• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Contract Law Legal Briefing on Lucy v. Zehmer Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia (196. Va. 493, 84 S.E.2d 516 (1954)

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Ti?Isha Edwards Business 10 Sec ON3 (21116) Briefing on Lucy v. Zehmer Lucy v. Zehmer Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia (196. Va. 493, 84 S.E.2d 516 (1954) BUCHANAN, J. (Justice) Plaintiff: W.O. Lucy (and wife) Defendants: A.H. and Ida Zehmer Facts One night, Lucy stopped in to visit Zehmer at Zehmer?s place of business. Lucy has known Zehmer for close to twenty years; Lucy has also made offers to buy Zehmer?s Ferguson Farm for $50,000 for eight years out of the twenty years of knowing Zehmer. During Lucy and Zehmer?s visit, both parties were engaging in drinking while conversing about Lucy?s interest in purchasing Ferguson Farm for $50,000 among other topics. ...read more.


Lucy filed an appeal. Issue Will the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia considers whether the lower court?s decision to deem the contract unenforceable due to Zehmer?s intoxication (a condition in which a person?s normal capacity to act or think is inhibited by alcohol or some other drug). Was Zehmer?s intention (a reasonable person in the offeree?s position would conclude that the offeror?s words and actions mean) concerning the offer was in jest (not a serious offer) for the sale of Ferguson Farm to Lucy? Decision Yes. Zehmer?s acts and words could be reasonably interpreted by Lucy as an offer to sell his farm. ...read more.


Zehmer and his wife both signed the agreement. These facts provided persuasive evidence that the execution of the contract was a serious business transaction. Reason In contract law, the court looks to the objective, outward expression of a person and not to their secret and unexpressed subjective intent. The test is whether a reasonable person would conclude that the party?s words and actions constituted an offer. In this case, Judgment for Zehmer reversed and remanded. Therefore, the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia reversed the ruling of the lower court and determined that the contract was an enforceable contract. Zehmer is required by the court to uphold is part of the contract (specific performance) and sale the property to Lucy for $50,000 as stated in the contract (the second draft). ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Law of Contract section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Law of Contract essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Contract Law - Offer And Acceptance

    3 star(s)

    D revoked the offer; which arrived on 20 Oct. 11 Oct. P accepted by telegram 15 Oct. P posted a letter confirming acceptance. It was held that the defendant's revocation was not effective until it was received on 20 Oct. This was too late as the contract was made on the 11th when the plaintiff sent a telegram.

  2. e-commerce legal issues

    However, it is necessary to observe the distinction between an offer and an invitation to treat. Invitations to treat are advertisements where merchants promote the sale of products. English law holds that shop displays goods and price listed are invitations to treat4.


    The purchaser ignored this advice and bought the boat. When it proved to be unseaworthy, he sued. 3. THE RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF CONTRACTUAL TERMS. This material in this section is designed for self-study. When you have answered a question yourself turn to the suggested answer.

  2. Undue influence in the case of Barclays Bank v. O''Brian [1994] Lord Browne-Wilkinson was ...

    O'Brian [1994]). In Barclays Bank v. O'Brian [1994] Lord Browne-Wilkinson referred to cohabitees therefore Ann would be classified as a cohabite as she has been living with Derek for three years. Reasonable steps taken by the bank: 1)the bank warns the wife at a meeting not attended by the husband


    Courts don't really like them because they are anti competitive agreements this is because if an employer can't keep a valuable employee then maybe his business deserves to suffer, also why should a person who just sold his business at a large profit be prevented from starting a new business in the same trade or profession.

  2. Four ways in which a contract may be discharged.

    The doctor advised that continuing to perform was likely to cause a major breakdown. (d) The non-occurrence of a particular event which forms the basis of the contract. Krell v Henry [1903] 2 KB 740. The defendant contracted to hire a flat for 26th and 27th June 1902 (Kings Coronation).

  1. I have been asked to advise a client on considering contracting with a building ...

    this constitutes inviting customers to make offers to purchases such items or invitation to treat. An example of this is the case of Fisher V Bell; a shopkeeper was prosecuted for offering for sale an offensive weapon by exhibiting a flick knife in his shop window.

  2. Case Analysis: Christine Brooks v. Cooke County Hospital District

    The employer cannot end the relationship by discriminating the employee on the basis of sex, color, national origin, race and religion. o Public policy: An employer may not terminate an employee for any reason that violates a state's public policy.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work