• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Establish whether or not there is a contract between Hettie and Barbara.

Extracts from this document...


The first issue to consider in order to establish whether or not there is a contract between Hettie and Barbara is to define a contract. Also, it will be useful to explain the concept of offer and acceptance, which will lead to the conclusion of whether there is a contract between the two parties, Barbara and Hettie for the sale of the grand piano. The standard definition of contract by English lawyers is that a contract is an agreement which is legally enforceable or legally recognized as creating a duty. However, one widely used definition is that in the American Restatement of Contracts: A contract is a promise or a set of promises for the breach of which the law gives a remedy, or the performance of which the law in some way recognises as a duty.1 In other words, a contract is essentially a two-sided bargain which can only be concluded by the action of both parties. An offer is a clear and unambiguous statement of the terms upon which the offeror is willing to contract, should the person or persons to whom the offer is addressed decide to accept. An offer may be made expressly, but it may equally be implied from the offeror's language, or it may be inferred from his conduct. ...read more.


There is nothing specific by way of offer or rejection, but amere inquiry, which should have been answered and not treated as a rejection of the offer.' Barbara's letter on Tuesday also included a counter-offer, which 'kills off' the original offer due to the introduction of new terms, in this case, her 'assuming' that the adjustable stool and piano music will be included. This counter-offer killed off Hettie's original offer and makes it incapable of subsequent acceptance by Barbara. The rule of counter offer can be seen in operation in the case of Hyde v Wrench3 where an offer to sell an estate for �1,000 was met by a counter-offer to buy for �950. The counter-offer was rejected, and the buyer then wrote to say that he was prepared to pay �1,000 after all. But the seller now refused to sell to the offeree, even at this price, and the offeree sued. Although the offer to sell had not been withdrawn, it was held that there was no contract, as the counter-offer had amounted to a rejection of the original offer. So based on the classic illustration of the rule of counter-offer above, Barbara's letter cannot be deemed as an acceptance of Hettie's offer due to the counter-proposal introduced. ...read more.


On the other hand, if Hettie's revocation is based on Barbara's assumption that the music stool and piano music will be included, then her revocation is valid, as stated earlier in the case of Hyde v Wrench that the introduction of a counter-offer amounts to a rejection of the original offer. In effect, the revocation by Hettie makes it incapable for a binding contract to exist between herself and Barbara. James LJ: '...It is to my mind quite clear that before there was any attempt at acceptance by the plaintiff, he was perfectly well aware that Dodds had changed his mind and that he had, in fact, agredd to sell the property to Allan. It is impossible therefore, to say there was ever that existence of the same mind between the two parties which is essential in point of law to the making of an agreement.'7 So Barbara's quick acceptance of Hettie's original offer (in the stipulated mode of acceptance instructed by Hettie) does not bring about a binding contract between the two parties, as Barbara is perfectly well aware that Hettie is planning to sell her piano to Philip, and cannot as a point of law endeavour to bind Hettie in a contract, as there has to be an existence of the same mind between them to make it legally binding agreement. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Law of Contract section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Law of Contract essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    "The requirement of consideration is an unnecessary complication in the formation of contracts."

    4 star(s)

    The doctrine of promissory estoppels was the basis of argument in this case and yet the judges have chosen to depart from most of the principle limitations of the doctrine. It was a controversial case in the sense that the doctrine was used as a cause of action where there

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Contract Law - Offer And Acceptance

    3 star(s)

    right to decide how many to allot to each applicant * Issuing later to existing shareholder informing rights of them is not an offer, it just a mere information of their rights14 Termination Of Offers * Termination of offer can be done before the offer is accepted * The termination

  1. Marked by a teacher

    A contract by definition is an agreement between two parties by which both parties ...

    3 star(s)

    a particular price the offer can then be accepted by the seller in some actions for example by entering the price in a cash register. Only after this is the offer a binding contract. When Viv put the advert in the local newspaper and attaching a price, she was inviting

  2. Offer and Acceptance

    This is shown in the case Bloom v American Swiss Watch Co. (1915) where information was given which led to the arrest of thieves who had broken into a man's premises. The person whom gave the information was without knowledge of the � 500 reward being offered by the man.


    .....The question is whether a breach of clause 7 is capable of being remedied. Failure to make one particular visit might have irremediable consequences e.g. a valuable order might have been lost when making that visit would have obtained it.


    As for piers the courts may see the EU as too far geographically and a period of 18 months maybe too long, it also depends on Piers skills and information he could use. Relevant case Faccenda Chicken ltd v Fowler (1986)

  1. "There are occasions where terms are implied into contracts which have never been discussed ...

    Once it has been decided that a particular term should be incorporated, that case will then stand as precedent for future cases involving the same kind of agreement. The case of Liverpool City Council v Irwin can be used to demonstrate this.

  2. Invitation To Treat

    The Black & White Company is required to return the payment back to Richard together with the amount that he has make the doctor consultation. Answer to Question 2 A will is a legal document through which a person bequeaths his absolute properties, both immovable and movable to others.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work