• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Describe How The System Of Trial By Jury Operates

Extracts from this document...


Describe How The System Of Trial By Jury Operates A jury system consists of seven to twelve people, depending on the case and the court appearing in. Twelve jurors are used in Crown Court criminal cases for indictable offences. The Queens Bench Division of High Court where the cases involved are civil cases also have twelve jurors. These are cases involving libel and slander, fraud, malicious prosecution and false imprisonment. In civil cases at a County Court, eight jurors are present, although this is rare. Seven to eleven jurors are present at suspicious death cases at the Coroners Court. Specialist juries have been used within complex cases, usually fraud, as sometimes the cases can be complicated The selection process has been that since 1972, names were taken at random from the electoral role. The Juries Act, 1974 section 1, states that those who qualify for jury service are anyone aged between eighteen and seventy who have been a resident within the United Kingdom for five years since the age of thirteen. This should ensure that the selection is completely random, although within Birmingham, only one percent of jurors were of Asian or West Indian origin when almost thirteen percent make up the population. ...read more.


As members of the jury must swear to secrecy once returning from the jury room after deliberating the verdict, this ensures that no one is penalised for the final verdict. Trial by jury should, in general, eliminates any individual biased decisions, such as racism against ethnic minorities and the opposite gender. Many jurors are aware that they are there to make justice, and so do not let any racist issues over rule their judgement of the evidence. They are also aware that justice must be seen to have been done for people to keep believe in the jury system. The system of trial by jury is very traditional, and is seen by society to be a fair trial. Many people believe that they have a right to be tried by ones peers within a court of justice. There are also many disadvantages to a trial by jury, perhaps more than the number of advantages. Many people within the United Kingdom are uneducated or unintelligent, and so not competent to be on a jury, but are however on the electoral role, so it can be a lengthy process having to explain details, especially in complex cases such as fraud cases as the nature of such cases is highly complicated. ...read more.


It would however mean that all of the advantages of using a jury would be lost, including the randomness of selection and the varied views of society. There may also be problems in recruiting enough judges for the job. It would lessen the risk of having a few strong0-minded individuals Within Northern Ireland, no juries are used, but a system called the Diplock Court. As the community is divided into two by religion, the Protestants and the Catholics, it would be unjust to have, for example, a catholic on trial against a jury of predominantly Protestants, as this would cause great conflict and unjust verdicts not based on the evidence, but on the defendant's religion. Although there are many disadvantages to the modern system of a trial by jury, it is believed to be a fair judgement by the general public, and although could use a few improvements, it is probably the most well structured and reliable system when compared to the new ideas that are being suggested. It has been seen to work for justice for centuries, and has many strong advantages and is preferred by many over replacing the jury. 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Machinery of Justice section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Machinery of Justice essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    ‘Trial by jury is outdated, expensive and ineffective in ensuring justice’ Analyse arguments for ...

    4 star(s)

    The symbolic function of the jury is key to legitimising the criminal justice system - it keeps the state from having an absolute power over the actions of its citizens and ensures a confidence in the adversarial system of justice (Sanders, 1997:1051, Sanders & Young, 2000:559).

  2. What justification was there for Socrates' trial, verdict and death sentence?

    Many of the jurors had seen these plays in their youth, and grew up with the feelings that Socrates was a 'bad character.' This is not just, because it meant that the jury were not willing to fully accept both sides of the argument, as they did not favour Socrates.

  1. The jury system or right to a trial by jury is often described as ...

    Similarly a person who at any time in the last ten years served any part of a sentence of imprisonment or a sentence of detention, or had passed on him a suspended sentence of imprisonment or a suspended order for detention or has received a community order, community rehabilitation order,

  2. ' Is the jury the "...lamp that shows freedom lives"?

    This has particular resonance when one considers the background of magistrates, which continues to be largely white and middle-class. This point however valid is for some, a bitter pill to swallow. Jury selection is seen to be biased and unrepresentative of the whole community.

  1. I will look at different black theologies and different theories of justice, and attempt ...

    been used as an opium of the masses: "[Marx] was correct in identifying the intention of oppressors. They promote religion because it can be an effective tool for enslavement."11 Furthermore he affirms that black liberation theology is in clear support of the poor: "All proponents of liberation theology contend that the masses are not poor by accident.

  2. Describe trial by jury within the English legal system. How effective is trial by ...

    This also includes anyone who has performed jury service in the previous two years, or has been excused for life by a judge. Other people may be excused on request. These include students sitting exams, mums with young children, people who have certain disabilities (blind and deaf)

  1. The Defence of the Corporate Veil - Parent Companies Beware!

    its shareholders unless there is clear evidence to show that the company was in fact acting as an agent in a particular transaction or series of transactions.

  2. Outline the rights of a defendant to legal representation and bail

    In the case of Cabballero v UK (2000), Caballero challenged s.25 by going to the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR). The ECHR said s.25 was a breach of the right to a fair trial. So s.56 of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 amended s.25 and said that bail

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work