• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss whether or not the most appropriate people are chosen as judges

Extracts from this document...


Discuss whether or not the most appropriate people are chosen as judges Judges can be split into two categories; superior and inferior. Although each judge has a different role in their own court all appointment of judges goes through the Lord Chancellor, currently Lord Falconer. But whether the appointment of judges is a fair process or not is a topic of interest and certain biases have been shown to exist. For superior judges (Law Lords, Lord Justices of Appeal and Puisne Judges) it is the Lord Chancellor that actually selects them and does the appointing. However this has been shown to be an unfair process. There is an 'Old Boys Network' which basically means that if you are a friend of, or are known to the Lord Chancellor you have a higher chance of being selected as a judge. ...read more.


The process of appointing superior judges is extremely secretive so it is very easy for him to appoint the people he prefers without it becoming public knowledge that he knew them previously. When appointing inferior judges the vacancies are advertised. Although out of the people that apply it is up to the Lord Chancellor to have the final say. Another issue to do with the appointment of judges is how sexist and racist it appears to be as there is a higher percentage of men than women as judges, and a much higher percentage of white people than people from other races which is distinctly unfair as your sex and race has nothing to do with how well you do your job. ...read more.


The 2002 figures show that in the superior courts there are no people black or Asian people, which is extremely unfair. The highest percentage of black or Asian people falls on the Assistant Recorders, having 5.8% of people coming from these minorities. By looking at the information it is evident that the most appropriate people are definitely not chosen as judges. The basis from which they are selected is extremely biased whether this be by the Lord Chancellor and his 'Old Boys Network' or the issue of someone's sex and/or race. Whether you know the Lord Chancellor or are a white male does not in any affect how good you are at your job so whilst the selection process s this biased we may not be presented with the best judges possible. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Legal personnel section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Legal personnel essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    European law

    4 star(s)

    bring an action where he is the addressee of a decision and there is a little problem demonstrating locus standi in such situation. Nevertheless, the treaty provides that where a decision has been addressed to another person, that person may bring in an action as long as they can demonstrate that the act has affected them directly and individually.

  2. The role and appointment of judges.

    For all other candidates recommended for appointment, a series of good character checks are done with the police, Revenue and Customs and relevant professional bodies. The Lord Chancellor may also require candidates to undergo a medical assessment before the appointment is confirmed.

  1. Free essay

    Legal personnel

    Lord Chief Justice from the judiciary, to the Queen, and select committees in the legislature scrutinizing heads of the different jurisdictions in the judiciary. However in order not to cross the boundary between the judiciary and the legislature this is done rarely.

  2. Family Law

    Any period or periods totalling less than six months will be disregarded. However, the court will consider an accumulative period of six moths or more. There is no requirement to actually name the person with whom the respondent has committed adultery.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work