• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Establish whether or not there is a contract between Hettie and Barbara.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The first issue to consider in order to establish whether or not there is a contract between Hettie and Barbara is to define a contract. Also, it will be useful to explain the concept of offer and acceptance, which will lead to the conclusion of whether there is a contract between the two parties, Barbara and Hettie for the sale of the grand piano. The standard definition of contract by English lawyers is that a contract is an agreement which is legally enforceable or legally recognized as creating a duty. However, one widely used definition is that in the American Restatement of Contracts: A contract is a promise or a set of promises for the breach of which the law gives a remedy, or the performance of which the law in some way recognises as a duty.1 In other words, a contract is essentially a two-sided bargain which can only be concluded by the action of both parties. An offer is a clear and unambiguous statement of the terms upon which the offeror is willing to contract, should the person or persons to whom the offer is addressed decide to accept. An offer may be made expressly, but it may equally be implied from the offeror's language, or it may be inferred from his conduct. ...read more.

Middle

There is nothing specific by way of offer or rejection, but amere inquiry, which should have been answered and not treated as a rejection of the offer.' Barbara's letter on Tuesday also included a counter-offer, which 'kills off' the original offer due to the introduction of new terms, in this case, her 'assuming' that the adjustable stool and piano music will be included. This counter-offer killed off Hettie's original offer and makes it incapable of subsequent acceptance by Barbara. The rule of counter offer can be seen in operation in the case of Hyde v Wrench3 where an offer to sell an estate for �1,000 was met by a counter-offer to buy for �950. The counter-offer was rejected, and the buyer then wrote to say that he was prepared to pay �1,000 after all. But the seller now refused to sell to the offeree, even at this price, and the offeree sued. Although the offer to sell had not been withdrawn, it was held that there was no contract, as the counter-offer had amounted to a rejection of the original offer. So based on the classic illustration of the rule of counter-offer above, Barbara's letter cannot be deemed as an acceptance of Hettie's offer due to the counter-proposal introduced. ...read more.

Conclusion

On the other hand, if Hettie's revocation is based on Barbara's assumption that the music stool and piano music will be included, then her revocation is valid, as stated earlier in the case of Hyde v Wrench that the introduction of a counter-offer amounts to a rejection of the original offer. In effect, the revocation by Hettie makes it incapable for a binding contract to exist between herself and Barbara. James LJ: '...It is to my mind quite clear that before there was any attempt at acceptance by the plaintiff, he was perfectly well aware that Dodds had changed his mind and that he had, in fact, agredd to sell the property to Allan. It is impossible therefore, to say there was ever that existence of the same mind between the two parties which is essential in point of law to the making of an agreement.'7 So Barbara's quick acceptance of Hettie's original offer (in the stipulated mode of acceptance instructed by Hettie) does not bring about a binding contract between the two parties, as Barbara is perfectly well aware that Hettie is planning to sell her piano to Philip, and cannot as a point of law endeavour to bind Hettie in a contract, as there has to be an existence of the same mind between them to make it legally binding agreement. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Law of Contract section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Law of Contract essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    "The requirement of consideration is an unnecessary complication in the formation of contracts."

    4 star(s)

    is quite famous as this is the case where Lord Denning's obiter dictum extended the traditional estoppels to that of promissory or quasi estoppels. It established the principle that in certain circumstances, a promise conferred to another party can be binding regardless of the absence of consideration.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Contract Law - Offer And Acceptance

    3 star(s)

    However, the tender was recorded as having been received late and was not considered. The club sued for breach of an alleged warranty that a tender received by the deadline would be considered. The judge awarded damages for breach of contract and negligence.

  1. Four ways in which a contract may be discharged.

    Later the same day he cancelled the agreement. White & Carter refused to accept the cancellation. They prepared the advertising plates and displayed them for three years. They then sued for the contract price. 5. REMEDIES FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT.

  2. Invitation To Treat

    In this question, it establishes relationship between the two parties, Peter and Mary. It is a promise or a set of promises. It is defined as "every promise or set of promises forming consideration for each other". In this case, it is a social agreement.

  1. Contract law - Advise Sarah - The first thing to ascertain is whether the ...

    Dickinson via a reliable third party, the agent, prior to Mr. Dickinson's acceptance of the offer. As Mick had identified himself as Rick's brother, it would be safe to assume that he is a reliable third party, and if Sarah had not commenced her swim prior to Rick informing her

  2. I have been asked to advise a client on considering contracting with a building ...

    The outcome of the case was that the defendant's order was really a counter-offer. The claimant had accepted this by returning the tear-off slip. Acceptance must be communicated to the offeror and is not effective until this has been done.

  1. Offer and Acceptance

    It is then up to the farmer to make a new offer. Sheena may decline the counter offer of � 35, but unless she decides to make a new offer, the offer at the moment would be � 35. It must be made clear whether it is a counter offer

  2. Assess the problems that arise through terminating and offer

    This case shows that if the acceptance method of an offer has already started then it cannot be revoked as long as the party stays on top of the action required. This causes problems because how can you say that an offer is still there is the person has died,

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work