• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Dealing with problems of offer and acceptance.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Contents 1. Introduction 2 2. Contractual effect of the advertisement 2 3. Offer by telephone by Rob 3 4. Rob's reply by letter 3 5. Sale to Sunita 4 6. Bibliography 5 1. Introduction In dealing with problems of offer and acceptance, the Courts have taken a strict approach, stating that there must be clear offer and acceptance in order to create a binding contract. As such, offers must be clear on their terms and capable of acceptance and can only be accepted on terms that mirror the offer, as established in the case of Gibson v Manchester City Council (1979) 1. There are dicta in certain cases, notably in the judgments of Lord Denning MR, which have attempted to mitigate this harsh approach, in the case of Butler Machine Tools Co Ltd v Ex-Cell-o Corporation (England) Ltd (1979)2. However, as Lord Denning's approach in the Court of Appeal was firmly rejected by the House of Lords in Gibson v Manchester City Council (1979)3, it is submitted that these dicta do not represent the current law. However, it is necessary to consider each communication that took place between the parties in this case, to see if the formalities of offer and acceptance have been fulfilled and if so, with whom the contracts exist with. ...read more.

Middle

The postal rule is reflected in the case of Adams v Lindsell7, where acceptance is deemed to have been effective at the instant, when Tom dropped the acceptance letter into the post box, provided it is properly addressed and adequately stamped. If the offeror takes the contractual risk of the letter being lost in the post, as stated in the case of Household Fire Insurance Co v Grant (1879)8. However, this depends upon the use of the postal service being reasonable, which was established by the case of Holwell Securities Ltd v Hughes (1974) 9. It is submitted that in this case, the use of the post is not reasonable, as Rob has always previously dealt with Tom by telephone. The contractual risk of the letter not arriving must therefore be deemed to fall on Tom, who therefore cannot rely upon the postal rule to create a binding contract. Additionally, even if the letter had arrived, there is also some doubt whether the terms of the letter can constitute an acceptance as the acceptance must mirror the offer as was stressed by the House of Lords in Gibson v Manchester City Council (1979)10. However, Tom was asking for payment by instalments. As such, this letter is potentially a counter-offer, capable of acceptance but not sufficient to create a binding contract. ...read more.

Conclusion

There is nothing specific by way of offer or rejection but a mere enquiry, which should have been answered.12 It is establishes that an enquiry over the terms of payment can equally be construed as an enquiry that should have been answered and not a counter-offer. 5. Sale to Sunita As the letter either has no contractual effect as acceptance was not communicated, or was a mere enquiry and not a counter-offer, it is submitted that Rob was not free to sell the car to Sunita when she made her contract on Wednesday morning. Rob knew that he had given Tom until Wednesday evening to accept his earlier offer over the car and so could not sell the car to another until Thursday. However, if Tom still wishes to purchase the car for �5,000 and can pay the money immediately, it is submitted that he can force Rob to sell the car to him. As the car is a vintage car, damages for breach of contract may not be an adequate remedy and may not even be calculable, so a court may order specific performance of the contract. Naturally, Rob would also be in breach of the implied term in his contract with Sunita, namely that he had good title to the car he was selling, as stated in the s12 of the Sale of Goods Act (1979) 17. He would also be liable for damages caused to her. WORDS: 1284 6. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Law of Contract section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Law of Contract essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Contract Law - Acceptance.

    4 star(s)

    agent and their client, whereby the paid commission if a buyer is found, and nothing if not. The House of Lords held that the owned in the case could revoke his promise at any time before the sale was completed, even after the estate agent had made extensive efforts to

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Contract Law - Offer And Acceptance

    3 star(s)

    The plaintiff immediately replied, paying the �3 administration fee. The council replied: "The corporation may be prepared to sell the house to you at the purchase price of �2,725 less 20 per cent. �2,180 (freehold)." The letter gave details about a mortgage and went on "This letter should not be regarded as a firm offer of a mortgage.

  1. Four ways in which a contract may be discharged.

    "The goods in question were ordinary articles of commerce and of no special value or interest... The judgement should be limited to damages for breach of contract." (per McCardie J) Behnke v Bede Shipping Co [1927] 1 KB 649. This case concerned the sale of a ship.

  2. Postal Acceptance Rule

    In support of the postal acceptance rule, the courts maintained that if the general rule relating to the acceptance of an offer is applied to an acceptance sent by post, then an offeree would never truly be certain of the existence of a binding contract until the offeror communicated the fact of receipt of the letter of acceptance.

  1. Contract law - Advise Sarah - The first thing to ascertain is whether the ...

    that the swimming prize had been cancelled, acceptance had not begun, which would therefore enable the offeror, Mick, to withdraw his offer. Sarah may however have a claim to the prize if she had already started her swim, in which case the last attempt to revoke the offer by megaphone

  2. Contract Law - offer and acceptance.

    The plaintiff's offered $2175000 for them while the other party offered to pay $2100000 or if that was not the highest tender then $10100 in excess of any other bid. The House of Lords ruled that the other party's second bid was invalid, and that the defendants undertaking, meant their

  1. Undue influence in the case of Barclays Bank v. O''Brian [1994] Lord Browne-Wilkinson was ...

    Chitty (para 501) has the view that damages should be recoverable, since otherwise a party who has lost the right to avoid the contract is left without a remedy for a clearly unlawful act We are dealing with presumed undue influence.

  2. LAW OF CONTRACT. LAW 103. THE CONTENT OF THE CONTRACT.

    "Waiting to see" the effect of the breach may provide a better solution but it removes certainty. In The Mihailis Angelos [1970] 3 All ER 125 a clause in a charterparty for a voyage from Vietnam to Hamburg stated that the vessel was "expected ready to load under this charter party about 1 July 1965.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work