• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss the role of hardship clauses in controlling liability by contract.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

TOPIC: DISCUSS THE ROLE OF HARDSHIP CLAUSES IN CONTROLLING LIABILITY BY CONTRACT. Introduction The fundamental principle of the law of contract is that the parties to a contract must carry out their contractual obligations. The principle of hardship operates as a modification of the principle of pacta sunt servanda; it gives relief to a party where performance of a contractual obligation due to change of circumstances becomes extremely onerous. This essay will discuss the role of hardship clauses in controlling liability by contract. The first part briefly states the key elements of hardship clauses. The second part considers the role of hardship clauses in controlling liability from a theoretical perspective whilst the third part undertakes an analysis of the elements of hardship clauses with a view to finding out when such clauses can be used to limit liability under a contract. The fourth part discusses the obligation to renegotiate, and some sanctions for failure to successfully renegotiate a solution in the changed circumstances. 1. Contents of Hardship Clauses Hardship clauses are usually incorporated in long-term construction contracts, infrastructure projects, joint ventures, management and marketing agreements and other contracts requiring regular performance of services or delivery of goods from a particular source of supply. Though the details of hardship clauses in each contracts vary, the essential elements of any such clause is that the occurrence of certain events has fundamentally altered the equilibrium of the contract, ...read more.

Middle

The second step is whether the event is beyond the control of the party invoking the hardship clause. The third step involves the effect of the event on the performance of the contractual obligation. Step 1: Is there an event of hardship? The hardship clause should set out the circumstances in which the clause is applicable. It is possible to provide, as with force majeure, a catalogue of circumstances which constitute hardship but in such case it will be necessary to have a concluding general clause because it is the characteristic of hardship that not all its contingencies are foreseeable. Some examples are significant rise in raw materials or sharp devaluation of currency making the initial contractual arrangement "financially disastrous" to a contractual party. In addition to setting out the circumstances, one has to ask if the hardship event was reasonably foreseeable by the parties to the contract, and if yes, there is no excuse for invoking hardship clause. The rationale behind the test is that the failure of a party to contractually insulate itself from the occurrence of a foreseeable contingency is ipso facto an assumption of that risk.11 In answering the issue of foreseeability, the arbitrator should neither refer to an excessively concerned "pessimist who foresees all sorts of disasters" nor to a "resolute optimist who never anticipates the least misfortune."12 The issue rather is whether any of the parties ought to have reasonably foreseen a realistic possibility that an impediment to performance would occur. ...read more.

Conclusion

Apart from arbitration, the parties may also provide that, if the renegotiation results in failure, the contract shall be suspended or terminated or that either party may claim suspension or termination.23 They may also provide for third party intervention or for recourse to the courts, a clause which would seem to be superfluous unless combined with prorogatio fori, because otherwise it is self-evident that recourse to the courts is open to the party who feels aggrieved. Conclusion: The absolute application of the pacta sunt servanda rule in long-term contracts may be quite harsh since during the existence of the contractual relationship unpredictable and unavoidable factors could render the performance of the contractual obligations excessively onerous or unfair. The purpose of hardship clauses is to ensure that the parties renegotiate the terms of the agreement in such changed circumstances so as to adjust their contractual obligations in a mutually acceptable manner. Care should be taken in drafting such clauses so that no party can take unfair advantage of such clauses; only fundamental change in circumstances beyond the control of the parties should allow reliance on hardship clause. Further, to maximise the effectiveness of hardship clauses, it is suggested that an arbitrator or a third party intervenor should be appointed under the clause to adapt the terms of the contract should the parties fail to come to a mutually acceptable solution. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Law of Contract section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Law of Contract essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    "The requirement of consideration is an unnecessary complication in the formation of contracts."

    4 star(s)

    Thus, in this sense, a party who receives unrequested benefits is not legally compelled to return the favor as evidently, the other party has acted voluntarily. Therefore, promises made for something in the past is no consideration. Such a contract is not enforceable such as in the cases of Eastwood

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Contract Law - Offer And Acceptance

    3 star(s)

    place an order"17 * An when there is alternative proposal the acceptance must be cleared to which one they are directed to. Peter Lind & Co. Ltd v Mersey Docks & Harbour Board 1972 An offer to build a freight terminal was made by a tender quoting in the alternative

  1. Four ways in which a contract may be discharged.

    the sums are paid, and, in the case of sums so payable, cease to be so payable Provided that if the party to whom the sums were so paid or payable incurred expenses before the time of discharge in, or for the purpose of, the performance of the contract, the

  2. Exclusion clause

    Sec.2 (1): Under s.2 (1) any clause attempting to exclude liability for death or personal injury caused by negligence will be ineffective. Sec.2 (2): Under s.2 (2) any clause excluding liability for negligently caused loss or damage to property will be ineffective unless it satisfies the test of reasonableness (below).

  1. Void and voidable Contracts.

    leading him to believe that he could make higher profits than he possibly could. Dan can sue for negligent misrepresentation and can claim damages for financial loss. In the case of Esso Petroleum v Mardon [1976], Esso's experienced representative told Mardon that Esso estimated that the throughput of petrol on a certain site would reach 200,000 gallons.

  2. LAW OF CONTRACT. LAW 103. THE CONTENT OF THE CONTRACT.

    The modern classification is: conditions, warranties, innominate terms. The remedies available to the innocent party depend upon the type of term broken. Traditionally the courts classified terms into only two types: conditions and warranties. The third type, the innominate term, has been recognised only relatively recently.

  1. Evaluate the law of formation of contract in the context of modern methods of ...

    However, the court held against the offeror and offeree as from an objective viewpoint, there was no evidence of an acceptance from the nephew. But this can be disputed as here was evidence of the offeree instructing the auctioneer to withdraw the horse from the auction.

  2. Aspects of Contract and Business Law Case Studies

    This meant that it was an invitation for the bidders to make an offer and it is up to the auctioneer to accept or reject the offers Therefore when the gavel falls it does not necessarily mean that. The bid of £19000 made by Tracy did not meet the reserve

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work