• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Do animals have rights? If they do, when animals kill and eat each other, do they violate each other's rights?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Do animals have rights? If they do, when animals kill and eat each other, do they violate each other's rights? The argument for animal rights assumes that animals posses their own lives and deserve to be assigned rights in order to protect their wellbeing. This view insists that animals are not merely goods utilised only to benefit mankind and they should be allowed to choose how they want to live their lives, free from the constraints of man. But if animals are given absolute rights, then surely they shouldn't be allowed to kill each other, as this would be a violation of these rights. Should murderous animals be administered prison sentences or even...capital punishment? One method of preventing animals killing each other would be to provide animals with a vegetarian environment which caters for their every need. However, in this fictional vegetarian world wouldn't the rights of the animal be suppressed as it is being held in captivity against its will? From an evolutionary point of view it is the natural right of a stronger animal to devour a weaker one. If this is acceptable then surely it is acceptable for us to eat meat too, as we humans are more evolved than the creatures we eat. ...read more.

Middle

Does this mean that animals are only assigned rights when they enter the affections of a human being? I believe that every animal has the potential to become valued by a human but those who are more practical to live with are given an unfair advantage due to their convenient size, their diet and their cuteness. Some animals are obviously far more intelligent than others, but do they deserve rights to a greater degree than the lesser intelligent non-human beings? Jeremy Bentham was one of the first philosophers to treat this subject seriously, claiming that "a horse or dog is beyond comparison a more rational, as well as a more conversable animal than an infant of a day, or a week, or even a month old." He strongly believed that animals should be free from the oppression of mankind and is known to have said: "The day may come when the rest of the animal creation may acquire those rights which never could have been witholden from them but by the hand of tyranny." Although this is proof that arguments for animal rights are not just the product of modern political correctness and have been a concern since the 17th century, Bentham only mentions dogs and horses, animals which are owned by many, and are therefore given rights and protection, and are useful to mankind. ...read more.

Conclusion

Could this be because of how cute and entertaining dolphins can be? Perhaps it's a matter of the intelligence of a dolphin. Maybe the best way to assign rights to animals is based upon the general intelligence of the species. As humans we are far more intelligent, as a species, than any other life form and therefore rights are most important to us. Our right to kill animals for food must be upheld in order to keep us strong and to feed our Olympic athletes and soldiers. There's no denying that a lot of people find meat to be delicious and it has become a very important part of their diet. Although one can argue that it isn't worth an animal dying for us to enjoy the taste of meat, I would argue that it isn't worth me being deprived of meat so that one sheep, in a field of identical drones, completely lacking in personality and individuality, can live. Therefore I can conclude that animals have a certain kind of right, the right not to suffer. This is the only right I see fit to give to an animal because clearly feel pain and show signs of irritation. Therefore, when animals kill each other they are not violating each others rights as they are simply and innocently carrying out a natural function. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sources of Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sources of Law essays

  1. Jury Essay

    This helps promote the idea of fairness, also known as jury equity. A good example of this is in Ponting's Case (1984), where a civil servant leaked information, yet he pleaded not guilty, as he said that his actions were in the public's interest.

  2. Human Rights

    prostitution industry in Indonesia, and the useless nature of the unratified protocol. Therefore, it is clearly evidenced that international legal measure of the protocol is ineffectual in addressing the human rights issue of child prostitution unless the protocol is ratified into domestic law.

  1. "Public policy has been slow to treat disability as a matter of equality, human ...

    In conjunction to his argument, in which, Oliver criticises the small scale investments, catering to the needs of individuals, emptying out the State's kitty, in the absence of money instead being put towards large scale projects for the benefit of a wider range of disabled individuals.

  2. Care Values and Practice Module

    with regards to human rights infringements, there is the chance the ruling can be over turned by the European Court in Strasbourg. Question 2 In the case of Tisha it seems that most of her rights have been neglected, under the children's Act 2004.

  1. How has the European Court of Human Rights contributed to the protection of children's ...

    parental physical punishment, while already before Nielsen it had approved of such state legislation30. Notwithstanding this decision's significance, long years have passed since; Danish law, however, still failed to comply with Art. 12 UNCRC autonomy generally31. The Court's protective approach is clearly reflected in X and Y v.

  2. HUMAN RIGHTS

    This alone suggests that the development of cultural rights is still in progress. It must be noted here that there are a number of reasons for the slow development of cultural rights in response to its' immediate requirement in human rights.

  1. Human Rights.

    In Kaye v Robertson2, a newspaper reporter surreptitiously took pictures of an actor in hospital. The court found the privacy could not be used as a head of claim, but did note that this was an intrusion of the actor's privacy.

  2. Judicial Reform and Bill of Rights.

    The costs of solicitors and barristers fees are extremely high, so if the fees of legal action were reduced, the judicial system would not only be fairer but would also enable more people to ensure their rights. The first step, introducing a 'no win, no fee' format was followed by

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work