• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

ELEMENTS OF CONTRACT - OFFER AND ACCEPTANCE.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

ELEMENTS OF CONTRACT - OFFER AND ACCEPTANCE. QUESTION: Bob owns a stamp shop in Muncaster High Street. On Monday he places an item in the advertisement column of the Muncaster Evening Gazette. 'Utopian Penny Red Stamp, one for only, �750 or nearest offer'. Late that day, Alan, a stamp collector, telephones Bob and says 'The Utopian Red for sale, I'll take it for �700'. And Bob replies, 'I cannot accept less than �725 but I will not sell it to anyone else before Saturday. Let me have a reply by Friday if you want it'. 'That is kind of you. Remind me to buy you a drink when I see you'. On Wednesday Alan telephones Bob and leaves a message on his answering machine stating 'I accept your offer'. Unfortunately Bob's infant son later presses a button on the machine which erases the message before Bob listen to it. Later that day Bob sells the stamp to Cerdic for �750. ...read more.

Middle

By looking into the language of the advertisement which �750 or nearest offer, one could safely concluded that the advertisement by Bob would to an invitation to treat. An invitation to treat is a preliminary stage of an agreement, where one party seek to ascertain if the other is willing to enter into legally binding contract; Fisher v Bell. When later that day Alan a stamp collected telephoned Bob and said that he would take it for �700. This would amount to an offer. An offer is a final and unqualified assent to all the terms of the offer as per Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball. As on the facts Alan's statement was certain and shows his willingness to be bound immediately. Subsequent when Bob replied by saying that he would not accept anything less than �725. Even though the replied by Bob couched like an acceptance but it is not. This would amount to a counter offer, because he have introduce new terms to the original offer. ...read more.

Conclusion

Cerdic's aged mother who came to know from Cerdic's 9 year old son that the father have acquired the stamp from the High Street Dealer. Since this is question of fact and it is up to the courts to verify the effectiveness of the third revocation i.e. whether Alan can rely on third party revocation. If this is possible than Alan's act of posting the letter to Bob would have no effect because the revocation has taken place earlier. On the other hand if the third party revocation is not reasonable in circumstances then when Alan post a letter to Bob confirming the message there would be an acceptance by applying the postal rule i.e. the effectiveness of the acceptance is when the letter is posted and not when it was received. Since the revocation by Bob in writing required actual communication which is by Friday but the acceptance of Alan has taken place earlier as such one could safely conclude there is an agreement between Alan and Bob if the third party revocation is not reasonable. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Law of Contract section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Law of Contract essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Contract Law - Offer And Acceptance

    3 star(s)

    * So, it is just a supply of information and not an offer Harvey v Facey 1893 The plaintiff telegraph the defendant "Will you sell the Bumper Hall Pen?Telegraph the lower cash price". The defendant telegraphed in reply, "Lowest price for Bumper Pen Hall �900".

  2. Four ways in which a contract may be discharged.

    The plaintiff installed fixtures to run his car repair business. He was wrongfully evicted by the defendant. The local authority gave him permission to use his own garage as business premises. As a result he lost no profit and so claimed for the loss of his fixtures.

  1. Write a critical evaluation of the elements of any two property offences

    unfamiliar with - therefore it would be hard to treat the word 'dishonesty' as ordinary which may leave them perplexed as to how to apply it to the situation. Consequently not defining the mens rea of an act leaves visible holes in the law, where the judge and jury are

  2. What is the importance of implied terms to the contract of employment

    698 17 Johnstone v Bloomsbury HA; [1992] Q.B. 333 Ottoman Bank v Chakarian [1930] A.C. 277; 18 Morrish v Henlys (Folkestone) [1973] 2 All E.R. 137; Gregory v Ford [1951] 1 All E.R. 121 19 This includes working in competition with him, disclosing confidential information to outside parties etc.

  1. Contract law - Advise Sarah - The first thing to ascertain is whether the ...

    On appeal, the advertisement was held to be an 'invitation to treat', since it was necessary to protect the advertiser from liability in Contract should demand for the advertised goods exceed supply.3 As a result, the appellant's criminal conviction was quashed.

  2. Invitation To Treat

    In this case the delivery of a standard form agreement by the defendant to the plaintiff was alleged to be an offer. A statement of intention is known in law as an 'invitation to treat'. To hold otherwise would mean that every advertisers and catalogue published is obliged to sell

  1. Dealing with problems of offer and acceptance.

    However, the Courts have said that it must be made clear that the offer would be accepted even if the amended payment terms were refused, as established in this case, G Percy Trentham Ltd v Archital Luxfer Ltd (1993)

  2. Outline the basic rule of the law of contract regarding the effective revocation of ...

    On June 29 the plaintiff wrote back to the defendant "accepting" the offer of June 6. The plaintiff brought an action for specific performance. The defendant filed a general demurrer. It was held that there was no existence of a valid binding contract between the parties for the purchase of the property.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work