• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Describe the main features of the reforms passed by the government in the 19th century that affected prisons

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Describe the main features of the reforms passed by the government in the 19th century that affected prisons As we can see from question one prisons needed serious reform. This is because the purpose of prison was to hold people until they were hung or transported therefore no one cared about reforming them. So the purpose of prisons has to change for the conditions to change. This is because if the purpose changes from holding prisoners till death to holding prisoners until there sentence is up people will put more effort into reforming them so the conditions will get better and the way to do this is for people like Elizabeth Fry to implement the changes needed. One reformer was John Howard he was a man that came up with ideas to reform. Howard recommended separation on the grounds that it will help stop the spread of diseases such as typhus and smallpox. He also said that each room was to be small and the prisoners were to be separated so that they could reflect on their crimes and hopefully repent and turn to God. ...read more.

Middle

She wanted the opportunity while women and children were in prison to try to teach them. She also wanted to try to bring the faith of Christianity into their lives in order to try to reform and turn them into better people. She also believed in segregation and women's rights along with female jailors. She wanted this because she wanted to stop disease and corruption; female jailors were also suggested because she wanted the women to have privacy. I have discussed what Elizabeth Fry wanted but she wanted all these changes because she believed that the way to change these people in to better members of society was to turn them to God. She believed that prayer was the way to reform prisoners. As a result of these three reformers the government had to take note and do something. The thing that the government did was they introduced news laws or acts. There were four laws that each developed upon each other to help reform the appalling prison conditions. The first act was 'Pophams act of 1774', which said that prisoners were to be kept clean and a doctor was to visit the prison regally. ...read more.

Conclusion

The next act was the 'Prison act passed in 1835'. This act was an encouragement for all prisons because the government offered grants for the upkeep of prisons and they appointed inspectors of prisons to see that all laws were obeyed to the letter. This was the better law as it appointed people to reinforce laws and it also provided an incentive to prisons to reform. The final act was that called 'The act of 1877'. This act put the home-secretary in direct control of prisons. This meant with one person in control they will all be of the same standard. This will ensure that all prisons are reformed and turned into better places. To conclude prisons needed to reform prisons because ultimately the purpose of prisons was changing with help from reformers such as John Howard. The purpose was changing from detaining prisoners till death to trying to reform prisoners into better members of society. The purpose was changing because there were two hundred fewer offences that you could be hung for and as transportation ended in 1852 an alternative form of punishment had to be found. The alternative punishment was prison of which now prisoners were sent to prison to be rehabilitated. Mathew Atkinson 10B History Coursework -1- ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sources of Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sources of Law essays

  1. How effective were the Liberal Reforms between 1906 and 1914?

    The fact that there were huge exclusions to Liberal legislation adds to the idea that Liberal rule was not very successful with dealing with poverty and need. In conclusion, there are two views on how successful the Liberals were in dealing with the problems of poverty and need.

  2. How successful were the Liberal Reforms of 1906-1914?

    The Liberals also extended the Workman's Compensation Act of 1897 in its scope to cover some six million workers from poverty due to injury at work. However, many industries were not covered at all, and this greatly contributed to the growth of poverty.

  1. Our country's goodPlotAct one scene one-In scene one we see that there are some ...

    Then liz morden comes in and a fight occurs between herself and Dabby. The fight is interrupted by Ketch and we see the hate the convicts have towards him, we learn that this is because he is the hangman and the convicts feel like he has betrayed them by taking the job instead of being hung himself.

  2. Liberal reform 1906-1914

    Poverty was high as they had no successful financial backing from the government and could not make enough money working. The Old Age Pensions Act was introduced in 1908. The Act provided for pensions of 5s per week to be paid to those aged 70 or over who had annual incomes of £21 or less.

  1. Indigenous peoples, almost without exception, have been dispossessed and disregarded by those who 'discovered' ...

    A goal of the Human Rights Committee, of the United Nations, and of the international community generally. After all, the fundamental corollary of a right is an obligation, and while a State may be under moral, social or political obligations with respect to a valid self-determination claim such as is

  2. Judicial Reform and Bill of Rights.

    Another solution to the high costs could be to remove barristers' monopoly in court, so barristers would lose their monopoly on representing clients in the higher courts. Instead, salaried lawyers working for law firms and for the Crown Prosecution Service would be able to represent clients in court.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work