• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Describe the different aims of sentencing.

Extracts from this document...


Iain Byrom AS Law- Machinery of Justice Describe the different aims of sentencing. There are a number of reasons why a society punishes offenders. These include, among others, to discourage the offender from committing further crimes (individual deterrence), to help the offender, so that he or she won't offend again (rehabilitation), to prevent the offender from committing further crimes through imprisonment (incapacitation) and to show society's disapproval of the crime (denunciation). Retribution is to punish on the premise that it is a payback for the offence (Retribution carries with it the notion of "Do the crime, do the time") Reparation is aimed at compensating the victim of the crime usually by ordering the offender to pay order to make restitution. ...read more.


The value of general deterrence is even more doubtful as potential offenders are rarely deterred by severe penalties passed on others. The main aim of rehabilitation is to reform the offender and rehabilitate him into society. It is a forward-looking aim, with the hopes that the offender's behaviour will be altered by the penalty imposed, so that he or she will not re-offend in the future (it aims to reduce crime this way) One aspect of rehabilitation is the use of individualised sentences - penalties aimed at the individual needs of the offender. This is in direct contrast to the concept of set sentences seen in the aim of retribution. ...read more.


drink driving is now viewed as unacceptable behaviour. This is largely because of the changes in the law and the increasingly severe sentences that are imposed. Retribution is based on the idea of punishment because the offender deserves punishment for his acts. It does not seek to reduce crime or alter the offender's future behaviour. Retribution is concerned only with the crime . The principle of retribution can be seen as the guidelines laid down by the Court of Appeals as the 'correct' punishment for certain offences. E.g. rape offences should be given a custodial sentence of at least 5 years. Whenever a person pleads guilty, or is found guilty of an offence, the role of the court is to decide what sentence should be imposed on the offender. Their decisions on sentences usually satisfy a number of the aims described above. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Machinery of Justice section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Machinery of Justice essays

  1. Critically evaluate the aims and consequences of sentencing and show how the laws regarding ...

    for the courts to decide that the offender would be better to serve their time with a hospital order rather than a custodial order. Another issue which needs to be raised is whether or not punishment should deter the offender and society at large.

  2. Notes on Sentencing in British courts

    * Panel have power to advise guidelines be made or revised for particular offence. 3 Types of Sentences Four main types of sentence available to courts: 1. Custodial 2. Community 3. Fines 4. Discharge Have additional such as compensation orders and confiscation of driving licence.

  1. A critical evaluation of labelling theory.

    When in prison the new offender is forced to associate with 'hardened' criminals, which can be a bad influence, also when the individual is released from prison they will have lost their previous job and will probably find it very difficult to find another as few employers wish to take on 'ex-cons' (another negative label).

  2. The Canadian Justice system towards aboriginal offenders

    The technicalities of the sentencing circle serve to reinforce its adherence to the values of restorative justice. The ideal result of this procedure is "a sentence shaped by all participants and endorsed by the community that will be participating in its implementation".19 Justice Stewart, in his judgment in R. v.

  1. Custodial Sentences.

    During this period the offender must keep in regular contact with the probation officer and must lead an 'industrious and honest' life. The main aim of a community rehabilitation order is to rehabilitate the offender. * Community Punishment Orders This requires the offender to work for between 40 and 240 hours on a suitable project organised by the probation service.

  2. Principles on which sentencing decisions are based

    The policy underlying sentencing was subject to a major view in the late 1980's culminating in the government White Paper 'Crime, Justice and Protecting the Public'. The proposals in the White Paper were then turned into law by the Criminal Justice Act (CJA)

  1. Expert Testimony and Its Value In the Justice System

    run is the minimum level to which concurrent evidence should be applied. Conclusion It is obvious that the laws regarding expert testimony in the United Kingdom are in desperate need of reform. This is clearly highlighted by the high profile miscarriages of justice which have happened over the past decade

  2. Arguing in Favour of the Death Penalty

    The death penalty is not handed out easily and the prosecutors do not just decide that they will seek it. Most states have certain guidelines that must be met before the death penalty can be considered. For instance in Colorado there has to be statutory aggravators, these aggravators can consist

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work