• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Contract Law Legal Briefing on Lucy v. Zehmer Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia (196. Va. 493, 84 S.E.2d 516 (1954)

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Ti?Isha Edwards Business 10 Sec ON3 (21116) Briefing on Lucy v. Zehmer Lucy v. Zehmer Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia (196. Va. 493, 84 S.E.2d 516 (1954) BUCHANAN, J. (Justice) Plaintiff: W.O. Lucy (and wife) Defendants: A.H. and Ida Zehmer Facts One night, Lucy stopped in to visit Zehmer at Zehmer?s place of business. Lucy has known Zehmer for close to twenty years; Lucy has also made offers to buy Zehmer?s Ferguson Farm for $50,000 for eight years out of the twenty years of knowing Zehmer. During Lucy and Zehmer?s visit, both parties were engaging in drinking while conversing about Lucy?s interest in purchasing Ferguson Farm for $50,000 among other topics. ...read more.


Lucy filed an appeal. Issue Will the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia considers whether the lower court?s decision to deem the contract unenforceable due to Zehmer?s intoxication (a condition in which a person?s normal capacity to act or think is inhibited by alcohol or some other drug). Was Zehmer?s intention (a reasonable person in the offeree?s position would conclude that the offeror?s words and actions mean) concerning the offer was in jest (not a serious offer) for the sale of Ferguson Farm to Lucy? Decision Yes. Zehmer?s acts and words could be reasonably interpreted by Lucy as an offer to sell his farm. ...read more.


Zehmer and his wife both signed the agreement. These facts provided persuasive evidence that the execution of the contract was a serious business transaction. Reason In contract law, the court looks to the objective, outward expression of a person and not to their secret and unexpressed subjective intent. The test is whether a reasonable person would conclude that the party?s words and actions constituted an offer. In this case, Judgment for Zehmer reversed and remanded. Therefore, the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia reversed the ruling of the lower court and determined that the contract was an enforceable contract. Zehmer is required by the court to uphold is part of the contract (specific performance) and sale the property to Lucy for $50,000 as stated in the contract (the second draft). ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Law of Contract section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Law of Contract essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Contract Law - Offer And Acceptance

    3 star(s)

    * The withdrawal must be communicated (postal rule do not apply), and not merely by acting inconsistently. Byrne v Van Tienhoven (1880) Vienna Convention Art 16(1) 1 Oct. D posted a letter offering goods for sale. 8 Oct. D revoked the offer; which arrived on 20 Oct.

  2. e-commerce legal issues

    However, it is necessary to observe the distinction between an offer and an invitation to treat. Invitations to treat are advertisements where merchants promote the sale of products. English law holds that shop displays goods and price listed are invitations to treat4.

  1. Four ways in which a contract may be discharged.

    Technically the claimant was wrongfully dismissed i.e. in breach of his contract of employment. Two partners continued and offered the claimant employment, which he refused and he then tried to claim the wages he would have earned had he not been wrongfully dismissed. Pilkington v Wood [1953] 2 All ER 810.

  2. Undue influence in the case of Barclays Bank v. O''Brian [1994] Lord Browne-Wilkinson was ...

    However, the most usual way of rebutting the presumption is to show that the other party had independent advice before entering into the transaction. Case examples include: Re Craig [1970] 2 All ER 390 Re Brocklehurst [1978] 1 All ER 767.

  1. I have been asked to advise a client on considering contracting with a building ...

    been accepted, but the revocation must be communicated to the offeree, although not necessarily by the offeror. This raises two important points. While posting a letter is a sufficient act of acceptance, it is not a sufficient act of revocation of offer.


    Judges of the 2nd Division went on to consider if a seller could withdraw his property for sale before the fall of the auctioneers hammer. It is the seller that was putting his goods up for an invitation to treat and if the goods are withdrawn then it is indicating


    (c) Terms implied in fact. Terms may be implied because the very nature of the contract requires it or because the application of an objective test makes it apparent that the parties must have intended it. It may be that its omission was a simple mistake or that both parties thought

  2. Aspects of the law affecting construction projects.

    all power [technical, policy making and enforcement was transferred to the Health and Safety Commission and the Health and Safety Executive. Successful legal challenges are often mounted on the basis that the legislation is ultra vires ? beyond its powers and void.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work