• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Court proceedings.

Extracts from this document...


Court proceedings are the most public manifestation of the criminal justice process, the arena in which justice is very literally "seen to be done". This is especially true of the trial, generally assumed to be the stage in the process where the defendant has his or her day in court and the opportunity to assert innocence. The trial is a vial part of the adversarial system, and as we have seen the right to trial by one's peers, represented by the jury system, and as we have seen the right to trial by one's peers, represented by the jury system, is seen as a fundamental protection for the defendant against the power of the state. A Crown court trial has some of the appearance of a theatrical performance with costumes, ceremony, dramatic settings and seating for audience. These dramatic qualities are also evident in the cross-examination of witness to see who will play their part well, and the speeches of counsel to win the sympathy of the jury. They play out their roles in line with the adversarial principles of the trial. The prosecution and the defence counsel present their arguments before a judge whose role is to ensure a fair trial, and the jury, who must decide on the guilt, or not, of the defendant. The real life drama of the trial lies in its public examination of and formal adjudication upon matters of human weakness and wickedness. At a more prosaic level, the trial seeks to establish the guilt, or otherwise, of the accused. ...read more.


Misconduct by the jury or a jury member outside the confines of the jury room can, however, be a ground for appeal. If the problem is discovered during trial, it can be a reason for the judge to discharge the juror or the whole jury. The use of juries has been a subject of conflicting views among lawyers, politicians and the public at large. The arguments in favour of the jury involve fundamental principles developed over the centuries. The right to a trial by jury involves the concept of being tried by one's peers. It is therefore essential to this principle that jury members be chosen from a random selection of a population. In this way, lay members of the public are involved in justice. Fears of oppressive laws and governments also underlie the argument that juries can effect the law itself. In so-called 'equity' verdicts juries have acquitted on the grounds that they do not think the law is right even where the accused has quite clearly committed the act. This was apparently the situation in 1986 when Clive Ponting was prosecuted under the Official Secrets Act and acquitted by the jury despite a clear directive by the judge that he had no defence. Jurors may not wish to see the defendant receive a harsher punishment than they feel is deserved - juries during the 1950's, for example, often acquitted by the jury despite a clear directive by the judge that he had no defence. Jurors may not wish to see the defendant receive a harsher punishment than they feel is deserved - juries during the 1950's for example, often acquitted drivers accused of manslaughter. ...read more.


However, fifteen years ago, in a celebrated case, a jury learnt how nervous a householder in a secluded mansion in Kent had heard noises in his garden. When he went to see what was going on, he came face to face with an intruder - a man who had no right to be there. There was a struggle and the intruder was killed. But the jury, considering the evidence accepted his account of how he had been frightened for his life - despite the fact that he had been armed and the intruder had not - and acquitted him on the grounds of self-defence. The mansion in question was a big mock-Tudor affair set in 20 acres of land near West Kingsdown. The intruder was a highly respected undercover detective called John Fordham and he was there because the police suspected that the mansion's owner had been involved in the Brinks-Mat bullion robbery. The owner stabbed John Fordham to death. His name was Kenneth Noye. The jury let him go. Kenneth Noye was recently imprisoned, convicted of murder after being found guilty of killing a man in a road rage incident on the M25 motorway. The uncertainty of the jury in their way of thinking would most ultimately result in the uncertainty of laws as well. Some have advocated the abolition of the jury; replacing the jury with lay accessors or allowing the judge to decide not only on the law, but also on guilt and innocence. Others fear the power which would be placed in the Royal Commission on Criminal Justice (Lord Runciman 1993) did not recommend the abolition of juries but recommended that the law be amended in order that the matter could be fully assessed. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Machinery of Justice section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Machinery of Justice essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    ‘Trial by jury is outdated, expensive and ineffective in ensuring justice’ Analyse arguments for ...

    4 star(s)

    years, as well as those who have served a community service penalty or a custodial sentence in the previous ten years (Davies et al, 1998:209). Those who have served a custodial sentence of more than five years are disqualified for their entire lives under the Juries (Disqualification)

  2. 'Juries are anti-democratic, irrational and haphazard.' To what extent do you think that this ...

    Although jurors should not discuss the case during the course of the trial it is practically impossible to avoid the opinions of reporters and newsreaders. Then the jurors may suffer from the post traumatic stress disorder in the period after trials which involve horrific crimes, such as murder and rape,

  1. Explain how jurors are chosen and the role of the jury in a crown ...

    The open system of justice makes the legal system more open because members of public involved and the whole process in public. On the other hand the juries weigh up the information given in private and no one can inquire into what happened in the jury room.

  2. What justification was there for Socrates' trial, verdict and death sentence?

    Therefore, there was prejudice against this 'God,' and Socrates could have been despised for following it, and basing his life mission and philosophising on its prophesy. I believe this is not fair, because the Athenians, probably including the jury members, remembered old times and were bias towards this charge.

  1. The European Court of Justice ensures that European law is applied throughout the member ...

    leaving the member states to create their own detailed legislation in order to put those objectives into practice. As a result, it was originally assumed by most member states that directives could not have direct effect and would not create individual rights until they had been translated in domestic legislation.

  2. Describe trial by jury within the English legal system. How effective is trial by ...

    5 of the Juries Act 1974 to challenge to the whole jury on the basis that it has been chosen in an unrepresentative or biased way. For example In 1987 R v Fraser the defendant was of an ethnic minority background, but all the jurors were white.

  1. "If the Constitution is the source of governmental power, and the judiciary interprets the ...

    What I have described above is the intellectual basis for the power that this most powerful of courts has. The question that now needs to be posed when deciding if the "judiciary is the most powerful branch of government. Discuss" is what kind of power this intellectual basis grants to the Judiciary and in particular the Supreme Court.

  2. Explain the role of the CCRC (Criminal Cases Review Commission)

    1998 the Court of Appeal held that the summing up by the Judge was not satisfactory and quashed the conviction. Derek Bentley was a 19 year old boy hung after last-minute appeals for clemency were rejected. Bentley was sentenced to death on 11 December for killing Pc Miles during a bungled break-in at a warehouse in Croydon, Surrey.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work