• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss the nature of legal and moral issues. Consider whether the law does and should reflect moral views

Extracts from this document...


Discuss the nature of legal and moral issues. Consider whether the law does and should reflect moral views. "The law" has been described by Sir John Salmond as "a body of principles recognised and applied by the state in the administration of justice". Whereas John Austin defined law as a command issued from a sovereign power to an inferior and enforced coercion". Laws apply are compulsory and must be followed by all members of society, for example, the Offences Against the Person Act (1861) applied to and for everyone. Parliament creates laws and the laws are enforced by official bodies, such as the police. Non-compliance with laws can results in punishment, such as imprisonment, fines etc. "Morality" is defined by Phill Harris as "s set of beliefs, values, principles and standards of behaviours". They are subjective, and do not need to be abided by, like laws. They are enforced by social/domestic pressure and can be beliefs such as abortion, only having sex after marriage etc. However, not all people have the same moral beliefs but non-compliance with these can lead to disapproval within society and even exclusion. In relation to both law and morals, some laws don't have any real morality behind them, such as parking on a double yellow line and rules like "keeping off the grass" etc., and some morals are not backed up by law, such as adultery and sex before marriage. However, overall there are laws that contains some moral backing such as murder, which is legally and morally wrong - which can also link to religion due to the fact killing is one of the 10 commandments. ...read more.


There are two different theories with regards to law; the natural law theory and the positive theory. These are linked to the characteristics of laws and the theorists explain their views on whether laws which conflict with moral rules should be valid. The Natural law theory argues that law must be in accordance with a higher moral code to be valid. If it is not moral, then that law is not valid. Natural law theorists believe that the validity of a law depends upon it's compatibility with a high moral authority. St Thomas Aquinas and the Greek philosopher Aristotle believed natural law to be the eternal law implanted by God as part of human nature. We therefore have, for example, a natural law inclination to preserve life and procreate. This divine law is revealed to mankind in various religious codes, for example, the Ten Commandments. Another natural law theorist, Lon Fuller, believed the natural law was earth based. To be valid, a law had to conform to an inner morality and comply with eight principles, including being prospective and possible for people to obey. On the other hand, the positivist theory believes that a law that is made in a manner recognised by the sovereign power of the state is valid, irrespective to its content. One legal positivist, Jeremy Bentham actually rejected natural law by referring to it as 'nonsense on stilts'. John Austin and HLA Hart explain the positivist theory differently. John Austin said 'The existence of law is one thing, it's merit or demerit is another. ...read more.


The law also does reflect Hart's view. The case of Gillick V West Norfolk concerned the prescription of contraception to children under the age of 16 without parental consent. It was argued that if a person can understand the issues of contraceptive treatment, a third party should not have the right to interfere. Another example is in December 2000 where the age of consent for homosexuals was reduced from 18 to 16. The decision was made as the rights of homosexuals are increasing to be seen in the Civil Partnership Act (2004) which allows couples of the same sex to be recognised as having the same rights and equal treatment as married couples in a range of areas (e.g. employment). There are also some issues that are still open for debate but are slightly changing. Such as the Diane Pretty Case (2001) which brought up issues about euthanasia. Although he law still does not aloe this, it is an issue which is constantly under discussion due to the controversial nature and its moral implications. In conclusion to everything discussed, it is apparent that there are many different views of the link between the issues of law and morality, and whether they should be treated separately. Although there are some laws which do not contain a moral or some moral backing, it is sure that the majority of laws contain moral implications. Whether these laws should reflect moral views, is a topic that is still open for further debate due to the fact the question of laws reflecting the morality of the public remains unanswered. ?? ?? ?? ?? Jan Lewis Law and morals essay ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sources of Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sources of Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    the english legal system unit1 assignment4

    4 star(s)

    In respect to possible claims against a solicitor for negligence all solicitors are obliged to take out a professional indemnity insurance policy. There is also a necessary requirement to pay into the Law Society's Compensation Fund which was set up to repay the Clients of Solicitors who have been fraudulent or dishonest.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Examine the debate as to whether the law should reflect moral values, and discuss ...

    3 star(s)

    They are normative. There are similarities between the two. A law exists or it doesn't. Whereas morals are much vaguer. Some activities are immoral and illegal. For instance murder or theft. The ideas of morality change over time, like the legal code of rules.

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Critically discuss different possible meanings of justice and explore the relationship between law and ...

    3 star(s)

    This way, the government as well as society know that these laws will be adhered to, and looked up to. This is because they are the laws which society produce and are more imaginary for the majority than having legal laws by the government.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    The english legal system unit1 assignment3 three part question

    3 star(s)

    Also, the presumption of Retrospective Effect: This is against a legislation being back-dated. Thus it can be seen that there are various aids and presumptions that assist Judges in trying to find out what a piece of legislation means. But the above does not help if the words of a statute are misleading or liable to different meanings.

  1. Commercial law discussion - 'Transfer of Title by a Non-Owner'.

    third party shouldn't obtain a good title from the defendant when he bought from him in good faith. The sale in the Bishopsgate case has taken place in a market overt, in Ganly v. Ledwidge (1876) and Delaney v. Wallis and Sons (1884)

  2. Explain the distinction between the law and morals and consider the importance of the ...

    He argues that judges have the residual right to protect and preserve some sort of common morality. Moral contradictions in the law can also appear, while abortion can be carried out legitimately, the courts have refused action for 'wrongful life' in McKay v Essex AHA because it is contrary to the principle of the sanctity of life.

  1. Unmarried fathers and their children - has the law got it right?

    duties and the powers compromised in 'parental responsibility' and not to concentrate on the fact that what is at issue is conferring upon a committed father the status of parenthood for which nature has already ordained that he must bear responsibility."26 This could be viewed as a problematic statement, due

  2. “English law does not in general impose liability for a failure to act despite ...

    Therefore the person would not have been a direct cause of that loss of life, but may well have been able to save it. For someone to be liable for a crime by omitting to act, there must be a duty to act.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work