• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss the meaning of 'justice'. Consider the extent to which justice is achieved in the application of legal rules. Relate your answer to examples drawn from civil law, criminal law or both

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Discuss the meaning of 'justice'. Consider the extent to which justice is achieved in the application of legal rules. Relate your answer to examples drawn from civil law, criminal law or both When the dictionary definitions of justice are considered, it is difficult to interpret a straightforward meaning of justice as the definitions can vary. Osborn's Concise Law Dictionary defines justice as 'the upholding of rights, and the punishment of wrongs, by the law'. The Concise Oxford Dictionary defines justice as 'just conduct; fairness; exercise of authority in maintenance of right. (Just = acting or done in accordance with what is morally right or proper.) (Fair = free from discrimination, dishonesty... in conformity with rules or standards.)' In the first definition, it is defined that unjust conduct is that which is punishable by law, and although there is a certain level of ambiguity, a clear connection between law and justice can be seen. The second definition draws more of a connection between morality and justice; acts which are immoral are unjust. ...read more.

Middle

Natural law theorists believe that all law comes from a higher source, which is superior to man made law and is based on moral rules. Aristotle believed this source could be nature whereas St Aquinas believed it was God. Some natural law theorists even believe it's permissible to break laws if they do not conform with moral rules. St Aquinas believed that laws went against the public and had no legitimacy, however he would not agree with breaking laws which would cause public disruption, as he believed this would have been against the will of God. Positivists believe that providing a law is made according to the correct procedures, it should be followed whether or not it conflicts with morality. Kelsen believed that law and morality are entirely different concepts. He believed justice was an expression of individual preferences and values and that it was just not scientifically possible to define justice. Utilitarians assess the justice of rules by looking at their consequences. The philosophy was developed during the nineteenth century, mostly from the writings of Bentham and Mill. ...read more.

Conclusion

In terms of substantial justice, mistakes have been rectified by the introduction of such things as the practice statement. It is important that the law is allowed to change its mind, to a certain extent, as the opinion of society develops and some ideas go from right to wrong. The practice statement has also given judges in the House of Lords to avoid awkward precedents, as in Merritt v Merritt where the court avoid the precedent from Balfour v Balfour. One of the most important factors is the conscience of the jury. Sometimes the decision of the jury will almost go against the evidence given in order to reach a decision which they consider to be just. It is important for judges to remember that no two crimes are alike in the proportionality of sentencing. They must find the right punishment to fit the crime and the person who committed it. The judge must also try to balance conflicting interests as best they can. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Machinery of Justice section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Machinery of Justice essays

  1. Critically analyse the relationship between law and justice.

    A further example of substantive justice is equity, which was developed to enable the courts to do justice where the common law prevented it, by recognising new rights such as the rights of a beneficiary under a trust and new remedies such as the injunction and the order for specific performance.

  2. The European Court of Justice ensures that European law is applied throughout the member ...

    The Home Office had refused Duyn permission to enter the UK because she was a member of a certain religious group called scientologists which the Government did not want in the country at the time. Van argued that her exclusion was contrary to provisions of the Treaty of Rome on freedom of movement.

  1. Describe the different aims of sentencing.

    A Curfew Order is where an offender is ordered to remain at a fixed address for a minimum of two hours up to a maximum of twelve hours in a twenty-four hour period. Electronic tagging is often used in this type of sentence with certain offenders and they have a

  2. Balancing Competing Interests

    In contrast, Rewards may be attached to desirable behaviour to encourage the individual to set aside his own interests and act in the public interest. This is illustrated in the case of R v Craig where the judge ordered a reward of £500 to be given from public funds to

  1. THE ACCESS to JUSTICE ACT 1999 Civil Cases The state funding of civil cases ...

    Community Legal Service Partnerships Under the 1999 Act the Legal Services Commission has a duty to liaise with other funders of legal services to develop networks of legal service providers and so widen public access. This is to be achieved through the creation of Community Legal Service Partnerships in

  2. Critically evaluate the aims and consequences of sentencing and show how the laws regarding ...

    In Hllington and Emmens (1985) 7 Cr App R (S) 364 the offenders did not plead guilty until the last possible minute and appealed stating that the court had not taken into consideration their guilty plea. This was rejected at appeal.

  1. Access to Civil Justice in This Age of Austerity

    an individual is entitled to legal advice is under scrutiny by the Law society, the body representing solicitors and the chairman of the Bar Council has expressed: âThe bill's proposals will cause great harm to ordinary people. We continue to make the case for access to justice in the strongest terms.

  2. Expert Testimony and Its Value In the Justice System

    be prevented from doing so just because they do not meet the necessary criteria. The other option is to use a subjective test. This would involve the decision on an expertâs ability being made by an individual rather than by an objective test of fact.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work