• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss the effect U.K membership of the E.U has had on English law.

Extracts from this document...


Discuss the effect U.K membership of the E.U has had on English law. We have already seen that Britain's entry into the European Treaty's has invoked huge reform. (British) Parliament must now legislate in conjunction with EU law, Acts and Laws already in existence must be interpreted to conform to EU Law and the State has to ensure that all EU law is transposed and implemented accurately. This puts a huge strain on the Courts whilst ruling, thus making a mockery of Precedent as any case incorporating EU legislation can only be considered using the purposive approach, in order that EU directive can be met. So then, has Britain reserved its sovereignty as promised? As a result of joining the EU English law has seen the introduction of EU primary legislation i.e. treaties, e.g. the treaty of Rome. It has also signalled the introduction of secondary legislation, which includes regulations, directives, decisions and recommendations and opinions. The introduction of treaties and directives etc has prompted an increase in the force and quantity of human rights law in England, but some say for the cost of parliamentary sovereignty in the UK. This has lead many to believe in the so-called 'Eurocrats' trying to govern the whole of Europe without any consultation of it's member states. EU secondary legislation has many different levels, which allows for the correct weight to be applied to each 'Act' for use in the EU. ...read more.


Failure on behalf of the Member State to incorporate a Directive within the allotted time scale meant that a claim could proceed against the Italian Government for compensation, obscuring the distinction between horizontal and vertical effect. But the cost of challenge is great, tying up lengthy periods of Court time and vast sums of money. These rights are not always maintained, the UK, for example, refers fewer cases than the other member states to the European Court of Justice since the lower Courts are allowed to exercise discretion on referral. The EU giveth, the Government taketh away. It can be thought that the increased introduction of direct effect is a good thing as it allows for more injustices to be rectified, or not caused at all. Direct effect will also have repercussions upon English judges as they may feel that their rulings are more vulnerable to being challenged by the EU. UK supremacy was confronted by the EU in the case of Factortame (R v Secretary of State for Transport, ex parte Factortame (No. 3) [1996]) (1991) in which the EU directly overruled the UK in a fishing quotas dispute. With the joining of the EU some think that England should have secured it's own supremacy. They would say that England should be able to rule and govern it's in any way it pleases, and that the de-centralisation of Britain's parliamentary and governmental powers was a bad idea as it allows people who were not voted for or selected by us to represent us on a international scale let alone produce laws and regulations by which we have to live. ...read more.


Thirdly an independent watchdog has been put into place over parliament (preliminary opinion in the E.C.J) And lastly when English legislation is written it is becoming more and more Eurocentric to stay in line with the rest of Europe, this is controversial and can be thought of as not a very good idea. It could be said that we are losing our heritage and becoming less British and more European. It would appear that we are looking at total entrenchment of all of Britain's institutional customary Law. It would also seem that, with the continuing developments of the EU, the acceptance of the Treaty of Nice 2001 and the inauguration of a possible 12 extra States, that the need for further legislation will be necessary. Legislation upon legislation, and all needing to be interpreted, implemented and ruled upon in unison with what (Europe) intends. I think instead of using the term 'crippling', I would sooner consider Europe's invasion of Britain's Law methodology as 'modernising'. Perhaps the UK's methods of case law, derived from religion and precedent are ineffectual and certainly with the proposal of a Human Rights Bill, could be seen to detract from what the impending Act could offer. But, there must surely come a time when there is so much Law, when we are so encompassed by Rules and Regulations, that any Human Rights Act would be immaterial. Indeed, as we are slowly, but surely forced to become Europeans, The will, and Law of Europe seems destined to overthrow Britain's domestic system of the Law entirely, compelling us to adopt a Monist approach as apposed to Dualist. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sources of Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sources of Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    the english legal system unit1 assignment4

    4 star(s)

    Furthermore it can be seen that the judiciary is independent It could, therefore, be dangerous for there to be a Government Minister (politically appointed) who was, for example, in charge of the Judiciary. Judges quite often decide on matters involving the Government or individual Ministers as to whether their actions were legal or illegal.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Critically discuss different possible meanings of justice and explore the relationship between law and ...

    3 star(s)

    For example, if a general practitioner would have to pay �500,000 for the surgical services in order to operate on an individual, who would he operate on; the one who has a life threatening condition which would use most of the budget up, or one whose condition is not life threatening and wouldn't use most of the budget up?

  1. Explain the distinction between the law and morals and consider the importance of the ...

    it could be argued is acting in a purely homophobic way here. In the sport of Boxing you can consent to being knocked out and even if you go as far as to kill someone you would not be guilty of murder however if the organisation wasn't there you can

  2. "The dichotomy between employee and self-employed is being eroded in employment law, so much ...

    The Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 1981 provides that "employee" is "any individual who works for another person whether under a contract for service or apprenticeship or otherwise" but goes on to specifically provide that it does not include a person who "provides services under a contract for services".

  1. Parliamentary supremacy

    within the UK constitution there is increasing uncertainty regarding parliamentary supremacy with British membership to the European Union. Similarly Parliament may bind future parliaments by changing the composition of the Houses of Parliament or the throne. This was the case in 1832 when Parliament reformed the House of Commons as

  2. Judicial Precedent

    In some cases they have to avoid awkward precedents, and there are many ways in which they can do this. Where the facts of the case before are significantly different from those of the earlier one, then the judge distinguishes the two cases and need not follow the earlier one.

  1. Legislations and regulations in sport

    It forms part of what is commonly referred to as the 'European 6-pack'. It contains 12 specific Regulations covering: Risk Assessment; Health and Safety Arrangements and Assistance; Health Surveillance; Danger Procedures; Information for Employees - their Duties, Capabilities and Training; advice on Co-operation and Co-ordination and for persons working in host employers undertakings.

  2. AS LAW - Judicial Precedent

    the case was unlikely to be appealed to the House Of Lords for cost reasons so it couldn't be over-ruled there and 2) because it involved the common problem of divorce settlements it would be likely to affect lots of other couples in the future.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work