• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Demonstrate your understanding of both the UK civil and criminal court systems and their hierarchical structures.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Demonstrate your understanding of both the UK civil and criminal court systems and their hierarchical structures. The divide between criminal and civil law can be identified by the factions represented in court. In a civil court, i.e. magistrates, county or the high court, the two participants are private individuals. In a criminal court, i.e. magistrates, crown or the high court, one of the opposing parties is always the state; theoretically the Queen (represented by the Crown Prosecution Service), the other being the defendant; an individual person. An important similarity between criminal law and civil law to consider is that they both have a common purpose, most notably to control people's behaviour by setting limits on what acts are permissible in this country. Both have their own remedies. Civil law deals with individual wrongs. Criminal law deals with wrongs against society. In practice the difference between a civil and a criminal matter can be derived from who brings the case. A criminal matter is brought by the government, whereas a civil matter is brought by another person (or some private entity). The majority of private law is comprised of civil cases, mainly concerning a claimant and a defendant. Such cases arise when one individual has a grievance against another for personal harm done be it physical or mental, and therefore seeks compensation. An action has to be taken were the courts will settle the differences. ...read more.

Middle

In a magistrates court lay magistrates hear most cases normally in groups of three. Lay magistrates are part time, unpaid and do not need a legal qualification, however they are assisted by a legally qualified clerk who may advise if requested. Some, but very few cases may be heard by District |Judges. District judges are legally qualified, full time and paid, they sit alone and hear the longer and more difficult cases. Only summary offences such as motor offences and minor assaults are dealt with in the magistrate's court. Apart from the exception of triable either way offences which, can then be dealt with in either two courts of trial. The majority of criminal business is dealt with by magistrates and, despite ideology and triviality, they deal with serious cases. There is also a Youth Court within the Magistrates Court which deals with the offences of minors where a detention, training order or a custodial sentence can be issued. The Magistrates court is fundamentally a criminal court but also deals with matters falling under The Domestic Proceedings and Magistrates Court Act 1978, i.e. granting personal licenses and small civil debts. In a civil court the parties are heard by a single judge who decides, based on the amount of compensation sought and the nature of the case, which track to direct the claim. The small claims track hears cases seeking no more than five thousand pounds and personal injury claims of up to one thousand pounds. ...read more.

Conclusion

Complex cases may 'leapfrog' to the Supreme Court from the High Court. Criminal cases can be heard in the High Court (Administrative Court of the QBD) where cases are heard 'by way of case stated' by High Court Judges. The Court of Appeal may hear appeals from the crown court from both the defendant and the prosecution. Decisions in The Court of Appeal are made by 'Lord Justices of Appeal'. The House of Lords hears appeals from the Criminal Division or from the administrative court of the QBD via a 'leapfrog' procedure. Such appeals are heard on points of the law. The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council grants appeals if there has been a considerable injustice served or if it is deemed that the accused has been denied a fair trial. The European Court of Justice may be consulted to give rulings on matters of European law. The European Court of Human Rights hears cases concerning breaches of the European Convention of Human Rights, which was signed in 1951 by a number of European countries, including the UK. In conclusion; criminal law primarily deals with the rehabilitation or punishment for wrongs, and ends in fines or imprisonment. Civil law is about righting a wrong and has the primary purpose of compensation. Lord Irvine distinguishes from the two in the following quote: "The criminal justice system is there to help protect us from crime, and to ensure that criminals are punished. The civil justice system is there to help people dispute their wrongs fairly and peacefully. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Machinery of Justice section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Machinery of Justice essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) is the name given to the process where parties in ...

    5 star(s)

    Some complex cases involve lengthy pre-action stages In factually complex cases, the pre-action stage can be very time consuming and be extremely costly, there is a potential irrecoverability of elements of pre-action costs if there are claims that are not subsequently pursued in the proceedings.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Non-fatal Offences?

    3 star(s)

    CMV.Clarkson and HM.Keating argue that 'both section 18 and 20 cover the same harm' and ask the question of 'can the difference in their maximum penalties be justified exclusively in terms of their differing mens rea requirements?' one believes that, it does justify the requirements but to a certain extent.

  1. Free essay

    Critically discuss whether the criminal courts of England and Wales require substantial reform. Firstly ...

    This helped them understand the system better and work more efficiently and quickly. What I am motivating at is that changes in the criminal justice system are regular, and so they should be. Magistrates, some 30,000 or more, received no training of any kind. That after all was their purpose.

  2. Evaluate the impact that government policies on war and terrorism have on UK law, ...

    In order to ensure the UK's safety and bolster national defence, Parliament has passed some wide-ranging legislation that has had a significant impact on the powers available to the police and security services, such as the Anti-Terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001; the Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005; the Terrorism Act 2006; and the Counter-Terrorism Act 2008.

  1. Why do young people join gangs and other subcultures? How does a criminal sub ...

    * A sense of belonging. * Status. * New and exciting experiences. * Access to drugs and alcohol. * Monetary opportunities through illegal markets. In most cases, youths believe that the gang will provide them with things they could not otherwise obtain. Many gang members report that they joined gangs because of the protection they offered.

  2. As the juvenile courts converge procedurally and substantively with the adult criminal courts, does ...

    in general (44.4), and nearly triple the rate for juveniles of other races (40.4) (p. 42). Is the problem that black people are black, or are there factors that weigh heavily in favor of criminal activity among black inner-city youth that do not play a significant role in other communities?

  1. Explain the ranges of sentences available to the judge or magistrate.

    The Criminal Justice Act 1991 followed a White Paper, which proclaimed that the aim was "better justice through a more consistent approach to sentencing, so that convicted criminals get their 'just deserts.'" Just desert theorists have tended to follow the ideas of Kant, that people deserve to be punished if they have broken the law.

  2. BTEC A Level Law P1 - explain the use of the courts in the ...

    It covers offences such as road traffic and assault. The maximum sentences this court can give are 6 months and or fine someone £5k. Triable either way (guilty or not guilty) offences may be also heard here or only first instance court cases are heard here. Magistrate’s court is bound by all higher court decisions.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work