• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss the Difference Between Law and Morality.

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐LAW AND MORALS WHAT ARE LAWS AND MORALS Morality is linked to the beliefs, values and principles we hold about how we should behaviour in society. The word ?morality? itself is comes from the Latin word ?moralitas? and it covers areas such as sex before marriage, abortion, contraception and differences in sexual preferences. Morals often involve issues of ?right? and ?wrong?, however, sometimes, one person?s wrong is another?s right. A philosopher, John Mackie, argues that ?there are no objective values?, suggesting that morals are subjective in nature as they are created by human beings. Meanwhile, Laws are rules that are enforced by the Government, the Parliament, and other public bodies. They are aimed to control and direct human behaviour and they deal with many issues such as anti-social behaviours. THE BASIC NATURE OF MORALS Morals are change over time and differ from culture to culture, and from individual to individual, although nearly all the cultures are against extreme behaviours such as murder and rape. Morality often finds its roots in religion. For example, the bible provides a moral code for Christian communities and it teaches Christians what is acceptable and what is not. Meanwhile, the Koran offers a different moral code for Muslim communities and it also teaches Muslims what is and what is not acceptable. ...read more.


3. Breaches of moral rules are not usually subject to any formal adjudication, while breaches of law will be ruled on by a formal legal system, usually in the courts. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LAW AND MORALS Both Law and morality are said to be normative. This means that they both dictate the way in which people are expected to behave. Moral value can clearly have an influence on how laws are made, and some people would argue that the criminal law represents a common moral position. The moral standards of a community are recognised as having a significant influence on the development of law, but in complex societies, morality and law are never likely to be coextensive. Major breaches of a moral code, such as murder and robbery, will also be against the law, but in other matters, there may not be any meaningful consensus. The law may appear to be based on moral values, but not all laws will be accepted by everyone. The obvious example is the Abortion Act 1967. The act was introduced to ensure that women were having abortions in proper clinical conditions. At the time of the act, there was much publicity regarding horrific injuries and even death caused by back-street abortions. However, groups such as LIFE and the Association of Lawyers for the Defence of the Unborn Child contest the morality of abortion. ...read more.


English law continues to take this line in some cases. A strong example was the case of R v Brown (gay men took part in sad-masochistic acts. Ds were found guilty even though they gave their consent). Even then, the contradictions in law can be shown when the case is compared with R v Wilson (branding). The court of appeal accepted that a man branding his wife?s buttocks with his initials could not lead to a criminal conviction because it was consensual on the wife?s part and was entirely private matter in which the law should not intervene. THE LEGAL ENFORCEMENT OF MORALS In criminal law, morals figure very largely in the whole area of sexual offences. An example is the use of strict liability in some of the offences in the Sexual Offences Act 2003. This was illustrated in R v G (2008). A 15 year old boy had sex with a 12 year old girl because he believed she was 15. The homicide offences and the non-fatal offences also have their roots in the moral view that it is wrong to kill or physically to harm another person with no justification. Even within these offences, the use of partial defences of murder can be seen as having a base in morality. For example, it would be wrong to convict a person of murder whose reasoning was impaired by an abnormality of the mental functioning, as with diminished responsibility under section 2 of the Homicide Act 1957. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sources of Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sources of Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Examine the debate as to whether the law should reflect moral values, and discuss ...

    3 star(s)

    Before drink driving was permitted in society, as well as the law. However, recently drink driving has been banned in accordance with the law. This then created social stigma amongst the society. Due to the drink driving and drug use, Oliver Crona argued that it is the law that creates the morality, rather than morality creating the law.

  2. Examine the relationship between law and morals and consider whether the law should support ...

    law is not essentially moral there is no easy explanation of the obligation to obey. But the two are not the same: there are some legal rules that are not moral rules, and vice versa. Laws as mentioned before are made by some formal institutions such as parliament , whilst

  1. Unmarried fathers and their children - has the law got it right?

    their children.20 This maybe so in some instances, but on the other side of the equation married fathers may be irresponsible an uncaring but are not denied their legal rights. Due to the substantial increase in the number of children born to unmarried parents over the last 25 years, there

  2. The Land Registration Act 2002 heralds major changes to the law and procedures regarding ...

    It was really hard to see the true owner will succeed in recovering his own land though he was already done everything to prevent to time running. Based on the old law, the squatters will only can take over the land if the true owner did not realized and take any positive step to stop his land from adversely possess.

  1. "The key provisions of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 are inconsistent, incoherent and unfair." ...

    are also introduced. All these new or revised provisions are consistent with other legislation to protect children and the vulnerable and recognise advances in drug culture etc. (the growing use of rhohypnol, for example), and also close loopholes in the original law. This is both perfectly logical and desirable.

  2. "The dichotomy between employee and self-employed is being eroded in employment law, so much ...

    The Court of Appeal held that Lane was in fact an employee of the company. The court apparently felt that, although there was evidence to the contrary, the deciding factor was the question: 'whose business was it?' With regard to the overall project being undertaken, the answer must be that it was the company's not Lane's.

  1. delegation law

    An example of when Orders in Council could have been used is during the bombing of the World Trade Centre in September 2001, if the speculations that the Houses of Parliament was next to be attacked came true, then orders in council would have been the last resort.

  2. The Nature of Law in Society

    that the defendant is presumed to be innocent until the prosecution has proved beyond reasonable doubt that he is guilty for the alleged offence. The burden of proof is then on the prosecution and the standard of proof must be beyond reasonable doubt before the court can decide weather the defendent is guilt or not guilty for the crime.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work