• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Dealing with problems of offer and acceptance.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Contents 1. Introduction 2 2. Contractual effect of the advertisement 2 3. Offer by telephone by Rob 3 4. Rob's reply by letter 3 5. Sale to Sunita 4 6. Bibliography 5 1. Introduction In dealing with problems of offer and acceptance, the Courts have taken a strict approach, stating that there must be clear offer and acceptance in order to create a binding contract. As such, offers must be clear on their terms and capable of acceptance and can only be accepted on terms that mirror the offer, as established in the case of Gibson v Manchester City Council (1979) 1. There are dicta in certain cases, notably in the judgments of Lord Denning MR, which have attempted to mitigate this harsh approach, in the case of Butler Machine Tools Co Ltd v Ex-Cell-o Corporation (England) Ltd (1979)2. However, as Lord Denning's approach in the Court of Appeal was firmly rejected by the House of Lords in Gibson v Manchester City Council (1979)3, it is submitted that these dicta do not represent the current law. However, it is necessary to consider each communication that took place between the parties in this case, to see if the formalities of offer and acceptance have been fulfilled and if so, with whom the contracts exist with. ...read more.

Middle

The postal rule is reflected in the case of Adams v Lindsell7, where acceptance is deemed to have been effective at the instant, when Tom dropped the acceptance letter into the post box, provided it is properly addressed and adequately stamped. If the offeror takes the contractual risk of the letter being lost in the post, as stated in the case of Household Fire Insurance Co v Grant (1879)8. However, this depends upon the use of the postal service being reasonable, which was established by the case of Holwell Securities Ltd v Hughes (1974) 9. It is submitted that in this case, the use of the post is not reasonable, as Rob has always previously dealt with Tom by telephone. The contractual risk of the letter not arriving must therefore be deemed to fall on Tom, who therefore cannot rely upon the postal rule to create a binding contract. Additionally, even if the letter had arrived, there is also some doubt whether the terms of the letter can constitute an acceptance as the acceptance must mirror the offer as was stressed by the House of Lords in Gibson v Manchester City Council (1979)10. However, Tom was asking for payment by instalments. As such, this letter is potentially a counter-offer, capable of acceptance but not sufficient to create a binding contract. ...read more.

Conclusion

There is nothing specific by way of offer or rejection but a mere enquiry, which should have been answered.12 It is establishes that an enquiry over the terms of payment can equally be construed as an enquiry that should have been answered and not a counter-offer. 5. Sale to Sunita As the letter either has no contractual effect as acceptance was not communicated, or was a mere enquiry and not a counter-offer, it is submitted that Rob was not free to sell the car to Sunita when she made her contract on Wednesday morning. Rob knew that he had given Tom until Wednesday evening to accept his earlier offer over the car and so could not sell the car to another until Thursday. However, if Tom still wishes to purchase the car for �5,000 and can pay the money immediately, it is submitted that he can force Rob to sell the car to him. As the car is a vintage car, damages for breach of contract may not be an adequate remedy and may not even be calculable, so a court may order specific performance of the contract. Naturally, Rob would also be in breach of the implied term in his contract with Sunita, namely that he had good title to the car he was selling, as stated in the s12 of the Sale of Goods Act (1979) 17. He would also be liable for damages caused to her. WORDS: 1284 6. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Law of Contract section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Law of Contract essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Contract Law - Acceptance.

    4 star(s)

    agent and their client, whereby the paid commission if a buyer is found, and nothing if not. The House of Lords held that the owned in the case could revoke his promise at any time before the sale was completed, even after the estate agent had made extensive efforts to

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Contract Law - Offer And Acceptance

    3 star(s)

    A intention --- x objective test, as the main purpose is to safeguard B, but don't care about the risk Conduct as an Offer * Offer can be expressly or by conduct made to an individual, a group of people(specific offer -bilateral offer )

  1. Postal Acceptance Rule

    (Source: Kathryn O' Shea and Kylie Skeahan (1997) "Acceptance of offers by E-mail - How Far should the postal Acceptance Rule Extend? " QUT Law Journal, Vol 13, pp 247-262) The basic assumptions of postal acceptance rule is that * There will be substantial delay in delivery of the letter, depending on where the letter will be sent.

  2. Contract Law - offer and acceptance.

    be accepted by one the local companies through the highest tender submitted. This in turn would be followed by a bilateral contract to sell the widget machine to that particular company. In order to establish with which of the companies Astonia PLC may have a binding agreement with it is important to examine each of the tenders submitted.

  1. Contract law - Advise Sarah - The first thing to ascertain is whether the ...

    Dodds refused this offer as he had already sold the house to Mr. Alan. It was held that there was no contract between Mr. Dickinson and Mr. Dodds, since Mr. Dodds had revoked his offer, and that revocation had been communicated to Mr.

  2. Four ways in which a contract may be discharged.

    This would have been difficult and complicated without certainty of success. British Westinghouse v Underground Electric Railways [1912] AC 673. British Westinghouse supplied turbines to the railway company. They were deficient in power and uneconomic. The railway company replaced the turbines with a different make.

  1. Offer and Acceptance

    There is no contract at the moment. If he wishes to make a contract, he must wait till the aircraft is gone and then shout back his acceptance so that I can hear what he says. Not until I have his answer am I bound."

  2. Definitions of Actus reus, mens rea & strict liability

    Fagan v MPC, and Mens Rea is present at some point during its commission. * The second way is a chain or series of events as in the case of Thabo Meli v R. Transferred Malice Mens Rea can be transferred from an intended victim to an unintended one as

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work