• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Critically evaluate the aims and consequences of sentencing and show how the laws regarding sentencing currently stand in England and Wales.

Extracts from this document...


Criminal Justice: Assignment 1 In this assignment I intend to critically evaluate the aims and consequences of sentencing and show how the laws regarding sentencing currently stand in England and Wales. I will show how sentencing an offender works, and how judges come to their decisions. I also intend to show what the aims of sentencing set out to achieve. Sentencing is a particularly important aspect in the Criminal Justice System in operation within England and Wales. It must be determined, to define what sentencing does, what it can do what it could achieve and whether or not it endorses the aims it is given. At present, there is not one specific aim of the Criminal Justice System. According to the current Home Office Statement which has been released, the aims of the Criminal Justice System is "to build a safe, just and tolerant society, in which rights and responsibilities of individuals, families and communities are balanced, and the protection and security of the public are maintained". There are many opinions as to what sentences are actually meant to achieve. Punishment is categorised as guilt, blame, pain or humiliation. Many of the general public believe that a sentence should be passed to punish an offender although in some cases this may not necessarily be the correct sentence to pass. ...read more.


As a result, sentencing law violates the rule of law's virtues of consistency and fairness". This, in layman's terms means that sentencing is designed to be individualistic rather than generalistic. This makes sense, as no two crimes are ever exactly the same, and is a very European way of looking at sentencing, as opposed to the United States way of being very generalistic. Murder is the only offence in this country which carries the fixed sentence of life imprisonment. Every other offence carries a maximum sentence although some public order offences do not carry any sentence other than an order to keep the peace. However, under the Powers of Criminal Courts (sentencing) Act (2000) a 'three strikes' system was introduced. Ss.109 states that you will get a life sentence for your second serious offence committed. Ss 110 states the same for drug trafficking and s.s 111 says that domestic burglary will receive the same penalty. There is a minimum of three years for the third offence, which is an attempt to impose some form of fixed sentencing. However, the government put in some discretion by stating that this can only be done whereby in may cause extreme injustice. For this reason, there have been very few offenders given a life sentence for their second serious offence. ...read more.


[Jan 31st 2003] CA Hall was convicted of 2 counts of sexual intercourse with a 12yr old girl. He pleaded guilty before trial, but aggravated the offence in such that the age difference was 20yrs and as well as the fact that he instigated the offence, the girl was in the same class as his son at school. In Ingham (1980) 2 Cr App R (S) 184 it was shown that voluntary work taken on by the offender can show remorse as there is more recognition of social acceptability. I believe that sentencing does consist in trying to settle a number of totally conflicting facts. In some circumstances it may be easier to have fixed sentences for offences; however with the Human Rights Act 1998 now in force, it may not work. If a court did not take into consideration any reasons for why an offender had committed the offence then the right to a fair trial may be raised by the offender. On the other hand, it could also be stated that people should not commit crimes anyway, so why should they get any special considerations when they get caught? Sentencing is always going to be a difficult matter where the courts are concerned. There will always be people who commit crimes and therefore if the courts do not want to be bound by their previous decisions then it will carry on to be one big circle with respect to the guidelines of sentencing. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Machinery of Justice section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Machinery of Justice essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Briefly outline the various sentencing options available to the courts for both over and ...

    4 star(s)

    * Confiscation and civil recovery order - linked to a compensation order. As magistrates' courts can only award a fine of up to �5000, the courts may confiscate property stolen by the offender and return it to the victim to make up for amount of money due.

  2. The winslow boy

    Sir Roberts talks as if he is in court using legal phrases 'Ronnie I would like the truth. That is the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth.' The audience doesn't know whether to feel sorry for Ronnie or not.

  1. Free essay

    Critically discuss whether the criminal courts of England and Wales require substantial reform. Firstly ...

    that the offence breaks an important legal rule in the society and the rule may also be moral but is not so therefore society punishes the person who has committed the offence. In criminal cases it is up to the prosecution to prove the offence beyond all reasonable doubt.

  2. Explain the ranges of sentences available to the judge or magistrate.

    Deterrence is the second main theory of punishment and it aims to reduce crime by the threat or example of punishment. Unlike retributive theories, deterrent theories are forward looking, concerning themselves with the consequence of punishment. Deterrence operates on several levels.

  1. Notes on Sentencing in British courts

    & Was defendant in position of trust? o In assault, what injuries, &was it premeditated. Was victim particularly vulnerable (elderly) or racially motivated? o Premeditated usually considered worse than spare of moment. o Being in position of trust also worse. * Where several defendants convicted for same crime court try to find who planned it and who played greater part.

  2. Is any act of statutory interpretation a arbitrary choice by a judge?

    Traditionally, the courts had taken a 'literal approach' to statutory interpretation. The origin of its use is traceable from the words of Lord Tenterten CJ in Brandling v Barrington (1827). "It is much better and safer to rely on and abide by the plain words, although the Legislature might possibly

  1. Penal Studies for Professional Practice

    Also, Foreign National female offenders arrested and sentenced on entrance into the United Kingdom, may not have any friends or relatives who they can rely upon for help. Finally drugs appear to be a significant factor in women's offending, as many women get caught up in petty crime to feed

  2. The approach of the courts to sentencing is far too slack. Discuss how ...

    Its structure is as follows: Judge Y sentences defendant Z to X number of years. The prosecutor argues for >X years and the victim?s family is outraged at the farce. When they are interviewed by journalists, the family vociferously declare their horror at the judge, and it is the media which reverberates that sentiment.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work