• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Economic Loss & Negligent Misstatements questions and answers

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Seminar 8 (Week 10): Economic Loss & Negligent Misstatements ________________ Sven, an accountant, is asked by Erik to value shares in Bell Enterprises Ltd to discover whether they are likely to prove a good investment. Sven and Erik are old friends and Sven states that he will value the shares for ?old times? sake? but that any statement which he makes as to the investment value of the shares is to be treated as a statement of opinion and that no reliance is to be placed thereon. Sven?s report states that the shares are certain to be a good investment. Erik leaks the report to the Morning Star, which duly publishes it. ...read more.

Middle

- Sven stated that he would value the shares for ?old times? sake? ? only an opinion and not to be relied on 2. Accountant ? Galoo v Bright Grahame Murray 2. Consider whether C?s economic losses recoverable from D in the following cases? 1. D advises C to invest his money in Bellnet plc. The company collapses and C loses his money. In order to meet his immediate financial needs, he has to borrow at a high rate of interest. 1. If D is a professional, and it was said in a professional (advice) circumstance then D will be liable for the loss. 2. However, if it is in a friend (social situation) ...read more.

Conclusion

C is given as a present a computer manufactured by D. There is a fault in the hard disk and C has to spend £500 putting it right. 1. Purely a present – there is no economic loss, as he did not buy the laptop it was a present, it was his choice to buy a new hard drive 1. C is given as a present a computer manufactured by D. There is a fault in the hard disk. As a result files containing the draft of his doctoral thesis are corrupted and C loses six months of his research work. 1. Would be hard to value what his research would cost? 2. Also a present 1. C has made a contract with X to maintain X’s central heating system for a fixed sum for a year. D negligently causes extensive damage to the system. 1. Liable for the damage caused ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Law of Contract section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Law of Contract essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Contract Law - Offer And Acceptance

    3 star(s)

    turn accepted as variation of the contract, either expressly or by conduct. Acceptance Of Tenders * Submission of tender usually amounts to an offer, and the effect of an acceptance of the tender depends on the interpretation of the documents; 1)

  2. Four ways in which a contract may be discharged.

    In the case of other loss or damage, a person cannot so exclude or restrict his liability for negligence except in so far as the term or notice satisfies the requirement of reasonableness. (3) Where a contract term or notice purports to exclude or restrict liability for negligence a

  1. Ian, an investment broker, wasapproached by Victor who asked him whether he should invest ...

    there must be reliance by P This would be no problem as inducement is clear because it was addressed to Victor and misled and secondly the above statement sounded like a good investment as such there is reliance on Victor's part which induce him enter into contract with Ian.

  2. Contract Practice for Alpha construction LTD.

    Ali Faizollahi (AF), Nikolaos Michalakis (NM) Agenda Items Item No. Details of issues to be discussed/objectives of discussions To be led by 1.0 Minutes of last meeting To agree the minutes of the meeting 17th February 2004 as an accurate record.

  1. I have been asked to advise a client on considering contracting with a building ...

    Also it was not an offer, which could be accepted since it was offered to the whole world." (Common law 1 BPP) The outcome of the case was that there was an offer as it was specified of what to do and it was an offer to the public can be accepted so as to form a contract.

  2. In advising Bennys position of the interest over the said property (the flat), it ...

    Under doctrine of "presumed resulting trust" is to protect a person, who provides the purchase money of a property, but put in someone else's name. The person (money provider) shall have intended to acquire a beneficial interest over the property7.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work