• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Critically evaluate the aims and consequences of sentencing and show how the laws regarding sentencing currently stand in England and Wales.

Extracts from this document...


Criminal Justice: Assignment 1 In this assignment I intend to critically evaluate the aims and consequences of sentencing and show how the laws regarding sentencing currently stand in England and Wales. I will show how sentencing an offender works, and how judges come to their decisions. I also intend to show what the aims of sentencing set out to achieve. Sentencing is a particularly important aspect in the Criminal Justice System in operation within England and Wales. It must be determined, to define what sentencing does, what it can do what it could achieve and whether or not it endorses the aims it is given. At present, there is not one specific aim of the Criminal Justice System. According to the current Home Office Statement which has been released, the aims of the Criminal Justice System is "to build a safe, just and tolerant society, in which rights and responsibilities of individuals, families and communities are balanced, and the protection and security of the public are maintained". There are many opinions as to what sentences are actually meant to achieve. Punishment is categorised as guilt, blame, pain or humiliation. Many of the general public believe that a sentence should be passed to punish an offender although in some cases this may not necessarily be the correct sentence to pass. ...read more.


As a result, sentencing law violates the rule of law's virtues of consistency and fairness". This, in layman's terms means that sentencing is designed to be individualistic rather than generalistic. This makes sense, as no two crimes are ever exactly the same, and is a very European way of looking at sentencing, as opposed to the United States way of being very generalistic. Murder is the only offence in this country which carries the fixed sentence of life imprisonment. Every other offence carries a maximum sentence although some public order offences do not carry any sentence other than an order to keep the peace. However, under the Powers of Criminal Courts (sentencing) Act (2000) a 'three strikes' system was introduced. Ss.109 states that you will get a life sentence for your second serious offence committed. Ss 110 states the same for drug trafficking and s.s 111 says that domestic burglary will receive the same penalty. There is a minimum of three years for the third offence, which is an attempt to impose some form of fixed sentencing. However, the government put in some discretion by stating that this can only be done whereby in may cause extreme injustice. For this reason, there have been very few offenders given a life sentence for their second serious offence. ...read more.


[Jan 31st 2003] CA Hall was convicted of 2 counts of sexual intercourse with a 12yr old girl. He pleaded guilty before trial, but aggravated the offence in such that the age difference was 20yrs and as well as the fact that he instigated the offence, the girl was in the same class as his son at school. In Ingham (1980) 2 Cr App R (S) 184 it was shown that voluntary work taken on by the offender can show remorse as there is more recognition of social acceptability. I believe that sentencing does consist in trying to settle a number of totally conflicting facts. In some circumstances it may be easier to have fixed sentences for offences; however with the Human Rights Act 1998 now in force, it may not work. If a court did not take into consideration any reasons for why an offender had committed the offence then the right to a fair trial may be raised by the offender. On the other hand, it could also be stated that people should not commit crimes anyway, so why should they get any special considerations when they get caught? Sentencing is always going to be a difficult matter where the courts are concerned. There will always be people who commit crimes and therefore if the courts do not want to be bound by their previous decisions then it will carry on to be one big circle with respect to the guidelines of sentencing. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Machinery of Justice section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Machinery of Justice essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Briefly outline the various sentencing options available to the courts for both over and ...

    4 star(s)

    * Suspended sentence - an offender may be given a suspended sentence for up to 2 years (6 months for magistrates' courts). Any further offence committed within that period activates the prison sentence and the offender will serve that sentence along with any sentence for the new crime.

  2. The winslow boy

    Much of the scene is building up to the visit by Sir Robert Morton, a very successful barrister, who is coming to interview Ronnie. He is a very expensive and well known for never having lost a case before in his career.

  1. Free essay

    Critically discuss whether the criminal courts of England and Wales require substantial reform. Firstly ...

    that the offence breaks an important legal rule in the society and the rule may also be moral but is not so therefore society punishes the person who has committed the offence. In criminal cases it is up to the prosecution to prove the offence beyond all reasonable doubt.

  2. The Death Penalty in Canada. There are many issues surrounding the rebirth of ...

    While many of these judgments may be subconscious they sadly still exist, and when it comes to capital punishment they may be deadly. Statistically, men are far more likely to be given the death penalty than womenvii. This can also be attributed to the fact that pregnant women may not be executedviii, and obviously men cannot become pregnant.

  1. To what extent is it still true to say that legal justice in England ...

    The civil justice system Civil justice is fundamentally concerned with the resolution of disputes, this type of system includes all the ways in which people can lawfully resolve disputes and implement their rights and obligations. There has been and still is a need for reform of the civil justice system,

  2. Expert Testimony and Its Value In the Justice System

    This allows differences in opinion to be found immediately but also allows an opportunity for the experts to explain their differing views. If they cannot reach upon an agreement then it is still easier for the judge, or jury, to make a decision on which evidence to believe as they

  1. The approach of the courts to sentencing is far too slack. Discuss how ...

    The media are at least partly to blame for this shift in the purpose of sentencing. Take the hypothetical situation of an alcohol fuelled car crash which kills two of four passengers. The judge may sentence the defendant to five years, but the prosecutor may demand 9 years.

  2. Arguing in Favour of the Death Penalty

    Capital punishment is a highly debated issue today and has been since it was implemented. Until there is a change in society it will remain a hot button issue to be debated. Changes are needed to make the process better as a whole but it should never be abolished.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work