• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Describe trial by jury within the English legal system. How effective is trial by jury? Consider any alternatives and suggest improvements.

Extracts from this document...


Describe trial by jury within the English legal system. How effective is trial by jury? Consider any alternatives and suggest improvements. In our English Legal system, the jury has been a long part of establishment for centuries. It consists of 12 lay people, who represent a cross section of the public. They listen to both sides of a case and decide a verdict, based on the facts presented to them. Some people think that trial by jury is fairer than a judge because the jury is independent and therefore could not be influenced by the government. In the Crown Court criminal cases, twelve jurors are used for indictable offences. The Queens Bench Division of High Court deals with civil cases and also contains twelve jurors. These are cases involving libel and slander, fraud, malicious prosecution and false imprisonment. In civil cases at a County Court, eight jurors are present although this is rare. Seven to eleven jurors are present at suspicious death cases at the Coroners Court. The most important is the Crown Court where juries decide whether the defendant is guilty or not guilty. In the Juries Act 1974, jurors have to be selected at random from the electoral register. The Juries Act 1974 section 1, states to qualify for jury service a person must be aged between 18 and 70 (Criminal Justice Act 1988, section 119), registered as a ...read more.


If they cannot reach a unanimous verdict the judge may recall the jurors after at least 2 hours having elapsed. The Juries Act 1974, section seventeen allows for majority verdict to be used, normally eleven to one, ten to two, ten to one or nine to one. In open court the foreman must state the number of jurors agreeing with the verdict and the numbers disagreeing with the verdict. Only 6 - 7 % of jury decisions are by majority verdict. Juries cannot fall below 9 in number. At each Crown Court, there is an official who is responsible for summoning enough jurors to try each case that will be heard in a 2-week period. If a trial may be exceptionally long, or difficult potential jurors are asked if they will be able to serve to complete the trial (e.g. as in the Soham case (2003)). The problem in civil cases, especially libel cases are that they can be very long. R v Wright in 1995 lasted 17 months. If the jury fails entirely to agree, a verdict is not entered at all and retrial is ordered (If 2 consecutive juries fail to agree, the defendant is discharged). If the jury decide upon a verdict of not guilty, the defendant is discharged. ...read more.


(especially in fraud cases with assessors who had expertise in accounts and business management) . In New Zealand, defendants can choose not to be tried by a jury, but instead by a judge sitting on his own. In N. Ireland trial is by a single judge due to special problems of threats and jury nobbling that existed between sectarian parties. In some countries, a panel of 3 or 5 judges sitting all together hears cases. This allows for a balance of views, instead of a verdict by a single person. There are not enough judges in our English system to implement this and it would be expensive. I think that trial by jury in the English Legal system is very effective, however suggestions for improvement could be a system that operates in Scotland. They have a 'judicial examination ', which covers continuous judicial control of pre-trial preparation compared with the English system, which emphasizes the trial as the critical period of determining guilt or innocence. The Runciman commission suggested that the Contempt of Court Act 1981 should be amended to allow research into the working of juries. On the other hand people may be less willing to serve on juries if they knew that their discussions could be made public. ?? ?? ?? ?? Sabrina 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Machinery of Justice section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Machinery of Justice essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    ‘Trial by jury is outdated, expensive and ineffective in ensuring justice’ Analyse arguments for ...

    4 star(s)

    People have the entitlement to request excusal on such grounds as a holiday which was pre-booked, that they know people involved in the case - perhaps causing prejudice - or for reasons which may cause personal hardship such as difficulties with childcare or wage-loss (Sanders & Young, 2000:559).

  2. What justification was there for Socrates' trial, verdict and death sentence?

    Therefore, there was prejudice against this 'God,' and Socrates could have been despised for following it, and basing his life mission and philosophising on its prophesy. I believe this is not fair, because the Athenians, probably including the jury members, remembered old times and were bias towards this charge.

  1. ' Is the jury the "...lamp that shows freedom lives"?

    Not all of these verdicts were perverse, since in some cases the judges allowed defenses based on international law related to nuclear weapons or of lawful excuse under the provisions of the Criminal Damage Act, to be put and left to the jury to decide on the merits.

  2. A critical evaluation of labelling theory.

    When in prison the new offender is forced to associate with 'hardened' criminals, which can be a bad influence, also when the individual is released from prison they will have lost their previous job and will probably find it very difficult to find another as few employers wish to take on 'ex-cons' (another negative label).

  1. Jury decision making: Discuss the effectiveness of jury decision making.

    both had the same results. Another study by Stewart (1980) found that white American university students were more likely to say that a black man was guilty of committing a crime than a white man even though the crimes were the same, leading us to believe that black defendants would receive harsher sentencing.

  2. Trial by jury is more than an instrument of justice and more than one ...

    Besides that, in some cases like R v Young and R v Karakaya, where both of this cases concern with the jury using unreliable means of coming to a decision.

  1. Conditional Fee Arrangements and Legal Aid

    Unlike legal aid in civil cases, state-funded criminal defence will continue to be given on a demand-led basis; there will be no set budget and all cases that fit the merits criteria will be funded.

  2. Explain the ranges of sentences available to the judge or magistrate.

    Remorse or contritition 5. Voluntary reparation- although an offender should not be allowed to 'buy off' his likely sentence 6. Physical or mental disabilities 7. Peer group pressure. Previous convictions As long as the Courts deem the offenders previous convictions to be relevant, they will be taken into account along with the offender's response to them.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work