• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Critically consider the proposition that trial by jury has out lived its usefulness and that it should, in the interests of justice and as a matter of some urgency, be abolished.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Critically consider the proposition that trial by jury has outlived its usefulness and that it should, in the interests of justice and as a matter of some urgency, be abolished. In order to critically evaluate the positive and negative aspects of the jury system it is essential that firstly, the purpose of a jury is established then secondly, we analyse whether the current system is fulfilling that purpose. The purpose can be segregated into three distinct principles1. The first is that the jury must decide the facts of the case and based upon those facts, determine guilt. Secondly, the jury adds certainty to the law. This means that when the jury delivers its verdict of either guilty or not guilty, it does so without giving reason and that verdict is not open to dispute. Thirdly, the jury provides what may be termed as the "just face" of the criminal justice system, insofar as the jury can arrive at its decision using any manner it chooses. In particular, the jury has been known to arrive at an acquittal on the basis of it conscience2, which will be examined later. ...read more.

Middle

If there is true value in involving the public within the criminal process, the jury surely must be allowed to arrive at a decision that may be contrary to the law. This provides an influence of "community conscience" and in fact may be viewed as the jury exercising its constitutional role to arrive at a decision. Whether the juries' verdict may be described as "perverse" depends upon the perception of the role of the jury in the decision making process. If a narrow approach is taken, a verdict is proper if it is reached after an honest, careful and reasonable attempt to apply the law to the facts of the case, taking no other circumstances into account. This will no doubt provide a more certain and consistent outcome but will probably result in a greater number of guilty verdicts. A broader approach would consist of a verdict which has been reached after evaluation of the evidence, which indicated a guilty verdict, provided an acquittal based on a reasonable exercise of discretion in favour of the accused reflecting the jury's sympathy, clemency or disapproval of the prosecution. ...read more.

Conclusion

It could be recommended that the jury should be required to undertake a competency test in order to determine their suitability for jury service. This can be counteracted by the requirement to obtain a fair representation of society with a wide cross section of people. Dave Wilcox, an Engineer for the Environment Agency has recently undertaken jury service at Liverpool Crown Court. During his two weeks service he spent three days productive time on cases whilst the remainder was spent in the waiting area. He said "there were approximately three hundred people there at the time. It must have cost a fortune." Dave spen 1 P. Duff and M. Findlay, "The Jury in England: Practice and Ideology" (1982) 10 International Journal of the Sociology of Law 253. 2 T.A. Green, Verdict According to Conscience, 1200-1800 (1985). 3 Zander, Cases and Materials on the English Legal System, Butterworths (1993) 6th Edition. 4 "Jurors' Deliberations, Jury Service, Public Policy and the Law of Contempt" in Findlay and Duff (1988), pp. 62-65. 5 Fraud Trials Committee: Report; Chair: Lord Roskill (1986). Legal Skills and System 2 LLB (Hons) Part Time Page 1 09/05/2007 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Machinery of Justice section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Machinery of Justice essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    ‘Trial by jury is outdated, expensive and ineffective in ensuring justice’ Analyse arguments for ...

    4 star(s)

    This method of selection from the members of the general public was designed with the intention of creating random selection from the local population. Jury selection has also become a focal point for the government in the last fifteen years.

  2. The jury system or right to a trial by jury is often described as ...

    community punishment order, community punishment and rehabilitation order, drug treatment and testing order or drug abstinence order, or who is on bail in criminal proceedings will be disqualified from jury service. Previously, certain types of individuals such as policemen or those serving in the judiciary were disqualified from jury service.

  1. Critically analyse the relationship between law and justice.

    Since 1999, the law is measured against the Human Rights Act to ensure fairness. This act makes it unlawful for the "public authority" to act in a way which is incompatible with a convention right. However, there is a major flaw because "public authority" does not include Parliament itself or

  2. A critical evaluation of labelling theory.

    Labelling theorists claim that the behavior of the individual in question is only one factor when bestowing a criminal label on them. They also go so far as to claim that the criminal justice system could even create crime rather than preventing it.

  1. What justification was there for Socrates' trial, verdict and death sentence?

    The second charge was also in a way unfair, because there was a policy of freedom of speech at that time in Athens. He talked about his daimon, which was not a traditional god, but to be brought to trial for this would be contradicting this 'freedom.'

  2. Trial by jury is more than an instrument of justice and more than one ...

    This Act was claimed to protect the jury from outside influence and allows them to bring in unpopular verdict. However, there is no way of knowing whether the jury truly understand the nature of the case and reach the decision for the right reasons.

  1. Balancing Competing Interests

    As seen in private nuisance the law is concerned at achieving a balance between an occupier's quiet enjoyment of his or her land and a neighbour's legitimate use of his/her land. As seen in Miller v Jackson, the conflict involved an application for an injunction against a cricket club.

  2. Expert Testimony and Its Value In the Justice System

    One of these key issues highlighted is the fact that in theory the role of an expert witness? testimony is to convey their knowledge to a jury so that the jury can make an informed decision upon the evidence which the testimony relates.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work