• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Entores ltd V. Miles Far East Corperation [1955] 2 QB 327(CA)

Extracts from this document...


Case note ENTORES LTD V. MILES FAR EAST CORPORATION [1955] 2 QB 327(CA) Parties to the Case Miles Far East Corporation are an American corporation with agents all over the world, including a Dutch Company in Amsterdam. (Appellants) Entores Ltd are a company registered and resident in England, with an office in London. (Respondents) Procedural History There was a breach of contract by the appellant. In the county court the respondents ordered to serve notice of the writ in an action for damages for breach of contract on the ground that the contract was made in England and therefore fell within the terms of R.S.C.,ord. 11,r 1 (e),(i). Miles Far East Corporation appealed to the Court of Appeal. It was an interlocutory appeal for the discharge of the order dated Dec. 17 1954 which gave liberty to the plaintiffs to serve the notice of a writ. chaMaterial Facts The English Company received a telex offer from the Dutch company. Telex, like a telephone is the form of the instantaneous communication. Each Company had a teleprinter machine in its office; and each has a teletex number like a telephone number. For the moment one party type out the message, the other party ought to be receiving it on to the paper. ...read more.


Wrench (1840) 3 Beav. 334.] or revoked, [Watson v. Davies, ante.] and knowledge of the revocation has been communicated to the offeree. [Henthorn v. Fraser [1892] 2 Ch. 27.] Where an offer is capable of being accepted by post, the time of acceptance is generally the time at which the acceptance is posted. [Adams v. Lindsell (1818) 1 B. & Ald. 681.] This is so even though the posted acceptance never arrives at its destination. [Household Fire and Carriage Insurance Co. v. Grant (1879) 4 Ex. D. 216.] This rule does not apply to the revocation of an offer, which must be actually communicated to the offeree. [Henthorn v. Fraser [1892] 2 Ch. 27.] Furthermore, the rule may be negatived by express words. So where an option was required to be exercised "by notice" it was held that a notice meant something which came to the attention of the person to whom it was addressed, so that the "posting rule" did not apply. [Holwell Securities v. Hughes [1974] 1 W.L.R. 155.] The "posting rule" does not apply to instantaneous communications between the parties, e.g. telex, [Entores v. Miles Far East Corporation [1955] 2 Q.B. 327.] or, presumably, facsimile transmission. ...read more.


They apply to contracts by post as well as instantaneous communications. Even thought, in the United States of America the instantaneous communication are treated as postal communications there is no difference between English and American Law: see American restatement S.64, in the case of the contract of the telephone, it has been held in America that the contract is made at the place where the acceptance is spoken, therefore dealing with such a contract the same principal as that applicable in the case of a letter to telegram. Lord Parker made a number of general comments in his judgment which could be seen as obiter dictum: 'The requirement as to actual notification of the acceptance is for the benefit of the offeror, he may waive it and agree to substitution for that requirement of some other conduct by the acceptor. He may do so expressly, as in the advertisement cases, by intimating that he is content with the performance of a condition. Again, he may do so impliedly by indicating a contemplated method of acceptance, for example, by postal telegram. In such a case he does not expressly dispense with actual notification, but he is held to have done so impliedly on grounds of expediency'. 1 1B &Ald.681 2)1 H.L.C 381 3 (1872)L.R.7Ch.587 4 (1871)L.R.6Exch.108 5 (1879)4Ex.D.216 6 (1892)2Ch.27,32; 8 T.L.B. 459 7 (1870)L.R. 6Exch. 7. 8 (1888)20 Q.B.D. 640 9 (1904)1Ch.305; 20T.L.R. 125 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Law of Contract section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Law of Contract essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    "The requirement of consideration is an unnecessary complication in the formation of contracts."

    4 star(s)

    In the past, when it had seemed inequitable for the courts to strictly demand consideration in some cases, the judges will go to much lengths to search and sometimes even create consideration, they exercise some degree of discreet and have not gone as far as to outrightly claim that even

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Contract Law - Offer And Acceptance

    3 star(s)

    terms, the original offer is terminated and counter-offer is made * In the counter-offer, the offeror becomes offeree and vice versa. Hyde v Wrench (1840) 6 June W offered to sell his estate to H for �1000; H offered �950 27 June W rejected H's offer, 29 June H offered �1000.

  1. Four ways in which a contract may be discharged.

    Under the contract the full price was payable before the date the procession became impossible. In fact the hirer had paid �100. The Fibrosa [1942] 2 All ER 122. An English company agreed to make machinery for a Polish company.

  2. I have been asked to advise a client on considering contracting with a building ...

    The promise should be supported by consideration and if it is not supported by consideration it is not binding. The case of Foakes V Beer 1884 is an example of waiver of existing rights; "The defendant had obtained a court judgement against the claimant for the sum of �2,091.

  1. Postal Acceptance Rule

    (Source: Kathryn O' Shea and Kylie Skeahan (1997) "Acceptance of offers by E-mail - How Far should the postal Acceptance Rule Extend? " QUT Law Journal, Vol 13, pp 247-262) The basic assumptions of postal acceptance rule is that * There will be substantial delay in delivery of the letter, depending on where the letter will be sent.

  2. Offer and Acceptance

    Sheena decides to purchase these shoes and goes to the cash desk. Tom, the cashier, informs her that they were actually � 35. Sheena believes that she should be allowed to buy the shoes at the labelled price. It is important to distinguish a true offer from what is known as an invitation to treat.

  1. Undue influence in the case of Barclays Bank v. O''Brian [1994] Lord Browne-Wilkinson was ...

    The basic rule is that performing an existing contractual obligation is insufficient consideration for a promise of more money (Stilk v. Myrick (1809)). As Ildar had a contract on 29 December with Camilla for the supply of plants it means that Camilla should have performed her contractual obligation.


    Bannerman v White (1861) 10 CBNS 844. A buyer negotiating for the sale of some hops asked if they had been treated with sulphur, saying that if they had he would not even bother asking the price. The seller stated that sulphur had not been used.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work