Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3

Discuss the meaning of 'justice'. Consider the extent to which justice is achieved in the application of legal rules. Relate your answer to examples drawn from civil law, criminal law or both

Extracts from this essay...

Introduction

Discuss the meaning of 'justice'. Consider the extent to which justice is achieved in the application of legal rules. Relate your answer to examples drawn from civil law, criminal law or both When the dictionary definitions of justice are considered, it is difficult to interpret a straightforward meaning of justice as the definitions can vary. Osborn's Concise Law Dictionary defines justice as 'the upholding of rights, and the punishment of wrongs, by the law'. The Concise Oxford Dictionary defines justice as 'just conduct; fairness; exercise of authority in maintenance of right. (Just = acting or done in accordance with what is morally right or proper.) (Fair = free from discrimination, dishonesty... in conformity with rules or standards.)' In the first definition, it is defined that unjust conduct is that which is punishable by law, and although there is a certain level of ambiguity, a clear connection between law and justice can be seen. The second definition draws more of a connection between morality and justice; acts which are immoral are unjust.

Middle

Natural law theorists believe that all law comes from a higher source, which is superior to man made law and is based on moral rules. Aristotle believed this source could be nature whereas St Aquinas believed it was God. Some natural law theorists even believe it's permissible to break laws if they do not conform with moral rules. St Aquinas believed that laws went against the public and had no legitimacy, however he would not agree with breaking laws which would cause public disruption, as he believed this would have been against the will of God. Positivists believe that providing a law is made according to the correct procedures, it should be followed whether or not it conflicts with morality. Kelsen believed that law and morality are entirely different concepts. He believed justice was an expression of individual preferences and values and that it was just not scientifically possible to define justice. Utilitarians assess the justice of rules by looking at their consequences. The philosophy was developed during the nineteenth century, mostly from the writings of Bentham and Mill.

Conclusion

In terms of substantial justice, mistakes have been rectified by the introduction of such things as the practice statement. It is important that the law is allowed to change its mind, to a certain extent, as the opinion of society develops and some ideas go from right to wrong. The practice statement has also given judges in the House of Lords to avoid awkward precedents, as in Merritt v Merritt where the court avoid the precedent from Balfour v Balfour. One of the most important factors is the conscience of the jury. Sometimes the decision of the jury will almost go against the evidence given in order to reach a decision which they consider to be just. It is important for judges to remember that no two crimes are alike in the proportionality of sentencing. They must find the right punishment to fit the crime and the person who committed it. The judge must also try to balance conflicting interests as best they can.

The above preview is unformatted text

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • Over 150,000 essays available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Over 180,000 student essays
  • Every subject and level covered
  • Thousands of essays marked by teachers

Related AS and A Level Machinery of Justice

  1. Describe the different aims of sentencing.

    avoid going to pubs and nightclubs, which could be the case if the offender was convicted of numerous violent acts which all occurred while under the influence of alcohol. This aim of incapacitation is also emphasised with the tagging system as the enforcement do not only know of your whereabouts

  2. I will look at different black theologies and different theories of justice, and attempt ...

    This condition is known as the "veil of ignorance," and if no one is able to have prior knowledge about his or her future position or statues, then compassion is ensured. This is because no "egoistic" individual would wish to help build a society that leaves them disadvantaged.

  1. Access to Civil Justice in This Age of Austerity

    an individual is entitled to legal advice is under scrutiny by the Law society, the body representing solicitors and the chairman of the Bar Council has expressed: âThe bill's proposals will cause great harm to ordinary people. We continue to make the case for access to justice in the strongest terms.

  2. Expert Testimony and Its Value In the Justice System

    Despite these decisions it remains unclear as to what level of expertise an expert must have and it is left to the judge or jury to decide what evidence is of worth and what isnât. There are currently numerous different rules regarding the use of expert witnesses yet it is

  1. Critically analyse the relationship between law and justice.

    a set of basic rights and principles which are best for all members of society, since nobody will be willing to disadvantage a section of society if they might find themselves a member of it. Law, on the other hand, is difficult to define.

  2. THE ACCESS to JUSTICE ACT 1999 Civil Cases The state funding of civil cases ...

    each local authority area to develop a coordinated funding and planning approach to legal service provision. 6) Costs for non-legally aided parties. At present the original rule that non-legally aided parties cannot get their costs from the legal aid fund remains but the Act does contain provisions for changing the

  1. Why do young people join gangs and other subcultures? How does a criminal sub ...

    In many cases, youths will hang out with gang members for up to a year before making a commitment to join. Initiation rites, which range from being beaten by a row of gang members, to committing a crime or harming a member of an opposing gang are sometimes required to

  2. Explain and comment on the main reforms made to the civil justice system after ...

    During this time you both can attempt to find an alternative dispute resolution by communicating directly with each other or through an expert, mediator or arbitrator. If the matter has not been resolved and you wish to pursue the matter then you must advise the courts accordingly.

  • Over 180,000 essays
    written by students
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to write
    your own great essays

Marked by a teacher

This essay has been marked by one of our great teachers. You can read the full teachers notes when you download the essay.

Peer reviewed

This essay has been reviewed by one of our specialist student essay reviewing squad. Read the full review on the essay page.

Peer reviewed

This essay has been reviewed by one of our specialist student essay reviewing squad. Read the full review under the essay preview on this page.