• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss whether trial by jury should be retained or abolished.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Discuss whether trial by jury should be retained or abolished Juries have and remain to be a core of our legal system, and evidence of 'trial by peers' can be traced back to 1215. In Bushell's Case (1670) it shows that by the seventeenth century the role of the jury as 'masters of the facts' had been established. In favour of retaining the jury role, it has obviously been used from this length of time without any setback and is the primary function of a criminal case (Crown Court and above) being used successfully for years. In our legal system, a jury trial will always seem to prevail in justice, as put by David Bean QC ex-chairman of the Bar Council, 'the evidence is clear: people trust juries'. As long as laymen are involved in the legal proceedings of a criminal case in some fashion, it proves that our legal system is comprehensible and that people can rely on 'normal' people providing the outcome for a case. Jury trial should be retained as when selecting a jury it is wholly random, providing many different people from different social backgrounds with plenty of different perspectives. If jury trial was to be abolished, and a single judge would merit the case, there would only be one narrow perspective, rather than twelve perspectives. ...read more.

Middle

In civil cases, juries are used to decide both the liability of the parties and the amount of damages that may be awarded. This leads to the problem that with such a varying background of individuals in the jury, there will be misconceptions to how much money is appropriate for the case, and there are extreme cases of over-awarding damages, or awarding too little damages in cases. This is subject to many external problems, such as the case may have received media attention, therefore members of the jury may already have perceived conceptions about one of the parties. In a civil case, the Court of Appeal previously had no power to correct awards which they thought may have been too high or too low, which perhaps led to one cases in 1989 where Lord Aldington was awarded �1,500,000 - in relation to a personal injury case this size of award may only be capable to a person who had been severely and permanently disabled. In 1990, Parliament enacted section eight of the Courts and Legal Services Act 1990 which case the Court of Appeal special powers in such cases as over compensation, etc. This would allow the Court of Appeal to order a new trial or substitute a new sum which they deem as more appropriate to the factors involved. ...read more.

Conclusion

Disadvantages of a jury in a criminal case are that they may have troubles comprehending the legal complexities in a case. In some cases, juries may be too unmotivated to understand the case, and since they are not required to have their decision justified, may just vote with the majority in order to end the case and resume their normal lives. Another problem with juries is that they also increase expenditure for the legal parties and take a lot more time than those in the Magistrates Court. Statistics suggest that an average of �14,000 is spent on a Crown Court trial, where a magistrate's trial contested is just �2,500. However, variance is expected. Perhaps a less observed problem with juries is that the jury service is compulsory and in some cases workers may lose out on opportunities in their normal life, and that attending jury service for them may be very costly. The expenses for undertaking the service will not provide an equivalent sum in most cases. As juries are left to such complexities of the law, it is important that there is a balance that they will be able to understand the case and make a rational decision while not being thrown by the legal jargon. If each individual member of the jury works together and discusses the evidence fully, there should be no problem with jury trial. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Criminal Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Criminal Law essays

  1. Compare the English legal system to that of two other countries

    Magistrate's court There is a magistrate's court in every large town and most criminal cases are heard here. There are 11 types of people involved; * Magistrates - there are normally three magistrates. They are unpaid and take time off their jobs only receiving expenses.

  2. The justifiable use of force in self-defence depends entirely upon the circumstances in which ...

    It has been made clear that psychiatric problems are not to be considered for self-defence, but instead was given diminished responsibility. However, Martin had claimed that he had experienced burglary for years and had lost faith in the police, who may have been ineffective.

  1. The Crown Procecution Service

    discontinuance rates being for charges of violence against the person and criminal damage, and the lowest for motoring offences. This is clearly a matter for concern, the reasons for which must be investigated." From this we can see that the performance of the CPS is very poor as their decision

  2. Free essay

    police powers

    The police can also enter a premise with out a warrant if it is in order to arrest a person named in an arrest warrant, or to arrest some one for an arrest able offence. This is set out in section 17 of PACE.

  1. Outline the range of duties undertaken by lay magistrates. Comment on how well Lay ...

    interview which is where the panel of judges try to find out more about the person and his attributes. After that then it goes to a second interview, at the second interview, the panel aim to test the candidate potential judicial aptitude by discussing a couple of cases studies with them.

  2. List and explain the six most important cases for the law on insanity, explaining ...

    In Windle, the defendant gave his wife 100 aspirins, which killed her. He gave himself up to police, and said ?I suppose they will hang me for this?. He was suffering from a mental illness, but these words indicated that he knew what he had done was wrong.

  1. Critically discuss the Labour Governments record of crime control since coming to power in ...

    Although there are a number of crimes recorded by the police which the BCS does not cover, including drug offences, murder, fraud, and sexual offences, BCS shows more crime than the Criminal Statistics do; only 42% of crimes in the comparable subset of BCS offences were reported to the police

  2. Sources of the English Legal System and the Relationship between Legislation and Judicial ...

    her wealth because he had killed the deceased (Huxley-Binns & Binns, 2008). Another case is Maddox v Storer (1963), Under the Road Traffic Act 1960 it was an offence to drive 30mph in a vehicle ?adapted to carry more than seven passengers?.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work