• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss the Difference Between Law and Morality.

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐LAW AND MORALS WHAT ARE LAWS AND MORALS Morality is linked to the beliefs, values and principles we hold about how we should behaviour in society. The word ?morality? itself is comes from the Latin word ?moralitas? and it covers areas such as sex before marriage, abortion, contraception and differences in sexual preferences. Morals often involve issues of ?right? and ?wrong?, however, sometimes, one person?s wrong is another?s right. A philosopher, John Mackie, argues that ?there are no objective values?, suggesting that morals are subjective in nature as they are created by human beings. Meanwhile, Laws are rules that are enforced by the Government, the Parliament, and other public bodies. They are aimed to control and direct human behaviour and they deal with many issues such as anti-social behaviours. THE BASIC NATURE OF MORALS Morals are change over time and differ from culture to culture, and from individual to individual, although nearly all the cultures are against extreme behaviours such as murder and rape. Morality often finds its roots in religion. For example, the bible provides a moral code for Christian communities and it teaches Christians what is acceptable and what is not. Meanwhile, the Koran offers a different moral code for Muslim communities and it also teaches Muslims what is and what is not acceptable. ...read more.


3. Breaches of moral rules are not usually subject to any formal adjudication, while breaches of law will be ruled on by a formal legal system, usually in the courts. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LAW AND MORALS Both Law and morality are said to be normative. This means that they both dictate the way in which people are expected to behave. Moral value can clearly have an influence on how laws are made, and some people would argue that the criminal law represents a common moral position. The moral standards of a community are recognised as having a significant influence on the development of law, but in complex societies, morality and law are never likely to be coextensive. Major breaches of a moral code, such as murder and robbery, will also be against the law, but in other matters, there may not be any meaningful consensus. The law may appear to be based on moral values, but not all laws will be accepted by everyone. The obvious example is the Abortion Act 1967. The act was introduced to ensure that women were having abortions in proper clinical conditions. At the time of the act, there was much publicity regarding horrific injuries and even death caused by back-street abortions. However, groups such as LIFE and the Association of Lawyers for the Defence of the Unborn Child contest the morality of abortion. ...read more.


English law continues to take this line in some cases. A strong example was the case of R v Brown (gay men took part in sad-masochistic acts. Ds were found guilty even though they gave their consent). Even then, the contradictions in law can be shown when the case is compared with R v Wilson (branding). The court of appeal accepted that a man branding his wife?s buttocks with his initials could not lead to a criminal conviction because it was consensual on the wife?s part and was entirely private matter in which the law should not intervene. THE LEGAL ENFORCEMENT OF MORALS In criminal law, morals figure very largely in the whole area of sexual offences. An example is the use of strict liability in some of the offences in the Sexual Offences Act 2003. This was illustrated in R v G (2008). A 15 year old boy had sex with a 12 year old girl because he believed she was 15. The homicide offences and the non-fatal offences also have their roots in the moral view that it is wrong to kill or physically to harm another person with no justification. Even within these offences, the use of partial defences of murder can be seen as having a base in morality. For example, it would be wrong to convict a person of murder whose reasoning was impaired by an abnormality of the mental functioning, as with diminished responsibility under section 2 of the Homicide Act 1957. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sources of Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sources of Law essays

  1. Explain the distinction between the law and morals and consider the importance of the ...

    rough and undisciplined horseplay is a defence; and, even if there is no consent, genuine belief that it was present, would be a defence. This seems therefore like the courts are condoning the act of bullying, throwing two boys who did not want to be thrown in the air who

  2. The Land Registration Act 2002 heralds major changes to the law and procedures regarding ...

    In the last case his judgment for possession becomes unenforceable after two years. So here, compare to the old law, we can see that the LRA 2002 seems to be balanced the rights of the true owner and the squatter.

  1. Critically evaluate the partial defence of Provocation.

    In such cases provocation of the defendant must be excessive in comparison to with the defendant's original act. The Defendant in Edwards v R (1973) tried to blackmail his victim, who attacked him with a knife. A fight ensued during which Edwards grabbed the knife and fatally stabbed his attacker.

  2. Examine the relationship between law and morals and consider whether the law should support ...

    The local court's decision to disconnect Schiavo from life support was carried out on March 18, 2005, and Schiavo died at a Pinellas Park hospice on March 31. The relationship between law and morality is not an easy one. The legal system accepts a certain amount of morality, because if

  1. Unmarried fathers and their children - has the law got it right?

    Differential treatment for children dependant on their parent's marital status is contrary to the anti- discrimination principle of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. Article.2 States: "Parties are required to take all appropriate measures to ensure that the child is protected against all forms of discrimination.

  2. Discuss the nature of legal and moral issues. Consider whether the law does and ...

    that demonstrated how the law can impose certain moral values. Here, six middle-aged homosexual men were prosecuted for sadomasochistic practice and Lord Templeman stated "society is entitled to protect against cult of violence". There have also been campaigns to change public morality, which is reflected through law reform, an example being the topic of fox hunting.

  1. Should people have a right to privacy?

    This creates problems because it is extremely difficult to weight the separate rights. Although a balance needs to be made, ?successive governments have favoured the pendulum tilting more towards freedom of speech that privacy? 18(Katy Andrews, 2011) which as been effected by Section 12 of the 1998 Act, ?which contains

  2. The Nature of Law in Society

    dismissed from their employment, they may file a lawsuit asking the courts to decide who is right. In order to win the case the burden of proof is on the claimant. He must meet the standard of proof, which is to establish on the balance of probabilities that the defendant

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work