• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss the view that all legal approaches to reducing inequalities are fundamentally flawed.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Discuss the view that all legal approaches to reducing inequalities are fundamentally flawed. In today's society it is assumed that everyone has the right to equal opportunities. These equal opportunities include equal access to public services, to job opportunities and income, the freedom of access and movement, the right to be free from harassment and equal access to means of determining equal access, in other words who gets what, who is excluded and who is not, basically the right to vote. It can be hard to determine what equal is, does it mean we all get the same treatment or at least we should do or is equality associated more with what matches our needs? It's a difficult question to answer, as we have to then delve into who decides our needs for us. Who is equality for? Ideally everyone. Most equality issues deal with the same sets of people, those who are disadvantaged in some way in society, whether individually or collectively as a group. Some disadvantaged groups are, Black and minority ethnic groups, young males, women, gay and lesbian people, faith groups, older people and those with disabilities. ...read more.

Middle

Disabled people have also experienced inequality in society for centuries; sometimes people's attitudes have totally dismissed the rights of disabled people, at times to the point at which individuals have decided that those with disabilities are abnormal or a burden on society's resources. As far back as medieval Germany, disabled people were experiencing these unfair attitudes. It was in medieval Germany that Martin Luther permitted the killing of disabled babies as 'incarnations of the devil'. Centuries later, Hitler attempted to rid Germany of disabled people under his fascist regime; according to him they were 'imperfections which contaminate the genetic stream'. Although society has moved on, we cannot stop these kinds of opinions. One of the most important pieces of disability legislation is the Disability Discrimination Act 1995. The act covered physical disabilities, learning difficulties and mental illness. Today, a lot of institutions have been made to make changes in order to accommodate disabled people, disabled toilets, ramps for disabled access, special computer programmes for the blind, deaf, dyslexic, etc. However, not all institutes can afford to make changes unless given government help. Others simply choose not too. Edge hill has a water tight equal opportunities policy and yet they put disabled parking outside a building which cannot be accessed by a wheelchair. ...read more.

Conclusion

Certain individuals will always discriminate. Article 13 came out of the treaty of Amsterdam and includes three measures to combat discrimination, an employment directive, a race directive and an action programme. Article 13 created statutory commissions involving full investigation, codes of practice, guidance and support at tribunals. This is one of the most significant pieces of legislation; however, it cannot be monitored properly. What people say they will do and what they actually do are often two very different things. Some argue that Britain needs just one single equality act. Lord Lester (2001) believes one single act is needed. But, will having one single act make inequality disappear? No. The law may be able to punish those who step out of line but it cannot change people's attitudes. In fact as far as punishment goes, there is no imprisonment for those not following equality legislation, so how can it truly be enforced? Society is too complex, people are rigid in the way they work, and change takes time. Some don't believe in equality, after all, inequality can be seen as a natural occurrence. Since time began, someone or something has always been inferior/superior. Laws and policies can only try to control inequality but they will never combat it, it has existed throughout time and will continue to do so. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sources of Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sources of Law essays

  1. "The dichotomy between employee and self-employed is being eroded in employment law, so much ...

    V Cope14 and Nethermere (St Neots) Ltd v Taverna and Another15, it was decided that home workers were employees, in Cope, because work was provided on a regular basis and there was a strong element of control and, in Nethermere, because, in reality, there was a mutuality of obligations because of the length of the relationship.

  2. Women and Discrimination under the Law

    The ineffectiveness of the supposedly protective legislation is apparent in the fact that it has been close to thirty years since the laws were passed yet gender inequalities still continue to exist in the labour market. The inadequacies of the Sex Discrimination Act can be further illustrated by its application in pregnancy and maternity cases.

  1. Investigate The Employment Of People With Disabilities

    secretary-interpreters or other aids that enable the deaf employee to function effectively in work. Speech Speech Disorders Because speech is a learned function, any interference with learning ability may be expected to cause speech impairment. The most common interfering conditions are certain neuroses and psychoses, mental retardation, and brain damage, whether congenital or acquired.

  2. "Public policy has been slow to treat disability as a matter of equality, human ...

    capabilities and dexterity, have been left to survive on very little, not only have their standards of living been menial, and demeaning but their capacity to live fully integrated and socially active lives have been denied. Researchers Gwynne and Miller5 commented upon the treatment of those living in Le Court

  1. From your studies how far do you agree that Britain has been a tolerant ...

    The Alien act was passed and became law on 10th August 1905. It appeared to stand to stop those without money or a way of supporting themselves entering Britain. However, if the immigrant is seeking admission to avoid persecution or punishment on religious or political grounds, permission to enter shall

  2. Police powers vs Stop and Search

    hairstyle, mode of dress, or previous convictions for possessing an unlawful article. In carrying out a search the police may not force you - but may request you - to remove any clothing in public - even if the street is empty - other than an outer coat, jacket or gloves.

  1. Multicultural Britain

    Thus the government took action and to tolerate this, passed the Nationality Act of 1981. British Nationals were no longer British citizens so it became harder to migrate. Asylum seekers were the next minority in the 1990's. They arrived mainly from Bosnia and Afghanistan.

  2. Should people have a right to privacy?

    In July 2011 he was arrested again and released on bail on suspicion of corruption. This suggests to me that phone hacking in England is seen as a very serious crime once substantial evidential research is done. A similar idea is the right to publicity, what are the rights of

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work