• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss whether trial by jury should be retained or abolished.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Discuss whether trial by jury should be retained or abolished Juries have and remain to be a core of our legal system, and evidence of 'trial by peers' can be traced back to 1215. In Bushell's Case (1670) it shows that by the seventeenth century the role of the jury as 'masters of the facts' had been established. In favour of retaining the jury role, it has obviously been used from this length of time without any setback and is the primary function of a criminal case (Crown Court and above) being used successfully for years. In our legal system, a jury trial will always seem to prevail in justice, as put by David Bean QC ex-chairman of the Bar Council, 'the evidence is clear: people trust juries'. As long as laymen are involved in the legal proceedings of a criminal case in some fashion, it proves that our legal system is comprehensible and that people can rely on 'normal' people providing the outcome for a case. Jury trial should be retained as when selecting a jury it is wholly random, providing many different people from different social backgrounds with plenty of different perspectives. If jury trial was to be abolished, and a single judge would merit the case, there would only be one narrow perspective, rather than twelve perspectives. ...read more.

Middle

In civil cases, juries are used to decide both the liability of the parties and the amount of damages that may be awarded. This leads to the problem that with such a varying background of individuals in the jury, there will be misconceptions to how much money is appropriate for the case, and there are extreme cases of over-awarding damages, or awarding too little damages in cases. This is subject to many external problems, such as the case may have received media attention, therefore members of the jury may already have perceived conceptions about one of the parties. In a civil case, the Court of Appeal previously had no power to correct awards which they thought may have been too high or too low, which perhaps led to one cases in 1989 where Lord Aldington was awarded �1,500,000 - in relation to a personal injury case this size of award may only be capable to a person who had been severely and permanently disabled. In 1990, Parliament enacted section eight of the Courts and Legal Services Act 1990 which case the Court of Appeal special powers in such cases as over compensation, etc. This would allow the Court of Appeal to order a new trial or substitute a new sum which they deem as more appropriate to the factors involved. ...read more.

Conclusion

Disadvantages of a jury in a criminal case are that they may have troubles comprehending the legal complexities in a case. In some cases, juries may be too unmotivated to understand the case, and since they are not required to have their decision justified, may just vote with the majority in order to end the case and resume their normal lives. Another problem with juries is that they also increase expenditure for the legal parties and take a lot more time than those in the Magistrates Court. Statistics suggest that an average of �14,000 is spent on a Crown Court trial, where a magistrate's trial contested is just �2,500. However, variance is expected. Perhaps a less observed problem with juries is that the jury service is compulsory and in some cases workers may lose out on opportunities in their normal life, and that attending jury service for them may be very costly. The expenses for undertaking the service will not provide an equivalent sum in most cases. As juries are left to such complexities of the law, it is important that there is a balance that they will be able to understand the case and make a rational decision while not being thrown by the legal jargon. If each individual member of the jury works together and discusses the evidence fully, there should be no problem with jury trial. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Criminal Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Criminal Law essays

  1. Compare the English legal system to that of two other countries

    Magistrate's court There is a magistrate's court in every large town and most criminal cases are heard here. There are 11 types of people involved; * Magistrates - there are normally three magistrates. They are unpaid and take time off their jobs only receiving expenses.

  2. Free essay

    Jury and Magistrate Exam Questions

    to commit a crime in order to prevent another (usually more serious). The jury found all three women not guilty even though the evidence clearly showed they caused all of the damage. Their defence was that 1/3 of the population of East Timor had been killed and the plane was likely to be used to attack the survivors.

  1. Free essay

    police powers

    It can also elect to manage or supervise the police investigation into a particular complaint and can independently investigate the most serious cases itself. 2. How do they help control the activities of the police? They make sure that the complaints against the police are dealt with effectively.

  2. Outline the range of duties undertaken by lay magistrates. Comment on how well Lay ...

    The magistrate's court does have the power to give 6-month sentence and a fine up to �5000. They also have some civil responsibilities such as enforcement of council tax debts. They have some work in the family courts panel, relating to breakdown of marriages.

  1. The justifiable use of force in self-defence depends entirely upon the circumstances in which ...

    However it does allow citizens to defend themselves when they feel that they need to. Whether or not mistakes can be used as to use force are arisen in common law. In Williams (1987) the defendant saw a man repeatedly punching a youth who was struggling and calling for help.

  2. Sources of the English Legal System and the Relationship between Legislation and Judicial ...

    Consequently, the mischief rule goes further than either of the other rules. The mischief rule allows for better analysis into the position of the statute in relation to the law taken as a whole and provides the court with more latitude in their creation of the statute.

  1. List and explain the six most important cases for the law on insanity, explaining ...

    Despite the fact that some courts seem to have an apparent disregard for the doctrine of judicial precedent, Burgess remains one of the most important cases in developing the law on insanity, as it decided that a condition which affects 2% of the population is insanity, rather than non-insane automatism.

  2. Critically discuss the Labour Governments record of crime control since coming to power in ...

    Indeed, in a small unpublished study in one subdivision of a British city, Pepinksy showed how influential recording rates could be; he showed that almost half the year?s ?increase in crime? had been produced by the police recording every admission by a single offender who frequently stole milk bottles from doorsteps.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work