing she had not long to live and to ease her conscience. It was held that the plaintiff was entitled to the reward as she knew about it and her motive in giving the information was irrelevant. In conclusion, it is doubtful whether Sarah would have any claim for the swimming prize, since it appears there had been an effective revocation of the offer by Mick's brother at the beach. She would also not be entitled to the prize for cycling to Oxford, as she had not known of the offer until after her return from Oxford to Brighton. 1 McKendrick, E. 2003. Contract Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. Oxford University Press. P63. 2 [1968] 1 WLR 1204 3 Op.Cit. Note 1 4 Collins, H. 1997. The Law of Contract. London. Butterworths. P60. 5 [1893] 1 QB 256, CA 6 Op. Cit. Note 1. p.50 7 Ibid. p127 8 Byrne & Co v Van TienHoven & Co (1879) 5 CPD 344 9 Op.Cit. Note 1. p.130 10 (1875) 92 US 73. 11 Op.Cit. Note 1. p. 130 12 Op.Cit. Note 9. Judgement of Strong J 13 Ibid. 14 (1876) 2 Ch D 463 15 [1952] 1 KB 290 16Op.Cit. Note 1.P 124 17Ibid. p.126 18 (1927) 40 CLR 227 19Op.Cit. Note 1. p127 20 (1833) 5 C & P 566 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Law of Contract section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Law of Contract essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Using relevant case law explain why the distinction between an invitation to treat and ...

    3 star(s)

    The plaintiff went to park his car in the defendant's automatic car park. A notice was visible at the entrance stating the charges and a sign-'cars parked at own risk'. Plaintiff took a ticket from the machine. The ticket stated the time of arrival and small print that it was

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Contract Law - Offer And Acceptance

    3 star(s)

    legally enforceable open contract for the sale of land by G's written acceptance of it. It was a letter setting out the financial terms on which it may be the council would be prepared to consider a sale and purchase in due course.

  1. Contract Law - offer and acceptance.

    This raises the issue whether instantaneous communication of acceptance is effective when it is received by the offeror or when it is read by the offeror? The case of Entores v. Miles Far East Corporation 1955, held that postal rules, which would mean that acceptance was effective when it is

  2. Offer and Acceptance

    It was held that his claim must fail, as they believed he was in the same position as if he had never heard of the reward.


    Where the person making the statement has specialist knowledge over and above that of the other, the statement is more likely to be a term. Where the other party has a greater knowledge than the person making the statement, it is more likely to be regarded as a representation.


    By the inner house of the court of session that there was no contract. Lord Macdonald the Lord Justice Clerk stated that: whatever might have been the law formerly, the law of Scotland is now that a sale by auction is complete when the auctioneer announces its completion by the fall of the hammer or in other customary manner.

  1. Invitation To Treat

    The classic case on this point is Scammel v Ouston (1941), in which the court was unable to decide on the precise nature of the offer that was supposed to have been accepted by the plaintiff The issue raised by this question is whether or not the parties intended to be legally bound by their agreement.

  2. Aspects of Contract and Business Law Case Studies

    Therefore his letter of withdrawal from the contract was posted before Alex?s acceptance to the contract and makes his withdrawal valid. Therefore he did have the right to call Alex and not offer him the job because he had already revoked his offer that evening when the letter got into the post.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work