• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Critically evaluate the meaning of the term

Extracts from this document...


Q: Critically evaluate the meaning of the term "Recklessness" to describe an aspect of Mens Rea (Guilty Mind) and explain how it is currently applied to offences in the English Law System. A: In everyday language, Recklessness means to take an unjustified risk. However, its legal definition is not quite the same. To find out the meaning of Recklessness, careful direction is to be given to the jury. There are tow types of Recklessness, which were named after the cases they were defined in: R v Cunningham (1957), which is the Subjective version of Recklessness and MPC v Caldwell (1982), which is the Objective version of Recklessness. The dictionary meaning of reckless is to be careless, thoughtless, incautious, heedless, unheeding, regardless, daredevil, madcap, wild, irresponsible, unwise, indiscreet, mindless or negligent. Recklessness is a form of Mens Rea (Guilty Mind). Mens Rea is the Latin for 'guilty mind' and traditionally refers to the state of mind of the person committing the crime. ...read more.


They defined recklessness as foreseeing that the kind of harm that in fact occurred might occur, and going ahead anyway. This is called a subjective test: the accused must actually have been reckless if he realised there was a risk of the gas escaping and endangering someone, and went ahead anyway. His conviction was in fact quashed because of misdirection at the trial. The Objective test was used in the case of MPC v Caldwell 1982, this was the case were an ex-employee of a hotel nursed a grudge against its owner. He started a fire at the hotel, which caused some damage and was charged with arson. This offence is defined in the Criminal Damage Act 1971 as requiring either recklessness or intention. On the fact, there was no intention and, on the issue of recklessness, Lord Diplock stated that the definition of recklessness in Cunningham was too narrow for the Criminal Damage Act 1971. For the Act, he said recklessness should not only include the Cunningham meaning, but also go further. ...read more.


But having two tests for the same word causes confusion and is unnecessary. As the law currently stands, concern has been expressed that the higher the Cunningham standard is applied to rape, the lower Caldwell standard is applied to criminal damage. This means that the property is better protected than people. Other problems with recklessness are that there is a lower threshold for liability. The adoption of Caldwell recklessness means that a Mens Rea generally considered less morally blameworthy than Cunningham recklessness is being applied to some serious offences. Additionally, there is an overlap with negligence. The Caldwell test has blurred the distinction between recklessness and negligence. Before Caldwell, there was an obvious difference: recklessness mean knowingly taking a risk; negligence traditional meant unknowingly taking a risk of which you should have been aware. Caldwell clearly comes very close to negligence. Furthermore, the lacuna. The case of R v Merrick has been criticised as unrealistic. In practice, replacing electrical equipment often creates a temporary danger, which cannot be avoided, yet technically each time in criminal law the electrician is reckless. RECKLESSNESS By Roman Monaf ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Law of Tort section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Law of Tort essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Taking selected areas of the civil and or criminal law, evaluate whether sportsmen and ...

    4 star(s)

    The situation regarding spectators has now dramatically changed over the past thirty years as stadiums are now mainly seated with controlled numbers and more police closely controlling crowds. This has resulted in fewer injuries occurring at sports grounds. One of the major cases (as mentioned above)

  2. Marked by a teacher

    "The Nedrick/Woolin direction on intention manages to produce a clear distinction between intention and ...

    4 star(s)

    a member of the bomb disposal team as a virtual certainty' and therefore would not be classified as a murderer. The terrorist would be convicted of manslaughter under the Nedrick/Woollin direction, which although may result in the terrorist being sentenced to life, still does not seem acceptable.

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Homicide Act 1957

    3 star(s)

    manslaughter or gross negligence manslaughter. Unlawful act manslaughter requires three elements to be proven, that the D caused an unlawful act (R v. Lamb) that this was a dangerous act (R v. Church), which was a direct cause of the V's death (R v.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Critically evaluate the principles governing the law on Intoxication.

    3 star(s)

    He appealed and the Court of Appeal held it did not amount to involuntary intoxication and he was charged as though he had been voluntarily intoxicated. If the defendant had the required mens rea of the offence and the only effect of the alcohol was to make the defendant more

  1. Consider the meaning and importance of fault-based liability in English law

    The highest level of fault comes in crimes which were committed intentionally, with the defendant setting out to commit the crime, perhaps having planned it first. The next type of fault is recklessness, which following G v R will always be subjective, which is less serious as there was no intention to commit the crime.

  2. What is the meaning of intention in English criminal law? Is it always possible ...

    If he foresaw death as virtually certain, this is a matter of factual evidence from which the jury may infer that the defendant intended that death.code der sededew orde dek inde fode de. Section 8 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988 supported these more recent decisions:codd ddr seddddw ordd ddk indd fodd dd!

  1. Discuss the meaning of fault on the basis for criminal liability. Explain and evaluate ...

    Courts have developed duress of circumstances, allowing defendants to escape liability when they face imminent death/serious injury if they did not commit a crime. In Abdul-Hussain (1999) Shiites escaping Iraw hijacked a plane, forcing it to land in the UK.

  2. In this report, the differences between contractual liability and tortuous liability are explained. In ...

    course of the agent's duties assigned by the principal; and an employer for the action or inaction of an employee in the normal course of her or her employment or duties 3.3.2. Employer?s liability Employers are the group most commonly held vicariously liable.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work