• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Critically evaluate the aims and consequences of sentencing and show how the laws regarding sentencing currently stand in England and Wales.

Extracts from this document...


Criminal Justice: Assignment 1 In this assignment I intend to critically evaluate the aims and consequences of sentencing and show how the laws regarding sentencing currently stand in England and Wales. I will show how sentencing an offender works, and how judges come to their decisions. I also intend to show what the aims of sentencing set out to achieve. Sentencing is a particularly important aspect in the Criminal Justice System in operation within England and Wales. It must be determined, to define what sentencing does, what it can do what it could achieve and whether or not it endorses the aims it is given. At present, there is not one specific aim of the Criminal Justice System. According to the current Home Office Statement which has been released, the aims of the Criminal Justice System is "to build a safe, just and tolerant society, in which rights and responsibilities of individuals, families and communities are balanced, and the protection and security of the public are maintained". There are many opinions as to what sentences are actually meant to achieve. Punishment is categorised as guilt, blame, pain or humiliation. Many of the general public believe that a sentence should be passed to punish an offender although in some cases this may not necessarily be the correct sentence to pass. ...read more.


As a result, sentencing law violates the rule of law's virtues of consistency and fairness". This, in layman's terms means that sentencing is designed to be individualistic rather than generalistic. This makes sense, as no two crimes are ever exactly the same, and is a very European way of looking at sentencing, as opposed to the United States way of being very generalistic. Murder is the only offence in this country which carries the fixed sentence of life imprisonment. Every other offence carries a maximum sentence although some public order offences do not carry any sentence other than an order to keep the peace. However, under the Powers of Criminal Courts (sentencing) Act (2000) a 'three strikes' system was introduced. Ss.109 states that you will get a life sentence for your second serious offence committed. Ss 110 states the same for drug trafficking and s.s 111 says that domestic burglary will receive the same penalty. There is a minimum of three years for the third offence, which is an attempt to impose some form of fixed sentencing. However, the government put in some discretion by stating that this can only be done whereby in may cause extreme injustice. For this reason, there have been very few offenders given a life sentence for their second serious offence. ...read more.


[Jan 31st 2003] CA Hall was convicted of 2 counts of sexual intercourse with a 12yr old girl. He pleaded guilty before trial, but aggravated the offence in such that the age difference was 20yrs and as well as the fact that he instigated the offence, the girl was in the same class as his son at school. In Ingham (1980) 2 Cr App R (S) 184 it was shown that voluntary work taken on by the offender can show remorse as there is more recognition of social acceptability. I believe that sentencing does consist in trying to settle a number of totally conflicting facts. In some circumstances it may be easier to have fixed sentences for offences; however with the Human Rights Act 1998 now in force, it may not work. If a court did not take into consideration any reasons for why an offender had committed the offence then the right to a fair trial may be raised by the offender. On the other hand, it could also be stated that people should not commit crimes anyway, so why should they get any special considerations when they get caught? Sentencing is always going to be a difficult matter where the courts are concerned. There will always be people who commit crimes and therefore if the courts do not want to be bound by their previous decisions then it will carry on to be one big circle with respect to the guidelines of sentencing. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Machinery of Justice section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Machinery of Justice essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Briefly outline the various sentencing options available to the courts for both over and ...

    4 star(s)

    Where the failure to properly maintain and service the railway tracks led to the deaths of 4 and the injuring of many more passengers. Balfour Beatty was fined a record �10 million. Advantages of fines are that it provides alternate income for the justice system and due to human nature towards money, it provides for an excellent deterrent.

  2. Free essay

    Critically discuss whether the criminal courts of England and Wales require substantial reform. Firstly ...

    Either way offences are indictable offences which can be tried in the Magistrates Court or Crown Court depending on the nature of seriousness of the case. Examples include theft, assault causing actually bodily harm and counterfeiting offences. All criminal cases start in the magistrates' court.

  1. The Death Penalty in Canada. There are many issues surrounding the rebirth of ...

    Again this shows criminals that the death penalty is not a deterrent because they may go unpunished and have an innocent person take the blame for themxiv. There is no doubt that capital punishment is a flawed system that raises the risk of the unjust deaths of innocent persons and

  2. Describe the different aims of sentencing.

    In addition it is usually the fear of being caught that is more of a deterrent and that while crime detection rates are low, the threat of an unpleasant penalty, if caught, seems to be remote.

  1. To what extent is it still true to say that legal justice in England ...

    in the past, the traditional culture of adversarialism took priority in courts whereas at present and in the last century there has been much proposal for co-operation between disputing parties. In the history of English policy there had been countless attempts at reforming the civil system in order to achieve

  2. Notes on Sentencing in British courts

    & Was defendant in position of trust? o In assault, what injuries, &was it premeditated. Was victim particularly vulnerable (elderly) or racially motivated? o Premeditated usually considered worse than spare of moment. o Being in position of trust also worse. * Where several defendants convicted for same crime court try to find who planned it and who played greater part.

  1. A critical evaluation of labelling theory.

    They argued that due to the nature of capitalist society more attention is drawn to the crimes of the working class, while crimes of the ruling class tend to go un-noticed. Labelling theorists fail to focus much on the obvious connection between the economic order and the criminal justice system.

  2. The Penal System - Discuss the aims of sentencing and consider other factors the ...

    the Sentencing Advisory Panel with the power to propose to the Court of Appeal (criminal) that sentencing guidelines should be made or revised for certain crimes. However one of the most powerful arguments against such minimum tariff sentences is that it does not allow for any mitigating, influencing or situational

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work