• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

contract law case

Extracts from this document...


X owns a holiday cottage in a remote mountain area. In May he agreed to let it to Y from 1-15 August. Y paid a deposit of � 200. On the afternoon of 31 July, after Y and his family had set off from their home near London, a landslide rendered the cottage uninhabitable. X, who had recently spent � 500 on redecoration in preparation for Y's visit, was unable to contact Y, and Y only found out what had happened when he arrived at the cottage. Y spent � 200 on hotel accommodation for the night before returning home next day. Y and his family were very disappointed at not having the holiday they had planned. Y is now demanding that X should return his deposit and pay him compensation. Advise X. What difference, if any, would it make if the damage to the cottage had been caused by a fire carelessly started by X? ...read more.


Upon discovery of the frustration event one need to examine, whether the effect of the doctrine can be limited as Viscount Simmonds in Taskiroglou stated that this doctrine must be applied within a very narrow limits. As it is not to be invoked lightly to relieve contracting parties of the imprudent commercial bargain (bad bargain) Lord Roskill in Pioneer Shipping. Here Y may argue that the frustration event may be reasonably foreseeable. If the event is foreseeable there is no frustration, Walton & Harvey v Walker & Homfrays. However a person of reasonable intelligence would not have regarded these (landslide) likely to occurs (Treitel) Upon establishing the existence of the frustrating event next one need to examine the extent of remedies. Prior to 1943 the law was as in the case of Fibrosa, which says the loss lies where it falls. This means right and liabilities already acquired up to the time of termination remain intact but subsequent obligations are discharged. ...read more.


But applying the principle in Jackson v Horizon Holiday, Y may able to claim compensation for his family. However the avenue is rejected in Woodar Development v Wimpey Construction, but in Linden Gardens Trust it was stated that if the purpose of the contract that enter on behalf of the 3rd parties is for their enjoyment this is enforceable. With regard to the second part of the question if the damage to the cottage had been caused by a fire carelessly started by X. Then X may not be able to establish frustration. Because frustration must not be self - induced, Maritime National Fish v Ocean Trawler. The burden of proving the events that frustrated the contract is on the party alleging frustration. If there is an allegation of self - induced frustration, the burden lies on the person alleging self - inducement. As from the facts it is clear that the frustrating events is of self - induced frustration and Y bears the burden of proving so. And if Y succeed, the remedy would lie under breach of contract as discussed above. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Law of Contract section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Law of Contract essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Contract Law - Offer And Acceptance

    3 star(s)

    * However, when there is no specific time is stated then the offer is open for a reasonable time which depends on the circumstances, nature of the subject matter and means use to communicate. Ramsgate Victoria Hotel Co v Montefiore (1866)

  2. Four ways in which a contract may be discharged.

    War broke out between Germany and Britain on 3rd September 1939 and Gdansk was occupied by the Germans on 23rd September. (g) A contract will not be frustrated simply because it has become more onerous or expensive to perform than originally envisaged.

  1. The doctrine of frustration

    * As with the above case of Taylor v Caldwell, the courts had implied that the property would be let to the plaintiffs, providing that the existence of the Music Hall was in a state fit for a concert and as such the concerts could not be given without thus.

  2. I have been asked to advise a client on considering contracting with a building ...

    He gave no advance notice and Gye refused to accept his services." It was held that the plaintiff had been engaged to perform for a 15-week season and the failure to attend rehearsals could only affect a small part of this period.

  1. In advising Bennys position of the interest over the said property (the flat), it ...

    Admittedly, it might be "de minimis" in common sense. Particularly, he gave up his full time job as a chef at Peninsular Hotel, in order to look after their son. In principle, this kind of detriment is also "non-financial contribution" required the courts to draw a creative assessment.

  2. Undue influence in the case of Barclays Bank v. O''Brian [1994] Lord Browne-Wilkinson was ...

    In order to establish duress the test in Pao On v. Lau Yiu Long [1980] must be satisfied. Ildar needs to show that he protested at the time of the alleged duress, had no alternative choice, took independent legal

  1. What is the importance of implied terms to the contract of employment

    remained the intellectual property of the 'master' and could not lawfully be used by the employee. A statement from Kentucky Fried Chicken's website discloses that for years its 'secret formula' for fried chickens was carried in 'head', but is today 'locked away in a safe in Louisville, Ky.


    Shirlaw v Southern Foundries [1939] 2 KB 206. "Prima facie that which in any contract is left to be implied and need not be expressed is something so obvious that it goes without saying so that if while the parties were making their bargain an officious bystander were to suggest

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work